Back to simple simon tv . If only that guy wasnt around things would be completely different is the comedy sketch that never dies
You like behaving like a jerk donât you. Oh silly me, forgot, a bot . . .
Good night.
By all means go cryâŚ
On FB : Is this possible?
Rubia Garcia II
odepsSronthc3au5im9a431ci02g93i18t3312hag6gl18 ua3a569f19lft ¡
In short, the REAL reason DJT is suddenly sending troops into Portland, Oregon â in case it felt random. Literally â follow the money. Let me explainâŚ
Yesterday, (Sept. 27th), I shared DJTâs post on Truth Social:
âAt the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect war-ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists. I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary.â
Out of nowhere, he declared Portland âwar ravagedâ and ordered in troops.
Oregon officials â Gov. Tina Kotek, Mayor Keith Wilson â immediately said it was nonsense.
Portland was calm.
No one had asked for help.
Local leaders flatly told DJT the number of troops needed was 0.
So why Oregon? Why now?
Letâs follow the money, beloved.
No. Literally.
Bc hereâs the part that got buried in the noise these last few weeks.
How about Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon has been investigating Jeffrey Epsteinâs financial network for over 3 years now.
On Sept. 9th, he introduced the âProduce Epstein Treasury Records Actâ, a bill designed to compel Treas. Sec. Scott Bessent to release ALL of Epsteinâs suspicious financial activity reports to the Senate.
This legislation is part of Wydenâs ongoing effort to trace the BILLIONS of dollars flowing through Epsteinâs accounts and uncover the financial enablers of his crimes.
Wydenâs team has already seen glimpses â more than $1.5 BILLION in suspicious transactions, including:
â Over 4,7k wire transfers totaling approximately $1.1B processed through Epsteinâs JPMorgan Chase account.
â Payments to women from Eastern European countries, the regions where many of Epsteinâs alleged victims originated.
â Transfers through sanctioned Russian banks, used to process payments tied to sex trafficking.
â Involvement of other major financial institutions, including Deutsche Bank, Bank of New York Mellon, and Bank of America, which facilitated roughly $1.9B in Epstein-linked transactions.
â Investments tied to billionaire Peter Thiel, including $40M in Valar Ventures that has grown to roughly $170M â the largest asset of Epsteinâs estate.
- And heâs also pressing JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon to explain WHY THE HELL the bank continued to do business with Epstein long AFTER his 2008 conviction.
Now⌠if yâall remember, just a few days after Wydenâs bill (and 2 days before DJT made the post about sending troops to Portland (Sept. 25th)), I was sharing how the House Oversight Committee received a 3rd batch of documents from Epsteinâs estate, including calendars, call logs, and cash ledgers.
These are NOT Treasury financial reports - BUT, they complement Wydenâs investigation by showing operational patterns, interactions, and the broader context of Epsteinâs network, just in general.
In shorter words, and to make it plain: the timing of DJTâs troop deployment comes just DAYS after Wyden escalated the Treasury financial investigation, and just 2 days AFTER the new Epstein documents were released to Congress.
Coincidence? I sure tf donât think so.
And thatâs not just Oregon news.
Thatâs the kind of story that could expose powerful men, global banks, and YEARS of cover-ups.
Not that I need to say this⌠but I think by now we all know this is NOT about âlaw and orderâ in Portland. smh.
So, in these kinds of instances, itâs best to look for what they donât want you to see.
It is, once again IMHO, a headline-grabbing distraction.
By sending troops, DJT shifts attention away --AGAIN-- from the financial and operational investigations that could expose powerful people and institutions connected to Epstein.
And thereâs one more layer we canât ignore.
Sending troops into Portland isnât just a distraction â itâs a message.
Itâs DJT showing Oregon (and every other state that dares to dig too deep) that the federal government can come for you if you step out of line.
Itâs about intimidating the home base of the senator whoâs pulling on the financial threads of the Epstein network.
Itâs about making the âWyden-Epstein storyâ look like a local political scuffle instead of a global financial scandal.
Itâs about rebranding a city known for protests and investigative journalism as âwar-ravagedâ â so anything coming out of it can be dismissed as chaos.
THIS is how you bury a money trail:
By flooding the news cycle with âtroopsâ and âriotsâ and âlaw and order,â you turn the place where the investigation originates into a circus â and hope the public looks away from the billion-dollar question.
So no, DJT suddenly sending troops into Portland wasnât random IMHO.
And the scope of the story is no longer just about Epstein, banks, or Congress:
â Itâs about how power and media attention can be manipulated to bury inconvenient truths;
â Itâs about drowning out the story that actually matters â the money trail;
â And itâs about sending a warning shot at the people and places digging for those answers.
As always, sources in comments.
Hope this helped.
~Ms. G, J.D.
You.
You of all people questioning across the Atlantic as the continent you live in slips ever more into totalitarianism and war to drown out the calls to change EU politics. Case in point - the sudden push for national digital ID cards in the UK and other countries. Or the new Chat Control mass surveillance proposed by the EU to acquire the ability to scan all private correspondence for âproblematicâ material, Germany you have AfD candidates banned from running or DEAD, Romania bans a political opponent who was leading in the election polls because of anti NATO policies, while moldova adopts 'european values " by banning two opposition parties deemed âpro-Kremlinâ just hours before the election is set to kick off. And thats not to mention to undemocratic france
This is the worst logical fallacy post Iâve ever seen. Not even worth naming them.
Another post that turns into a complete faceplant
My question was about Trump policies in Portland and his motives.
The post I copied says that this is because he wants to punish Oregon because Oregon senator for pushing the inquiry about the Epstein files.
To attack Europe is a diversionary tactics.
As this topic is about Trump i will not answer here !!! If you want to debate Europe slide in totalitarianism, open another topic.
I am sorry Lausten fell in your trap.
I ask the question again :
Is it true that Trump deploys the national guard in Portland to punish Oregon because Oregon senator for pushing the inquiry about the Epstein files ?
You.
Big on trump talk. Same talk not for whats happening at home.
Once more, a diversionary tactic.
you may open a new topic or better use others existing. There is one about France.
I ask the question again :
Is it true that Trump deploys the national guard in Portland to punish Oregon because Oregon senator for pushing the inquiry about the Epstein files ?
You know what , Democrats and corporate media are covering for trump on this. All the American bourgeois organs of power, including the media outlets linked to them, are showing clear signs of complicity and impotence in the growing threat of a fascist dictatorship.
They all fear that Trumpâs deeply authoritarian moves against the people in major cities would create another revolutionary situation, which they believe would undermine their class interests as well. For this reason, senior Democratic party officials are saying, We would solve it through the Supreme Court, meaning nothing will happen since it is packed with reactionaries appointed by Trump himself.
Dems are going to sue the SC ?? Essentially - its all on the courts headed by a SC with a 6-3 ultra-right majorityâand Republican defectors in Congress to decide whether the American people will live under a presidential military dictatorship.
I donât believe that you donât understand how suing works. No one is suing any court.
1 Like
Many donts.
Dems good for ensuring nothing will happen
I linked Court cases that they won. You have a weird definition of ânothingâ
[quote="lausten, post:56, topic:524sio
linked Court cases that they won. You have a weird dof ânothingâ
[/quote]
What has that got to do with SC decision on the national guard deployment? Explain
Thatâs your speculation. Itâs hasnât happened yet. You are making claims that arenât backed up by facts or events
Listen up big dummy . In response to a question on what he will do, the highest ranking democrat Schumer said, âWe will fight it in the courts " Thats a dead end with the SC court stacked 6 to 3 not in democrats favour.
Not everything goes to the SC. Itâs that simple.