An exemple of Trump sense of morality.
Well he brands himself as a dictator.
Nayib Bukele is the president of El Salvador12345. He has been in office since June 1, 20192.
Bukele has styled himself as the “world’s coolest dictator” and the country’s "philosopher king"13.
He is a Salvadoran politician and businessman2
p.s. the little numbers behind the quote lead to the source of the quote.
.
You make every statement about me. Nothing about the subject matter.
Are you a troll?
OK. I have no problem with that.
A very nice action for our President to take.
A textbook operation of lawfare. Send in top attorneys from other states. And the prosecutors were still unable to produce a bill of indictment with multiple grand juries over eight years.
In a country where prosecutors can sentence a sandwich to jail for murder. And an innocent person has no chance for justice. The law fair actions kept her out of the political system for almost a decade. The same exact thing they were doing to trump.
There will no doubt be a book out about the actions of this type of lawfare.
People also say they talk to God. Doesn’t make it so.
Therefore it is you who is wrong!
I very well could be wrong. People who don’t make mistakes are probably not doing anything. Of course there is the exception of Jesus. All I can respond to you is that my viewpoint was mostly based upon AI. Therefore, the consensus of the people’s knowledge base you believe is wrong. Very well could be, you could be right.
This is where AI may have superior potentials. AI has the potential for original thoughts other than what is available "knowledge. It compiles information from all available sources and condenses it via logical algorithms into various solutions.
AI has the potential to generate new knowledge by suggesting innovative solutions and challenging established knowledge in some areas1. However, it does not create new knowledge in the same way humans do, as it identifies patterns and restates existing information in a new format2. AI can accelerate, mediate, and diffuse human knowledge3.
For instance AI beat the world champion at the board game of GO, a 3000 year old boardgame that has as many moves as stars in the universe.
The game of Go is one of the most popular games in the world. As a result of its elegant and simple rules, the game has long been an inspiration for mathematical research. Shen Kuo, an 11th century Chinese scholar, estimated in his Dream Pool Essays that the number of possible board positions is around 10^172. In more recent years, research of the game by John H. Conway led to the development of the surreal numbers and contributed to development of combinatorial game theory (with Go Infinitesimals[1] being a specific example of its use in Go).
I play go, i have read the story.
I will add that what surprised the most the best players in the world is that the AI used moves seen by doctrine as totally heterodox.
Point taken, a criminal has been pardoned, just because she was a staunch Trump supporter, and will be able to become again a judge, even without any law skills and knowledge. and you have no problem about that.
Your choice.
In my memory, you criticized Biden for pardoning his son ?
I can’t believe you said that. Do you understand how the system works? Do you know what a Bill of Indictment is? Apples to oranges.
No, you are. I responded to quite a bit of what you said, the substance. When you did what you always do, respond as if there is some other reality that you speak of but I don’t know exists, I got bored.
Any other true reason to pardon her ?
Trump said he would try and shut down lawfare. I really doubt if you have any idea what lawfare is due to the reason it has not been on the public radar until they used it to go after Trump. We have the Rule of Laws. Lawfare goes way beyond the Rules of Law. It is a byproduct of the technocritical government that has been ruling our nation for the last forty years. Lawfare is used by the big boys when it comes to controlling our legal system.
Comments like that are why I am dismissive of you
Do you know how the system of 'DUE PROCESS" works?
You don’t get to scoop people, alien or not, from the streets and send them to El Salvador without offering that person the right to a hearing. These people are not “prisoners of war”
We are not at war! That takes a “Declaration of War”. Show me a declaration of war!
1 Like
Sorry, being French, my knowledge of USA has limits. I did not knew the exact definition of due process and lawfare.
As i understand it, lawfare is the use of law against your political ennemies. Exactly what trump has promised to do.
Now, the matter is not lawfare, it is : " Has the woman committed the misdemeanor she has been found guilty of? "
If yes, lawfare or not, she deserves to be condemned, and don’t deserves to be a judge.
In France, Marine Le Pen, ultra-right leader, has appropriated 4, 4 millions of euros, from the European parliament, to finance her party, and some personal expenses. she has been condemned.
Her supporters have accused the judges who have condemned her of lawfare. It is a political defense, to make people forget the misdemeanor.
Lawfare can exist. But when the crime has been committed, justice must pass.
In fact, the due process has two meanings, of which one guarantees substantial rights (substantive due process) and the other face guarantees procedural rights (procedural due process).
I really hope this woman benefitted from the due process of law. If not, her condamnation is unjust.
Now, back to France, Marine Le pen criticized the slowness of the judicial processes, as the facts where from 2004 to 2016, and she was condemned in 2024.
As the prosecutors reminded her and the co-accused, they had used the due process of law, contesting 47 times the preparatory decisions and the police inquiries, up to the French supreme court.
Now back to Trump. He has been condemned, and declared guilty, more than once for his misdemeanors. You say that he is a victim of lawfare.
The true question is: was he guilty or not ?
If he was, was should not him have been condemned ? Why should he benefit from some judicial immunity ?
The basic principle is " Equality in front of law"
And I would say that the more politically ambitious and powerful you are, the more careful you should be to respect the law.
In France, and usually in Europe, to become a basic civil servant, tasked with basic tasks, you must have a clean criminal record. And it would not be the same to become a president?
1 Like
No, in US there is no such standard. It is the people who elect the president, regardless of personal history.
In France neither, but the laws says the judge can forbid you to be candidate to any election up to 10 years. In fact, the law is so framed that such a sanction must be decided, except with very good reasons.
Marine Le Pen has been forbidden to be candidate to any election for 5 years.
Last July, the Supreme Court ruled that a President could be immune from prosecution while doing “official acts”. It was chilling to hear lawyers arguing that he could literally murder someone if it was an official act. This case resulted in ongoing trials being shut down.
They, SCOTUS, left open that what acts are official could be considered, but, I’m pretty sure that meant they would rule in favor of Trump but not in favor of a President they didn’t like.
The other test of our Constitution is Trump pardoning himself. This also would be a Constitutional crisis, but we all know he would do it, so, in essence, we are already in that crisis.
Macron gets rids of his political opponents just like any good despot worthy of the title