Censor what?
citizenschallengev4:The way I see it, I was trying to offer bridges for communication
They read like challenges to me. A good way elicit an emotional response.
A challenge is still a simple challenge. Sure, my patience is running low and I get suckered into emotional response tit for tat - but you’ll not fine me stoop this low
I did not realize that cc4 does not have moderation rights here. Somehow I got the gist that he did.
I’m a newb. So that’s how far you let people go… possibly you are special, cc4. Sort of like Lebed…! "JERSEY CITY, N.J. — A prominent
leader of the Organization of Ukrainian
Nationalists (OUN) living in Yonkers,
N.Y., has been accused by The Village
Voice of being a Nazi collaborator.
The naming of Mykola Lebed, 75, as
a Nazi collaborator, arose with the
release of a 1985 GAO report in which
the former OUN leader, identified only
as “Subject D, " is described as “a certain
high-ranking Nazi collaborator, an
alleged war criminal,” The Voice reported.
The newspaper alleges that Mr.
Lebed, who is now retired, was let into
t h e Unite d State s because he was
considered “an extremely valuable
intelligence asset” by the U.S. Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA)”https://www.ukrweekly.com/archive/1986/The_Ukrainian_Weekly_1986-06.pdfThis is the sort of thing that you can really get behind, right? Or bend over for?
I am amazed at the level of information availability that we have which confronts the programmed positions. As I struggle with the problem of the programmable human; the propagandized versus the propagandist; the one crux that has to be clung to is a pledge to seek the truth, and I do believe that in that pledge there is a corollary which positions wee humans as merely having beliefs, which means that our certainty on matters will always deserve an open stance. Of course, that open stance is a defensive one rather than a receptive one. As they say in prison: keep your soap on a rope. The proof is in the pudding. Ooh, this is getting messy… Really, CC4, it might be time to stand up again. Certainly, I do anticipate censorship on this one, and I can’t wait to see how it feels. Give it to me… Thanks CC4 for all that you take.
As I struggle with the problem of the programmable human; the propagandized versus the propagandist; the one crux that has to be clung to is a pledge to seek the truth, and I do believe that in that pledge there is a corollary which positions wee humans as merely having beliefs, which means that our certainty on matters will always deserve an open stance. Of course, that open stance is a defensive one rather than a receptive one. As they say in prison: keep your soap on a rope. The proof is in the pudding. Ooh, this is getting messy… Really, CC4, it might be time to stand up again.
Lausten
I’m trying to be nicer, did you see …