. Most parents listen to whatever the doctor says because they don't realize that the doctor himself hasn't done his due diligence.Parents and others who believe that doctors have not done their due diligence, have not done their own due diligence on the medical profession. Doctors are much better informed than the anti-vaxxers are willing to give them credit for. Doctors can read the research and understand what would only leave the average parent scratching their heads.
Thanks for the post Doug but peacegirl only accepts anecdotal evidence that supports her own ideas. She prefers that we devaccinate and only use vaccines when the disease again rises to the level where more than a few people are dying from it as will certainly happen.
Thanks for the post Doug but peacegirl only accepts anecdotal evidence that supports her own ideas. She prefers that we devaccinate and only use vaccines when the disease again rises to the level where more than a few people are dying from it as will certainly happen.Right macgvver, your analysis is flawless. If we don't inject with 49 multi-dose vaccines (as recommended by the CDC) starting at birth through age 6, our children are going to die of some nasty disease. After all, all of these vaccinations are necessary (even though there was a threefold jump in the vaccine schedule in 1989 right at the time the government released the manufacturer from any kind of liability if a child should be injured or die -- makes you wonder, doesn't it? :lol:) have been proven to be safe and effective. Paul Offit told us so. We can inject 10,000 or 100,000 vaccines into our babies, he said, and they will be fine. The scare tactics being used won't work anymore. People are catching on to the lies! Let me begin by saying that I really don't enjoy writing about Paul Offit, although I've done it before in an open letter addressed to him, in response to an article praising him for trying to teach doctors how to combat "parents that question vaccines". I think he's a despicable human being that has no regard for the safety of the children he says he's trying to "save". Let's not forget, this is the same guy who co-invented the live virus Rota-virus vaccine; the one that is supposed to prevent your precious little one from getting a nasty but typically benign version of diarrhea that killed about 30 babies annually in the U.S before the vaccine was introduced. Now it actually kills more, for some reason. Dr. Offit's vaccine is given to your child at 2 months and 4 months, along with the DTaP(Diphtheria, Tetanus, & Pertussis), HiB(Influenza), Hep B 2(Hepatitis B), Pneumococcal(Pneumonia), and IPV(Polio). To put it in perspective, your child gets 8 different vaccines(per CDC recommended schedule) http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/ ,at only two months of age, and again at 4 months of age. If injecting foreign animal and human DNA into your newborn seems like a splendid idea, perhaps this excerpt from a news article in 2010 will dampen your rosy outlook: On May 7, 2010, the FDA announced that RotaTeq vaccine was contaminated with DNA from two porcine circoviruses: PCV1 and PCV2. To date the vaccine manufactuer, Merck, has not given any information regarding if, or when, PCV1 and PCV2 will be removed from this vaccine. Although PCV1 has not been associated with clinical disease in pigs, PCV2 is a lethal pig virus that causes immune suppression and a serious wasting disease in baby pigs that damages lungs, kidneys, the reproductive system, brain and ultimately causes death. The FDA recommended temorpary suspension of the use of Rotarix vaccine on March 22nd after DNA from PCV1 was identified in Rotarix, but did not call for suspension of the use of RotaTeq vaccine after PCV2 was found in RotaTeq. On June 1st, NVIC called on Merck to volunartarily withdraw RotaTeq from the market until PCV2, especially, is removed from the vaccine. RotaTeq vaccine is manufactured by Merck and was licensed by the FDA in 2006. Description: RotaTeq is a genetically engineered vaccine made of live, attenuated human-bovine hybridized reassortant rotaviruses. Other ingredients include sucrose, sodium citrate, sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate, sodium hydroxide, polysorbate 80, cell culture media, and trace amounts of fetal bovine serum. It does not contain preservatives. Yum, yum.. Anyone still want to wait in line to inject this concoction into your baby, to "prevent" a slightly possible case of Rota-virus? If so, I see I still have work to do here. Very well, let's consider a recent CDC study that proved that breast milk actually combats the live virus inside the vaccine. They found that women who breast feed their infants were much more likely to actually contain a natural "vaccine" for Rota-virus in their bodies. In other words, the vaccine is rendered ineffective in most cases because the natural super power of the breast milk actually defeats it, which of course means, if you're breast feeding, you really don't need to worry about your baby getting Rota-virus anyway. What's the point of the vaccine? Furthermore, the CDC study concluded with the notion that perhaps mothers should stop breast feeding during the time period of the vaccine administration so the "vaccine could be effective". I'll give you a minute to process that logic. At