So run the fucking show again and expect a different result? Absolutely nothing from you about her terrible policies or lack there of and her inability to energize the Democratic base.
@Player said:
So run the fucking show again and expect a different result? Absolutely nothing from you about her terrible policies or lack there of and her inability to energize the Democratic base??
I said
I hated Hillary.I hated her campaign.
I just about threw up when I heard the rumor she was considering running again.
Among the many reasons I disliked Hillary were her policies, lack thereof and inability to energize the Democratic base, and I was upset at the idea of her running because I did not want a repeat of 2016.
Are you unable to read for comprehension? I don’t think I need to spend 3 hours and go into every detail on the past. Unlike you, I’m over it.
I said
Absolutely nothing from you about her terrible policies or lack there of
You said
Among the many reasons I disliked Hillary were her policies, lack thereof and inability to energize the Democratic base,
first off - first time you have brought this up in the russiagate context. And again WHAT POLICIES.???
How much do You what me to spell it out FFS!!!
Read the thread. I did not bring up Hillary. You did.
I was responding to your comment.
I don’t really remember much about Hillary’s campaign from 2015 & 2016. Sorry. If you want to remember what her policies were, you can Google it. I don’t see how that relates to this particular thread.
“I don’t really remember much about Hillary’s campaign from 2015 & 2016. Sorry. If you want to remember what her policies were, you can Google it. I don’t see how that relates to this particular thread.”
Exactly the problem. You are such a fake
Bye
Ah, not having the yappity yap yap of Player constantly making obtuse aggressive comment phrases, is rather soothing.
The Hapless Russiagater Jamie Raskin
“We don’t have all the facts.”
Russian interfering in French election:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep21009.6.pdf
Five European Experiences With Russian Election Interference
Russian Election Interference: Europe’s Counter to Fake News and Cyber AttacksNetherlands: General Elections, March 2017
France: Presidential Election, May–June 2017
United Kingdom: Snap Election, June 2017
Germany: Federal Elections, September 2017
Sweden: General Elections, September 2018
Roger Stone and Russerr:
1:59 “I think he should tell the truth”
2:15 Why is the interviewer incapable of acknowledging Russian efforts to undermine our 2016 election?
2:40 Always impressive watching an interviewer step all over an attempt to answer then launch into a Gish gallop (actually his GG was already going strong.
If I told you what Max was behaving like, you’d have to complain that I used a reference to the stinkiest part of our anatomy to describe the impression Max’s badgering interview style made on me. But I can certainly see why you’d find that really impressive. It’s no longer about discussion, it’s about bullying. But, you’ll point out that’s how it’s always been, bullying for what we want. So let’s just roll up and die.
Trump is a freaken Russian “hoax” on American - he sure couldn’t have done what he did without Breitbart propaganda network and Russia running interference:
What happened to loving honesty???
zedenko77 you are another player, aren’t you?
Z, are you a Russian patriot?
In the flow of misinformation, it doesn’t matter how close you are to the source. The stream is released and it doesn’t change much by time it reaches you and me. Most people who pass it on are not getting paid, except in endorphins. There is a big pool of people who think the world has gone crazy and are glad to take an easy answer if one comes their way.
Not the world - just the west.
“are glad to take an easy answer if one comes their way.”
Aka answer for why the rise of the far right in elections across the world = russian meddling
More like Russia meddling, which has been observed for decades all over the world, by east and west, must be a fake story.
Yesterday it was 2016, today its decades , tomorrow will be centuries. Thats how conspiracy theories go
This is that frustrating point where facts don’t help. Any link i provide will only dig your heels in further. I would need to get to know you and find out where you got your values before we could begin to discuss reality. But that doesn’t interest you. Anonymity is more important to you than knowledge.
If I’m wrong, and the Yale history dept is wrong, then it would be you who should be interested in me and find a way to educate me, but, again, you have shown nothing but disdain, interest only in pointing out the flaws of others.
I like this new forum feature. Finding related threads from the past.
Now its qualms about the cold war . USSR wasnt robinson crusoe here. According to a study by Dov Levin, a political scientist at Carnegie Mellon University, there were 117 “partisan electoral interventions” by the US between 1946 and 2000, which accounted for almost 70% of all such interventions globally
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0738894216661190
I specifically mentioned one of the worst. This isn’t a contest about who is the worst superpower. How does that data affect the truth about the 2016 election?
You introduced shimer . 100 years of interference? Please.
Bring the 2016 data . I am going to need more than some offical quoting some investigators referring to some dirt on trump
I addressed this above. There is no way for me to know what data or how much you would need. You’re assuming we have the same ideas about valid sources and how to figure out what is true.
You havent provided convincing evidence of your claim.