Oh lordie, you guys look up to Bill Clinton as a male sexual role model??? That’s funny!Who said anything about that? The point is Clinton was acting normally for a man in his position.
Quite right. There is a chemistry between powerful men and women. However, the attraction is not there if the females are feminists. In which case, there is a repulsion; as in, light poles repel. Do you think the reason is because feminists are actually males in female form?"Males in female form" -- like transsexuals? Nah, but I guess a lot feminists do tend to look manly -- and that has an effect on their unpleasantness because life is harsh for an unattractive woman. It's no surprise that feminists tend to be unattractive in general.
That is if you discount a woman’s take on sex. On what authority do you speak on behalf of women? Ask a woman in the West and ask what sex means to her. Have you ever tried to?Women outside the West don't attach sentimentality to sex either. That attitude is unique to Western societies.
“Males in female form” — like transsexuals? Nah, but I guess a lot feminists do tend to look manly — and that has an effect on their unpleasantness because life is harsh for an unattractive woman. It’s no surprise that feminists tend to be unattractive in general.No, I don't mean transsexuals; I meant feminists, humans in female form but scary to real men. And they don't necessarily look manly. Some deliberately turn on their sexuality to wield their power on men and then spit on their susceptibility to their wiles. Here, this is what I mean:
Women outside the West don’t attach sentimentality to sex either. That attitude is unique to Western societies.You speak with authority. You think women in the west are full of themselves? They feel that they are more than mere service animals (i.e. sex objects) and want to be consecrated as fountains of love?
That is what’s known as a femme fatale, not a feminist.
TimB: Oh lordie, you guys look up to Bill Clinton as a male sexual role model??? That’s funny!Oneguy: Who said anything about that? The point is Clinton was acting normally for a man in his position.
Ok, you are saying that Clinton is a “normal man”, sexually speaking. I can buy that, in terms of that may be how most men are. So then, is a sexually “normal man” who is famous, not a role model for young males?
You suggest that it is normal for a man to use his position of power over others, to enlist and entice a young women in his employ to give him blow jobs, while his unsuspecting wife is in another part of their big house, and then when discovered to lie about it, until his lies no longer work.
That may be a “sexually normal man”. But he is not a decent role model for getting your rocks off. And maybe that “normal” needs to change.
That may be a “sexually normal man”.Only dogs are sexually normal. When it comes to men, all bets are off.
Dogs can lick their own dicks and a-holes. Men would do that too, if they could. Dogs just do it for cleanliness. Men would do it for sexual stimulation.