Palestinians and science

You don’t know that for certain yet, because the election has not happened yet.

I know what i can see and i know that 70 % of americans think that biden is not mentally fit to be president and i know that no incumbent has won with a low approval rating of 36 %

Right. You are probably looking at dummy polls made by Repugs who support the dotard and attract those who favour the dotard and not Dems. You cannot rely on those stats to predict what happens during the actual election.

This is what I mean by you can’t trust them. This morning NPR said Biden was beating the dotard by 2 points. And also let me correct you on something. What you are calling “polls” are not actual or even real polls. They are surveys, dummy polls, general asking of anyone who comes along who they would vote for if the election was today and most people who frequent Repug sites are Repugs. Most people who frequent Dem sites are Dems. Then you you have survey crashers- Repugs who crash Dem sites and take their surveys to change the results of that survey. These “polls” as you call then are not only not real polls, but easily manipulated and do reflect what will actually happen on election day.

These are the sort of responses you put up that make me not trust you. I looked up that NPR report and it states

"Well, I mean, the poll that we conducted with PBS NewsHour and Marist has Biden ahead of Trump 50 to 48 but Trump ahead 43-42 when third parties are introduced. And all of that is firmly within the margin of error, but it shows that the race really hasn’t changed all that dramatically since the debate, at least nationally. We’re just in a really polarized environment. Even the polls that have shown Biden down since the debate are mostly within the margin of error.

Now, it’s likely a different story in the swing states"

Why cant you be honest and say it like it is?

I think everyone here knows how statistics work, and what a margin of error is. There’s no dishonesty here. Two points is two points, it’s a poll.

1 Like

We called that cherry picking . She deliberately avoided to mention the impact of independents and situation in swing states

It’s just forum. We aren’t journalists. Lighten up dude.

Calling it as i see it.

I was honest.

This puts President Biden ahead by 2.

This is with third parties and it’s just one point. That and if people want to throw away their vote, third party votes are pointless, because they rarely if ever win and election in the States. So that part is meaningless.

The statement was not false in and of itself. As usual, you are calling it from an accusatory perspective.

1 Like

The dems cant afford to lose voting people .to third parties., especially now that trump will surge further ahead in the polls after today

You still can acknowledge the situation in swing states

I said cherry picked. Not to mention how she said she rejected polls yet cited one to support her claim

How are you so sure he did? I seriously doubt an assassination attempt is going to cause a surge. What you are showing is hope that it will.

Only to show you that you can’t take survey polls or dummy polls seriously. They mean nothing.

What are those polls? Where the polls right in 2018? 2020? 2022?

The elections during those years showed Democratic gains all over .

And Republican congress did NOTHING, except weaponize the justice and the legislative departments.

Polls were right mriana

They are not actual polls and cannot predict the outcomes of the actual election.

The polls were right in predicting the outcome in 2018, 2020 and 2022

I never look at the dummy polls because they mean nothing. It’s a coin toss as to whether or not they are right or not. Or equivalent to tarot cards. Even then there is a chance of being right some of the time. Again they mean nothing and the ones I saw, they were wrong. They kept saying Obama was going to lose both times. Guess what? He won.