You just switched the subject. Does it matter to you that Le Pen broke the law?
Lavrentiy Beria to Stalin - show me the man and i will find you the crime
M L-P has been condemned by an independent tribunal, according due process of law.
The tribunal has applied a law ML-P voted, even claiming it was to lenient. Macron has nothing to do with the sentence and, any way, he cannot be candidate another time.
The RN, the party of M L-P has another candidate.
And, last and mainly, M L-P committed the crimes she has been condemned for, as Trump has committed his ones.
Macron did not do anything !!!
M L-P has committed a misdemeanor and has been condemned. the only person she can complain to is herself !!!
Contrary to Trump, being no president, she is not entitled to a jurisdictional immunity.
Not that I needed to look it up, because it’s obvious that the quote is referring to injustice, to making up crimes. I guess you are sticking to making accusations without providing evidence. Read the FAQ, we are forum that uses evidence.
From Wikipedia, about the quote
It refers to the miscarriage of justice in the form of the abuse of power by the jurists, who could find any defendant guilty of “something”, if they so desired.[5][6][7]: 179 [8]: 85
The political class will pick and choose when and how laws will be applied and the punishment depending on the opposition’s realistic threat to power.
Other parties have been found guilty of the similar - the Socialist Party (PS) and the Democratic Movement (MoDem) of current Prime Minister François Bayrou were both found guilty in the last three years on such charge without the judgment handed out to Le Pen .
I’m going to slow you down a little greenie.
I think you know why.
Use your time to read the rules
It is not because, in China, justice is not independent, that it is the same in France.
The amount of money appropriated by PS and MODEM where roughly one tenth of the amounts appropriated by RN, and they were condemned to due proportion, including ineligibility.
1 Like
France joins romania germany and ukraine in disqualifying political opponents from elections
Bukele did what needed to be done. He managed to bring hope to a hopeless country. El Salvadorans are happy with him, so that’s really all that matters.
The most important things to remember in these situations is what works in the lands of soft White liberals does not work in the rest of the world, and there’s not a damn thing soft White liberals can do about it.
Prove it !!!
I have given facts and explanations to disprove your claim.
Almost all the French politicians disapproved the sentence, being afraid to be condemned, and they want to change the law.
You are so amazingly full of ignorance, and lies. Is there anything you ever write, that we can accept at face value, or has honesty become absolutely anathema in your world?
I’m not even gay, but I do know a bit about history.
Start with WIKI
The ancient Greeks did not conceive of sexual orientation as a social identity as modern Western societies have done. Greek society did not distinguish sexual desire or behavior by the gender of the participants, but rather by the role that each participant played in the sex act, that of active penetrator or passive penetrated.[8] Within the traditions of pederasty, active/passive polarization corresponded with dominant and submissive social roles: the active (penetrative) role was associated with masculinity, higher social status, and adulthood, while the passive role was associated with femininity, lower social status, and youth.[8]
The origin of the word ‘queer’
Queer is a word of uncertain origin that had entered the English language by the early 16th century, when it was primarily used to mean strange, odd, peculiar or eccentric. By the late 19th century it was being used colloquially to refer to same-sex attracted men. While this usage was frequently derogatory, queer was simultaneously used in neutral and affirming ways.
The examples provided in the Oxford English Dictionary show this semantic range, including instances of homosexual men using queer as a positive self-description at the same time as it was being used in the most insulting terms. …
Oh and I found another reason for you blindly despise Planned Parenthood - they defend human rights
Four Ancient Civilizations that Would Celebrate Pride Month
June 30, 2021 - By Bella - Planned Parenthood
During pride month, it’s common to see LGBTQ figures of history being celebrated, and they should! Being prideful of one’s own authenticity was rarely easy throughout history and it is so very important to appreciate those whose stories withstood the test of time. How far back does queer history date back, anyways?
The answer is complex, with many anthropological findings being seen through a whitewashed and evangelical lens, a lot of queer history seems to have been hidden.
However, with more modern historians, theorists, and anthropologists taking interest in this hidden history, it seems that LGBTQ+ individuals were present all throughout history. Instead of providing another list of Historical figures, I wanted to look into actual civilizations, where it was culturally acceptable to love whomever one desired, so here is a list of some ancient civilizations that would celebrate pride month.
