She wasnât ever president so she canât go down in history as that. I havenât had time to look up âoperation cycloneâ, but somehow I have doubts about djtexasâ statements.
She wasnât ever president so she canât go down in history as that. I havenât had time to look up âoperation cycloneâ, but somehow I have doubts about djtexasâ statements.
That was a touch of sarcasm about sweeping and completely overblown statement about âdictatorâ.
Where do these people get this nonsense from? Hillary Clinton was a model of humanitarianism. She would have made a wonderful president.
I agree, but she didnât win and IMHO, itâs because the dotard cheated and the Repugs want to keep women (a minority, due to lack of power) down. They donât like it that Kamala succeeded in become VP on two counts- sheâs a woman and sheâs a woman of colour. So, they make up stupid crap about her, just as they do about Hillary. Hillary had one strike against her- sheâs a woman, but in the Repugsâ minds, it doesnât matter if a woman has one strike or two, they will still drag her through the mud, even if a male Repug did what they accuse her of doing. The only reason the Repugs wanted that woman on the Supreme court, after RBG died, is because they knew, without a doubt, she would submit to their will, just as Jesus tells women to do. She must obey her husband/father and in their view, any other man who tells her what to do. They knew sheâd kiss their butt, because God said to.
And Bush, the Shrub, and other Repugs are not warmongers? Keep in mind, we went to war with the Middle East when the Shrub was in power, not when Hillary served under President Obama. Hillary didnât even beat the dotard in which to Leader and Chief. So⌠See my last post- if a woman does what a man does, Repugs drag her through the mud, UNLESS sheâs kissing their butt and doing their bidding. If that woman the Repugs put on the Supreme Court didnât vote as they demanded on Texasâ denial of womenâs Constitutional rights, they would have berated her, demeaned her, and more.
If Iran attacks Israel⌠if Iran attacks Israel,âŚif Iran attacks Israel
If Iran attacks Israel⌠if Iran attacks Israel,âŚif Iran attacks Israel
If Iran attacks Israel⌠if Iran attacks Israel,âŚif Iran attacks Israel
If Iran attacks Israel⌠if Iran attacks Israel,âŚif Iran attacks Israel
Letâs even the rumor scale a little shall we?
Hillary Clinton did not threaten Iran with war, she warned Iran against threatening Israel with war.
You do know that what you are engaging here is sedition ?
As president, I will take whatever actions are necessary to protect the United States and our allies. I will not hesitate to take military action if Iran attempts to obtain a nuclear weapon.
You are one of the least intelligent members here â and that is saying a lot, but this this laughably stupid, even for you. I would normally suggest checking out the links I posted above to get familiar with recent history, but it doesnât matter. Youâre just not smart enough.
The video is not some âmoment of clarityâ like TYT tells you to think it is. Iâve said those things. Itâs the theme of the book âCharlie Wilsonâs warâ, itâs well known to anyone who has spent more than a couple hours studying the history. She uses the word âweâ, referring to our government. For much of the time period she is discussing, she was first lady.
It is relevant in that the Shrub started it all and no, I donât have an unrealistic view of her at all. It seems to me, unless you want to discuss the presidents who were also at war with the Middle East, which includes Bush and Shrub, then you are the one with the unrealistic view.