the risk of going too far down this rabbit hole and losing focus on what I set out to write, I'll conclude this section by saying that Paul Offit's Rota-virus vaccine is, in my humble opinion, and the opinion of many doctors, the most worthless vaccine on the market. Only the flu vaccine rivals it in sense-lacking, universally accepted stupidity. Still, he's made undisclosed millions on it. Merck reported paying $182 million for the patent, so we can assume he's living pretty handsomely, after splitting a percentage of the profits with his co-inventors. Don't forget his high paying gig at the Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia, whatever various venues pay him to come out and praise vaccines, plus his continued Merck Perks(sounds like a gas station club or something, doesn't it) - so it's understandable that Dr. Offit would continue to market his own and other vaccines as completely safe. In fact, he's been infamously quoted as saying that infants can handle 100,000 vaccines at the same time. No, that's not a typo. Apparently people thought it was, because when the understandable backlash occurred from making that statement, he altered his statement to something much less ridiculous: "Babies should theoretically be able to handle 10,000 vaccines at one time". http://www.dinnerforthought.com/blog/dr-paul-offits-kryptonite-underestimating-anti-vaxxers
http://www.dinnerforthought.com/blog/dr-paul-offits-kryptonite-underestimating-anti-vaxxers:lol:
Matt is a father, husband, and son. He is a conservative millennial, and focuses on family values and faith.:lol:
Matt began writing as a child ...No doubt the dummy was a vaccinated child, otherwise he might not be here to inflict his nonsense on readers. :coolgrin:
... and it quickly turned into one of his greatest passions.Oh, well, that makes him qualified to pontificate on vaccines, for sure! :lol:
He recently started a blog website to not only fulfill his own desire to write on topics he's passionate about, but to help other like minded people to see things they might not have seen before.Hey, peacegirl, maybe you ought to send him a copy of daddy dumdum's book! :lol:
http://www.dinnerforthought.com/blog/dr-paul-offits-kryptonite-underestimating-anti-vaxxers:lol:
Matt is a father, husband, and son. He is a conservative millennial, and focuses on family values and faith.:lol:
Matt began writing as a child ...No doubt the dummy was a vaccinated child, otherwise he might not be here to inflict his nonsense on readers. :coolgrin:
... and it quickly turned into one of his greatest passions.Oh, well, that makes him qualified to pontificate on vaccines, for sure! :lol:
He recently started a blog website to not only fulfill his own desire to write on topics he's passionate about, but to help other like minded people to see things they might not have seen before.Hey, peacegirl, maybe you ought to send him a copy of daddy dumdum's book! :lol: You are the most unreflective guy. You really have a problem dealing with the truth. You will put down anyone who doesn't agree with you. Just because he has more faith in the body's innate ability to heal rather than a vaccine manufacturer who has a profit motive does not make his knowledge inaccurate.
Thanks for the post Doug but peacegirl only accepts anecdotal evidence that supports her own ideas. She prefers that we devaccinate and only use vaccines when the disease again rises to the level where more than a few people are dying from it as will certainly happen.Right macgvver, your analysis is flawless. If we don't inject with 49 multi-dose vaccines ......blah ...blah...blah...blah...blah Another long winded post full of opinions none of us care about. Present some reliable data. How many times have I asked you for that now?
Thanks for the post Doug but peacegirl only accepts anecdotal evidence that supports her own ideas. She prefers that we devaccinate and only use vaccines when the disease again rises to the level where more than a few people are dying from it as will certainly happen.Right macgvver, your analysis is flawless. If we don't inject with 49 multi-dose vaccines ......blah ...blah...blah...blah...blah Another long winded post full of opinions none of us care about. Present some reliable data. How many times have I asked you for that now? None of us care about? Who are these people who don't care about their children and the possible danger of over-vaccination?
Thanks for the post Doug but peacegirl only accepts anecdotal evidence that supports her own ideas. She prefers that we devaccinate and only use vaccines when the disease again rises to the level where more than a few people are dying from it as will certainly happen.Right macgvver, your analysis is flawless. If we don't inject with 49 multi-dose vaccines ......blah ...blah...blah...blah...blah Another long winded post full of opinions none of us care about. Present some reliable data. How many times have I asked you for that now? None of us care about? Who are these people who don't care about their children and the possible danger of over-vaccination? Everyone cares about their children peacegirl which is why we vaccinate them. What we dont care about are the opinions of a bunch of bloviating self absorbed people with no science or data to back up their empty claims
peacegirl’s “thoughts” in action.]