Angola and West Africa …
Imperialist China …
Greece …
Rome …
Honorable mention: Ancient Egypt …
No kidding CC. The idea that:
Then some educated idiots thought that we needed gender roles.
is so removed from anything, I can’t figure out if they just doesn’t understand the words, maybe a typo, aphasia?
1 Like
Organizing.
If the rich would pay their fair share of taxes, none of that would would be an issue.
The working man paying for tax cuts for the rich is financial fraud.
For once, i partly agree.
University fees are overpriced, and some people profit from that.
At the beginning of the eighties, interest rates were very high.
Many student had to borrow too much money.
And after that, i will distinguish between
- the ex students who willingly did not try to reimburse the loans,
- the ex students who never earned enough to reimburse them
- those who did, either because they were helped by the firms they worked for, or by any other mean, heritage and so,
- those who did, earning much money and able to reimburse without any worry
- and those who did, depriving themselves and their families, of many things.
Not easy to find an equitable way to treat all of them.
But an automatic erasing of all loans is inequitable to the ex students as a whole, and to the tax payer.
What about the institutions pushing the loans?
I’ll admit, about all I know about student loans is that my son-in-law has made his payments religiously, even if it required my wife stepped in to make them. Two decades later, and I’m told he still owes over half of the original principle. That seems insane and clearly usury - paying every month and the principle barely moving down - He just has a regular degree, with no extended years and decades of college and a more degrees - now trawling the internet on this topic I’ve been surprise at how many Catholic related authors seem to be engage in rationalizing (and sure seem like defending current practices). People have a moral duty to pay their debts - ironic coming from the world’s oldest mega-corporate-empire. Guess the irony comes in when considering the Catholic Empire made their fortune sucking up other people’s treasure, by whatever means necessary.
By Ayelet Sheffey - Aug 23, 2021
… 2 borrowers describe the crushing interest that keeps them from paying off their debt
- High interest rates on student loans are keeping borrowers from paying off their initial debt loads.
- Insider spoke to two borrowers who are dealing with “crippling” student debt, largely due to interest.
- They both paid off nearly their full original debt amounts, but still owe thousands of dollars more.
https://minnesotareformer.com/2022/11/02/dont-cry-for-the-lenders-in-the-student-loan-fiasco/
… To wit: Lenders have been given a sweetheart deal in the student loan business, which encouraged them to make bad loans, knowing they’d be made whole in the end.
But these are the type of questions that should have been raised years ago , not when Biden decided to help at least one-third of Minnesotans with student loans zero them out.
The granddaddy of all moral hazard situations was the Financial Crisis of 2008 and the bank bailout that followed. Mortgage lenders and their Wall Street partners acted like drunken pirates at a casino, and there were hardly any consequences — for them anyway .
The quackers’ moral preening is also highly selective: Where were they a couple of years ago when the federal government doled out billions of taxpayer dollars in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans to businesses, non-profits and churches? That money was intended to cover payroll expenses, and if used as intended, the loan was forgiven. Most of the loans have been forgiven, many in the six and seven-figure range. In other words, people — and corporations are people, correct? — borrowed money taxpayer money knowing they would not be paying it back. Now that’s a moral hazard for someone to quack about.
Financial consultants and banks — many involved in selling student loans — enjoyed the PPP windfall, collecting significant fees for preparing and processing the loans. …
Guess it’s not ironic at all. It is the way of this world.
Oh and what a wonderful place we have been creating.
I better understand the matter. Shark loans are shark loans.
Does it belong to the state to pay them ?
Guess I’m wondering why the State allowed it to begin with?
But then guess the question becomes:
Is the State expected to protect people from the immoral and damaging behavior of predators?
We have a society that has clearly sided with a Me First moral foundation,
so it seems to me all bets are off in this brave new world.
I keep wondering, how will anything get fixed when no one agrees on anything anymore?
When everything and everyone can be second guessed, and having the loudest mega become king of the hill?
I am afraid that this whole list is true
Now, most amendments would have just reenforced existing laws.
But Republicans endorse their violations.