Will the "Emoluments Clause" ever catch up to Mr. trump?

Mr. trump thinks the Emoluments Clause is phony (well at least it doesn’t apply to him, he’s so very speecial.)

= = = = = = =

Also see Brennan Center article

Opinion by KARL RACINE, BRIAN FROSH and NORMAN EISEN

02/08/2021

Karl Racine is the attorney general for the District of Columbia.

Brian Frosh is the attorney general for Maryland.

Mr. Eisen is their former co-counsel in the emoluments litigation and served as President Obama’s ethics czar. He now serves as outside counsel for the nonpartisan Voter Protection Program.

Three and a half years ago, we took President Donald Trump to court over unconstitutional payments he received from foreign and domestic governments through his hotel in downtown D.C. while serving as president.

Recently, the Supreme Court declared that our lawsuit and Trump’s appeal of it were moot given that President Joe Biden had taken office. Trump’s departure from the White House may have effectively terminated the case against him,

but we still secured a significant victory: Judge Peter J. Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled in 2018, the year after we filed suit, that the Constitution forbids the president from receiving anything of value from a foreign or domestic government.

His decision was the first time a court ruled that the Constitution broadly prohibits such transactions, rejecting Trump’s much narrower interpretation that the clause prohibited only transactions involving personal services.

Under this interpretation, Trump would not be able to accept payment if he served as a personal driver to Saudi Arabia’s King Mohammed Bin Salman while in office, but the president’s hotels and businesses would be able to accept millions of dollars in cash from the Saudi leader.)

As a result of Judge Messitte’s decision, the law we made along the way—still in force—set a standard by which all future presidents will be judged. Now Congress must build upon that to broadly preclude future presidential conflicts and self-dealing. …

Seems like old history doesn’t it?

Thing is there’s a rumor going around that Mr.trump’s presidential profiteering will be coming front and center and into the spotlight, in the near future.

Text P. The Parchment Signed by the Delegates to the Philadelphia Convention – Variorum Constitution

“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

Emolument: emolument
: the returns arising from office or employment usually in the form of compensation or perquisites, (or bribes, for that matter)

So I figured a little background wouldn’t hurt for future reference.
We shall see.

Here’s an interesting look at the “Pro” American MAGA trumpster family in action, and what they really think about “pro-American” - update April 2024

Apr 17, 2024

Trump and his foreign policy IS UP FOR SALE through his son in law Jared Kushner. In one of the biggest fraud schemes we have scene, kushner has made $40 million a year from Gulf Arab States and their billions of investments in him, while 0 of those dollars are going into American businesses or to help everyday Americans. Americans United will keep fighting for freedom without favor - equality without exception. Keep up with this issue at Https://au.org/legalaf

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/jared-kushner-family-trump-holocaust-225210

Well that didn’t last long (Assange)

also

Well I’m not an Assange’s fan, he caught the tiger’s tail, he knew what he was doing.
What is it they say, do the crime, pay the crime.

There are many, many worse injustices out there.

And I’m impotent to do anything about any of them,
Dadada, so what do you want me to do about it?

What american crime do you say this Australian has committed??

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/16/politics/ecuador-response-assange-wikileaks/index.html
Atlanta CNN — July 16, 2019
Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa said Tuesday his country was aware that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was interfering in the 2016 US presidential election from the safety of Ecuador’s embassy in London, where he lived under political asylum until this year.

“We did notice that he was interfering in the elections and we do not allow that because we have principles, very clear values, as we would not like anyone to interfere in our elections,” he said. “We are not going to allow that to happen with a foreign country and friend like the US.”

Correa granted asylum in 2012 to Assange, …

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/15/politics/assange-embassy-exclusive-documents/index.html

Exclusive: Security reports reveal how Assange turned an embassy into a command post for election meddling

By Marshall Cohen, Kay Guerrero and Arturo Torres, CNN - July 15, 2019

Is being Australian supposed to offer some immunity?
.
.
,

1 Like

It was an incredibly simple question that has yet to be answered. What is the American crime that you say this Australian has committed. Your own words

Why would you make this demand? What are you trying to accomplish?

Hacking !!!

[Julian Assange - Wikipedia]

3 Likes

Some people read books and UN reports while others read Wikipedia

Just look at all those references Wikipedia gives you. You could check so many facts

How glib. Whats the charge?

Answered twice in this thread

Quite the opposite. Channelling truth central on these pages.

I read this as what is the actual crime that you folks agree he has committed. Clue = it aint hacking

We don’t meet secretly and agree. How do you know what we think?

You have an interest in this. Its above you to spell out the alleged crime?

It’s beneath me to attempt to satisfy your arbitrary standards

Its beyond you to tell us what you think . Youre just here to snarl

I did tell you. No idea what you want

You talked about wikipedia . Glip,

You have no idea what this about