… it can only happen in a place like Seattle. Or maybe Portland. The city is so White and so liberal that this is practically inevitable.
A history lesson:
On Oregon. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/oregons-founders-sought-a-white-utopia-a-stain-of-racism-that-lives-on-even-as-state-celebrates-its-progressivism/ar-BB15sXQ1?ocid=spartanntp
Oregon became a state in 1859 as the United States was hurtling toward civil war. Slavery, the issue that was tearing the young nation apart, was banned in the new state. Many of Oregon’s leaders believed they had a better model.
They wouldn’t allow black people at all.
You would have fit right in, in Oregon in those days, Oneguy.
… Oregon is also one of the whitest states in the country -- originally by design. The effects of that history of racism are still felt today.
The authors of Oregon’s constitution declared that no “free negro or mulatto … shall come, reside or be within this State, or hold any real estate.”
The state’s founders sought to create nothing short of “a white utopia,” says Oregon author and scholar Walidah Imarisha. “An idealized racist white society.”
It wasn’t just blacks they sought to keep out, but pretty much all who were not white. So that sort of thing continued on from 1859 to the early 1920’s when the KKK was rampant in Oregon.
After WWII, the white supremacist view declined in Oregon. However,
… Progressive white Americans might reject racism and insist there’s no place for it in today’s society, but that doesn’t mean they want to give up the advantages it’s provided them. Institutionalized racism created intergenerational wealth for some and not others; it shaped the geography of the cities and towns we traverse every day.
… recent events – such as Jeremy Christian’s 2017 racism-sparked murder of two men on a MAX train in Portland – show that the echoes from the past can still pack a very real wallop.
Imarisha says we’re all taught that society heads in only one direction – forward, embracing progress – but that “it’s important to show the cyclical nature of history. At best history is a spiral.”
When we look around and find ourselves thinking, “We’ve been here before,” she says, it’s “because we have.”
That’s why, she insists, reforming the system – governmental, corporate, cultural – isn’t enough.
“We’ve been offered ‘kinder, gentler’ reform [in the past] and it’s landed us in the same place,” Imarisha says. “We need deep, institutional, transformational change.”