Hope you are very proud of this sort of thing, peacegirl. At least your “thoughts” on light and sight don’t harm children.
Here ya go, peacegirl. This one’s for you. From here.] Eat this.
If you refuse to vaccinate your child for *any* reason beyond a known medical reason, such as belief and most definitely including religion, your child should be removed from your home, your parental rights irrevocably terminated without possibility of appeal, and if your child sickens another before that happens, you and your spouse should be tried for reckless endangerment and assault with a deadly weapon. I'm NOT kidding. I am serious as a heart attack. These diseases kill. We can prevent them. Those facts are not in dispute. Disease gives not one shit at all about beliefs. It doesn't have morality or ethics. It exists to spread. The ones we bother to create vaccines for are pretty serious illnesses, some with the potential to WIPE OUT HUMANITY. To expose your own child to such without anything but a natural defense is an abominably incompetent, careless, reckless, immoral, and inhuman act of such depravity, such awful idiocy, and such ruinous, piss-poor judgment that I have to wonder how such toolboxes as antivaxxers survived long enough to breed in the first place. But to expose somebody ELSE'S child to that, and without them knowing it, is an act of such monstrously callous disregard for human life and public safety that you should NOT be allowed to raise children if you refuse to vaccinate them. Diseases don't give two fucking shits about feelings and- in large part due to the behavior of the antivaxxers themselves- I don't give a shit about feelings on this, either. It's the only possible sane response to such a mindless threat. Diphtheria. In 2015. Jesus fucking wept.
Thanks for the post Doug but peacegirl only accepts anecdotal evidence that supports her own ideas. She prefers that we devaccinate and only use vaccines when the disease again rises to the level where more than a few people are dying from it as will certainly happen.Right macgvver, your analysis is flawless. If we don't inject with 49 multi-dose vaccines ......blah ...blah...blah...blah...blah Another long winded post full of opinions none of us care about. Present some reliable data. How many times have I asked you for that now? None of us care about? Who are these people who don't care about their children and the possible danger of over-vaccination? Everyone cares about their children peacegirl which is why we vaccinate them. What we dont care about are the opinions of a bunch of bloviating self absorbed people with no science or data to back up their empty claims We all have the same goal: to help keep our children safe, but the fact that you won't even hear the cries of parents who tell their unfortunate stories, is unfeeling and dangerous. Empirical observation is part of any scientific study, and parents are the most careful observers when it comes to their children. Their account of what happened when one day their child was fine and after the vaccine was not the same child needs to be taken seriously otherwise incomplete studies will trump anything a parent says, and this would be tragic.
We all have the same goal: to help keep our children safe, but the fact that you won't even hear the cries of parents who tell their unfortunate stories, is unfeeling and dangerous. Empirical observation is part of any scientific study, and parents are the most careful observers when it comes to their children. Their account of what happened when one day their child was fine and after the vaccine was not the same child needs to be taken seriously otherwise incomplete studies will trump anything a parent says, and this would be tragic.I agree we have the same goal but anecdotes are NOT an important part of scientific study. As stated previous they may be used as a starting point to initiate a study but anecdotes are not empirical evidence. Parents may be good observers in the sense that they notice small changes in their children but they are in most cases very poor scientists because they see patterns where they don't exist. They are unable to detach themselves and be objective. Objective studies should always trump what a parent or any individual says. What would be tragic would be to not allow that to happen and thereby allow inaccurate conclusions to lead to bad decisions which is what is gong on in the antivax community. This is a very simple concept but one that some people have a hard time accepting because they have too much faith in their own observations. Human history is replete with examples of where we went wrong because we allowed our conclusions to be drawn from personal observations that weren't confirmed with empirical evidence. There is no hope of a rational discussion on this subject if you don't understand this basic principal.
Peacegirl does not understand any of the methodologies of science. She does not know what confirmation bias is, she does not understand that correlation is not causation, she does not see why anecdotal evidence is worthless. Nor will she ever understand any of this.
