This is just one of quite a series. You all seem to have amnesia; as if these threads don’t have a history.
Playing stupid on what I mean by the West is; I could use NATO, or just the U$, as you suggest, but I’m sure that this attack is merely a minor tantram to cover your losses.
As you harken to some ‘millenia old ethnic conflict’ would you care now to support your side? I’ve already contradicted this; you seem to think that spouting these words is some sort of support. The link I gave is CIA intelligence, and it exactly falsifies your statement.
You inhabit a land of the lost. By buying into a fraud mainstream narrative you have floated off into a space that is extemely vulnerable. For instance: the recent liberal moves to expend so much energy on the LGBTQ narrative: this is merely a buildup to get cut down. As to who wins such a fight, and as to where deep state loyalties actually lay: I can assure you that they are not with the Democratic Party. They are merely a tool. Every opportunity and every tool are getting ready now for a transition. I am scared. Many are. Your sense of security with deep state backing and within a deep state narrative is predictably a loser. Christians In Action is only partially a joke.
I predict that we are on the edge of a religious revival. This will be their next gambit. Politics is so destroyed that there is nothing else for people to turn to… other than philosophy, that is, and Eastern religions as well as Western. Normalizing Nazis in Ukraine; while the public reels in disgust with the LGBTQ thing; the invalid assumption though is that the thing is bifurcated. That people will accept a division into two sides. They’ve worked this game for centuries. The cold war is as much a matter of harnessing the public. This need to have an enemy develops exclusive nationalism. It is reignited now. It is provably a fraud. Russiagate is exposed. Why would the left would play into such a narrative? The elevation of Trump to such a serpentine level as a challenger to Godzilla himself was their doing. We are about to witness another remarkable election cycle. Trump wants to demolish the deep state. It’s part of his stump speech. As Kennedyesque as this is, on the other side an actual Kennedy is running to do what? To demolish the deep state. How did that release of the documents on the Kennedy assassinations go? Who? Trump? It’s a known fact now that the CIA killed both Kennedys. Oliver Stone secured it, I guess.
The local lies here do still support my theory that I am actually posting to an infiltrated site. This is not surprising. That I have not been denied yet is interesting. It is as if an edict has come from the top that ensures my first amendment rights here. Still, it feels dubious posting here. Still, again, to expose such pedantic minds is a pleasure. Of course my hope is that in turning a few over I will have done my part.
No you haven’t done anything but complain. Not a single positive suggestion or observation. You’re a do-nothing whiner.
So far all you have done is pollute this forum with political speech instead of doing something positive. Go plant a tree, then you’ll have my respect.
Western and, in particular, American secret services are warning the Russians of a high risk of terrorist attacks.
Russians publicly denounce attempted Western destabilization
Attack in Moscow, claimed by Daesh which proves to be the author.
Putin insinuates that the Ukrainians had something to do with it, stating that the perpetrators of the attack were arrested near the Ukrainian border while they were arrested closer to the Belarusian border and that the Ukrainian border is an ultra secure military zone, Russian side.
Finally, Russian information services show footage of severe torture of those arrested.
And Putin still has people who believe in him in the West?
Really having trouble following your questions @daniel4spain Could you speak from your experience? Add input, not just responses.
From the FAQ
Inquiry does not flourish in an atmosphere of heated rhetoric, mutual vilification or recrimination. Disagreements should be kept, as much as possible, to the issues at hand and not become overly personalized.
It simply is not true that neither side can win. The Russians will and the Russians are. They’re currently going through the processes of systematically turning off the electricity across the country, having taken a year or so with a ‘reconnaissance in force’ of targeting the transmission system (which can only be replaced by 330V systems that only the Russians produce). The RF have figured out defences for every one of the NATO systems sent from the javelins to HIMARS to Storm Shadows and, crucially, they’ve the national resolve to see this through (which comes in part from actually paying attention to the carnage the Ukrainians were inflicting on the civilians of the Donbas for the last decade).
They prepared for this by not entrusting their military industrial systems to the private sector and the whims of the financialised, rent-extracting, corporate captured system that passes for a ‘market’ in the West.
NATO may get involved, and wil cause great loss to the Russians if they do, but the RF will still prevail. They have the means and the will to do so.
How did they lose in Afghanistan? There is a great scene in the movie version of Charlie Wilson’s War, where the Russians in their helicopters are blasting a small town and talking about their girlfriends and what they’ll do that weekend, and one guy with a shoulder-fired rocket takes down a couple of them.
I read the book first. It’s the true story of how Afghanistan won the war against Russia, resulting in the breakup of the USSR. Do you know that history? You talk like you know so much, I didn’t think I needed to explain that.
Is it that implausible that a Russian troll is here? Or that someone listens to propaganda and believes it? Or that someone believes that peace is obtained by giving in to power? These are all common.
