Trump our Russian Obligate President, Commander in Chief, or Supreme Traitor

You are missing a key ingredient to your recipe. Russia sending and establishing heavy weaponry to Mexico. Shake, stir and pour into a long tall glass. How does that taste? Bitter?

Yes good comparison Morgan. The US thought this was unacceptable and like some people here refuse to acknowledge that what they are doing in Ukraine is unacceptable to Russia

Yes, and what does Russia is barely acceptable either … It is a game of power and prestige between superpowers.

At least the players are rational, as the German leaders were not before WWII.

We can only hope that Putin and Chinese leaders will not make same mistake as the one made by German and Japanese, believing that because they were reluctant to make wars, democracies were weak in will and power, and unable to answer.

One must stay in real politics, even if i don’t like it. Let('s say it is the least worst alternative.

And i prefer to live in a democratic country than in a dictatorship like Russia or a totalitarian state as China.

No, the taste is bitter for the Ukrainians. Russia is the provocateur here.
Nobody is threatening to invade Russia. You can try and twist this any way you can, but the fact remains that Russia is amassing mobile troops threatening invasion.
You cannot occupy a nation without troops.

Stationary heavy weaponry is primarily defensive in purpose. Just stop with your false justification. You know Russia has nothing to fear from the US or Ukraine. Ukraine does have reason to fear Russia, that is why they are seeking the protection of NATO, not just the US.

[quote=“triplex69, post:167, topic:7937”]
Anyway all the huff and puff of an invasion predicted by western media shown up to be more fake news again. Let’s hope that NATO aka USA doesn’t make the same mistake as Germany and Japan made but rather reciprocates with pulling her 10,000 troops out

https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/more-than-10000-russian-troops-returning-bases-after-drills-near-ukraine-2021-12-25/
[/quote]

Leaving only 165,000 troops, hardly worth worrying about?
You cannot be serious and that makes you duplicitous and dangerous.

It’s Not 165 ,000 ……

Anarchists say that the difference between dictatorship and democracy is that in dictatorships the power says to the people " Shut up " and in democracy they say : " Carry on, I don’t give a dam !"

Nevertheless, i prefer to live in democracy, even a formal one.

And whatever their defaults, about which i am very conscious, democracies are formally and politically democratic.

1 Like

I see, basic arithmetic doesn’t exist in Russia. 175,000 - 10,000 = 17.5 troops left !!!

It’s hard to tell if triplex69 is a consumer of disinformation or a progenitor of it. Either way, he’s a disseminator (I’m assuming the male pronoun at this point, based on personality). It’s the simplest form of bad diplomacy (intentional or not), pick the facts you like, make your case. It can be heard at any municipal bar in any small town in America on any given night. You can explain the timeline, the cause and effect, the past behaviors, the obvious motivations, however you want, it won’t matter to him.

Morgan - Pretending to live freely when you are not is the great western democracy trick!!

I make no claims of “better than you”. You are making claims I am “less than you”.

When are you going to talk about some things we have in common, instead of what sets us apart? Always an adversary posture is not conducive to peaceful commerce.

Dictatorships always need and “enemy” (real or imagined). Read George Orwell’s 1984.

I don’t think anyone in any country lives freely, at least not completely freely.

One can only be free within reasonable boundaries. There is no such thing as complete freedom.

I am not fully free, it is not possible. It is impossible to be totally free as in any society, so democratic it is, individual freedom stops as one must respect any other member rights and freedoms.

Now, it is true that in a capitalistic system, capitalists are more free than the other ones.

but, in a western democracy any one is more free than in a dictatorship or in a totalitarian state, leaders excepted.

In a democracy, one may travel freely, for instance, express his opinions, even if he criticizes the leaders and so …

1 Like

Chinese can travel freely . And if you challenge power you will be crushed no matter if it’s China USA UK or Australia. Your voice certainly won’t be heard on the airwaves just like in absolute totalitarian states. Remember what Obama did to Occupy Wall St?

Again playing with words, as if “free” is easily defined and he knows what it means, but we are just deluded. He keeps getting responses, but once we cover this diversion, he’ll throw out another.

That’s what I’m referring to.

Maybe you should watch more Free Speech TV and less Right Wing media.

[How China's Approved Destination Status Policy Spurs and Hinders Chinese Travel Abroad - Association for Asian Studies]

nato preparing for war . Watch out for the false flag as an excuse for hostilities