We all have the same goal: to help keep our children safe, but the fact that you won't even hear the cries of parents who tell their unfortunate stories, is unfeeling and dangerous. Empirical observation is part of any scientific study, and parents are the most careful observers when it comes to their children. Their account of what happened when one day their child was fine and after the vaccine was not the same child needs to be taken seriously otherwise incomplete studies will trump anything a parent says, and this would be tragic.I agree we have the same goal but anecdotes are NOT an important part of scientific study. As stated previous they may be used as a starting point to initiate a study but anecdotes are not empirical evidence. Parents may be good observers in the sense that they notice small changes in their children but they are in most cases very poor scientists because they see patterns where they don't exist. They are unable to detach themselves and be objective. Objective studies should always trump what a parent or any individual says. What would be tragic would be to not allow that to happen and thereby allow inaccurate conclusions to lead to bad decisions which is what is gong on in the antivax community. This is a very simple concept but one that some people have a hard time accepting because they have too much faith in their own observations. Human history is replete with examples of where we went wrong because we allowed our conclusions to be drawn from personal observations that weren't confirmed with empirical evidence. There is no hope of a rational discussion on this subject if you don't understand this basic principal. I'm sorry but parents are scientists in this respect. How could you look parents in the eye who know, without a doubt, that the vaccine did the damage, and tell them that the pattern is in their heads and they have too much faith in what they're seeing because a study didn't confirm it. I understand that we as fallible people sometimes come to the wrong conclusion, but my question to you is if there is the slightest possibility that the parent was right, why would you suggest giving the child more and more vaccines (and refuse to take a conservative approach) dismissing the symptoms the child is already displaying. This is a warning sign but you would call it coincidence and not miss a step in your determination to jab that child one more time. Why is it that pediatricians continually tell parents it's okay to re-vaccinate their child even when the child is showing definite signs that something is wrong? Can you answer me that? For example, if a child has a high pitched cry after the pertussis vaccine, this is a serious warning that neurological damage is taking place. Doctors would tell parents it's nothing to worry about and continue on with the schedule. After a couple more shots, the child would be dead in his crib and the doctors would attribute it to SIDS. Is that crazy? If the parent hadn't have listened to their doctor, the child may still be alive. This is just one of many examples of negligence on the part of doctors. The sad part is it is legal to kill children with impunity.
Age of Autism Weekly Wrap: Somewhere Between Yikes! and Yawn
By Dan Olmsted
There’s an odd emotion I suspect many AOA readers share with me, a mix of “Holy Cow" and “Tell us something we don’t know" when new information clusters around the hypothesis that autism is an environmental disorder and, sorry to say it, vaccines are the main trigger.
Such was the case this week when Coy Barefoot, an autism dad, radio host and all-around great ally in Charlottesville, Virginia, sent an e-mail titled, “In case you hadn’t seen this." It was a link to a June 1 Science Daily report from the University of Virginia Health System. It begins:
“In a stunning discovery that overturns decades of textbook teaching, researchers at the University of Virginia School of Medicine have determined that the brain is directly connected to the immune system by vessels previously thought not to exist. That such vessels could have escaped detection when the lymphatic system has been so thoroughly mapped throughout the body is surprising on its own, but the true significance of the discovery lies in the effects it could have on the study and treatment of neurological diseases ranging from autism to Alzheimer’s disease to multiple sclerosis."
Autism. Haven’t parents and some professionals been saying for years that autism is an autoimmune and neurological disorder? How is this new study not strong support for the idea that goosing the immune system into dysregulation with vaccines is bad for the developing brain?
This comes on top of evidence we’ve known for years about the role the brain’s own immune cells may play in autism; in The Age of Autism, Mark Blaxill and I characterized the cause of autism as “a rash on the brain" from overstimulation of its immune cells due to, for example, the mercury in thimerosal-containing vaccines.
Mark agreed this new piece is of strong interest, but it certainly didn’t “overturn decades" of orthodoxy for us. Coy said it is “something of a smoking gun, don’t you think? A missing link between damage to the immune system and brain injury."
I do think that. And I was reminded of a comment by Dr. Brian Jepson I came across this week to the effect that calling autism a developmental disorder is like calling a hammer blow to the skull a headache. There are specific processes going on that result in the injury known as autism (and other issues) in vulnerable children, and those processes are pretty clear by now to all but the all genes/no real increase crowd (read: mainstream medicine and media).
So, like wow, that’s interesting. But like, yeah, we already had the basic idea a lot clearer than the experts.
Age of Autism
MY UNVACCINATED CHILDREN ARE ALIVE AND MY VACCINATED SON IS DEAD
BY:- Stephanie Messenger
This is my journey….
I can’t say I believed in vaccination. I knew nothing about it, but had it done anyway. It’s what you do, right? You do what doctors and baby health clinics tell you and what your parents and the media advise you to do. Well I did it, without so much as a question or thought into it. Within moments of my son receiving his immunisations he was screaming. This continued for most of the day and when he wasn’t screaming he was crying. This was unusual as he was a very happy, placid baby, who was already rolling over at 8 weeks and gooing and gahing at the first sight of his mother. The doctor told me his reactions were ’normal’ and he’d be OK in a couple of days.
After the first day he had almost recovered with only some irritability and restlessness noticeable. As the weeks passed he continued to reach milestones and all appeared Ok.
At 4 months of age I dutifully took him for his next round of vaccinations. This time he screamed louder and I could not console him at all. I would breastfeed him, only to have him projectile vomit it back up and still the screaming continued. He had never before vomited at all, ever. After he had vomited 2 feeds I called the doctor and told her what was happening and she said to stop breastfeeding and give him juice only. He kept some of it down but still vomited often.
The next day I called the doctor and told her I think the vaccines have done this and she told me ’ no, it’s just a coincidence’ but to bring him back in, which I did. She referred me to a specialist. While waiting for the specialist appointment in a few days, my baby boy started doing strange things. He started arching his back and crying out in pain. He was as stiff as a board. His eyes would roll into the back of his head. He didn’t have a temperature. He had also started shuddering but he wasn’t cold. (I later learnt from the doctor these were convulsions and seizures). The vomiting continued and I was convinced to give up breastfeeding by the clinic sister. He vomited up the formula also. I was getting very scared.
We went to the specialist appointment and he took some blood for tests and then we had to wait. His symptoms continued and after several days word came from the specialist that the tests showed he was allergic to wheat. I stopped giving him the cereal I had started him on weeks before, but none of the symptoms went away. (when I thought about it later, it was actually rice cereal anyway)
I decided to move to a large city to get more help. Once I saw a doctor there he was immediately admitted to hospital for a battery of test – many of which were conducted under anaesthetic, which of course required my signature to say I have been notified that my baby could die while under. I had not been advised of this, but I signed it not knowing all the medical jargon as I needed to get my baby well again and trusted they knew what they were doing.
By this time my dear little son had lost a lot of weight and nothing I was doing (under advice from doctors and baby health clinics) was working.
After months of tests in the hospital (he stayed there) we were summoned in to an office to be told that they ’didn’t know why my baby was deteriorating, but they estimate he will pass away within a couple of months’.
Soon after I took my baby home to die.
It was an interesting time. You don’t notice things have changed that much when you are with someone everyday. I would go shopping and people would not look at my baby, but rather look the other way. I remember going into the butcher and ordering what I wanted. The butcher refused to take my money as his eyes were transfixed on my son. I didn’t understand any of this. Just people behaving strangely I thought. I didn’t realise how sick he looked – much like the starving babies on T.V. we are now used to seeing in African countries.
My dear little boy was no longer rolling over, gooing or gahing, in fact he wasn’t doing anything anymore. He was now over one year of age and had not progressed past 4 months of age, when he had his last immunisations. He had in fact regressed to a newborn state, although now he was the length of a toddler. I carried him around in a sling close to my heart and waited for the day he would leave me forever.
When blood started coming from his mouth and I was not getting much sleep at all so I could watch over him, he was admitted to hospital again. He passed away a few weeks later. Vaccination killed him, I have no doubt. If he crawled under the sink and drank the same poisonous concoction of heavy metals, formaldehyde, foreign proteins, multiple viruses and a host of other toxins, the emergency room would have called it poisoning. Because it was injected into his body, it’s called ’a coincidence’! Funny about that, and I have since met many parents with similar stories.
A few years passed and I went on to have another child. This time
I was not going to be complacent. I had over the years researched the vaccination issue at length. I read the product inserts and found the reactions all printed there so my suspicions were confirmed by the drug company (the makers of the product) even if not by the doctors.
I had been lied to and my concerns about his immunisations were never followed up in any way. They were met with denials and due to my blind faith in the medical profession I didn’t question.
I have since gone on to read hundreds of books, some written by very courageous doctors who have bothered to investigate this issue thoroughly, read medical journals and also watched some DVD’s done by doctors all to warn parents about the dangers of vaccination.
I have 3 healthy, totally unvaccinated children, who have never had a childhood disease. Unlike their vaccinated friends who have often succumb to the diseases they have been vaccinated against. I kept these children fit and well using what is provided by nature – natural foods, clean water,
sunshine, clean air, exercise, adequate sleep and a loving and nurturing environment.
A few simple facts for people to check out:
- Japan stopped vaccinating young babies and their SIDs rate plummeted to near none. SIDS in Australia mostly happens at 2, 4 and 6 months – a coincidence – I think not, some will definitely be vaccination deaths!
- The U.S.A. has paid out billions in compensation for vaccine injury. Why do doctors here deny it is happening – are they scared of being sued?
- There is absolutely NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF a raised antibody level equals immunity. Apparently doctors want scientific proof of reactions, yet there is no scientific proof a raised antibody level gives immunity. There is proof it does not, when most of the cases of whooping cough are in the vaccinated as they are for this current epidemic.
It saddens me to know there are thousands of babies out there being damaged, disabled or lost every year and they have no voice to stand up against the powerful drug companies and, what is now an industry, and scarcely a profession – medicine.
I suggest you all look up the definition of safe and effective. You will soon learn it does not say what doctors and drug companies would have us believe. While we have a system when vaccine side effects are denied and played down and the risk of the disease is exaggerated we will never really know the true risk / benefit ratio. But remember, the risk was 100% when damage happens to your child!
There is so much information out there now from people who do not have a vested interest in vaccinations – I suggest you look into it thoroughly and put your fears to one side.
Education conquers fear.
If my son’s purpose on this earth was to teach me to be a better, more responsible parent, he succeeded. Had he not lived and died, I would possibly still be the complacent parent I was when I took him to be immunised. For that, I, and his brothers and sister are forever in his debt. Maybe one day, I’ll get to thank him. In the meantime I wonder what he would be like today. When I was placing a 21st key around his headstone I could only be sorry I wasn’t placing it around his neck.
My unvaccinated children are alive and well and my vaccinated child is dead! That’s what I know and live with every day.
Yours in health and wellbeing,
Stephanie Messenger
MY UNVACCINATED CHILDREN ARE ALIVE AND MY VACCINATED SON IS DEAD
Stephanie Messenger makes me sick.]
:lol:
Me, too. And before she’s done with her vile work she may make lots of children sick.
I wonder, peacegirl, as with your light and sight flapdoodle, do you think you are fooling anyone in a place like this? To really do damage and threaten the health of children, you need to take this stuff to echo-chamber woo sites where deluded people think like you do.
MY UNSEATBELTED CHILDREN ARE ALIVE AND MY SEATBELTED SON IS DEAD!
BY Stephanie Mushwit
This is my journey…
I can’t say I believed in seatbelts. I knew nothing about them, because I am too fucking stupid to independently inform myself, but I put my child in a seatbelt. It’s what you do, right? You do what the government and the car industry tell you and what your parents and the media advise you to do. Well I did it, without so much as a question or thought into it. Within moments of my crashing our SUV into a light pole because I was drunk, my boy, restrained by the seatbelt, was crying and screaming. Later, I noticed burns on his skin from where the belt, this foreign material, cruelly dug into him.
Within six months this very healthy, placid baby was dead. The doctors said that he had a rare genetic disorder, but I know it was the seatbelt.
Today I have 3 healthy, totally unseatbelted children. I still drive drunk, but have not had an accident with my children in the SUV. I know if I do, however, and they go crashing face-first through the windshield, their faces dotted with shards of glass and their skin torn to bloody shreds, this will be good for them. Their natural immune system will shield them from harm. The million bits of glass in their flesh will have a salutary effect. Please see my new book geared toward the gullible, “Melanie’s Marvelous Millions Bits of Glass in Her Face.” Thanks for buying, because I profit from it!
Yours in Wellbeing, Stephanie Mushwit
:lol:
Stephanie Messenger makes me sick.] :lol: Me, too. And before she's done with her vile work she may make lots of children sick. I wonder, peacegirl, as with your light and sight flapdoodle, do you think you are fooling anyone in a place like this? To really do damage and threaten the health of children, you need to take this stuff to echo-chamber woo sites where deluded people think like you do.A place like this? This place doesn't hold any special key to truth. To hate a mother who lost her child and is telling her story is disgusting.