Fox News, at apex of 'ecosystem of disinformation.'

Will this develop into something meaningful?
Will the maga monster disinformation outlet FOX be brought to their knees?

Jan 20, 2023

Jeremy Peters, media and politics reporter for The New York Times, and David Plouffe, former Obama campaign manager, about the $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, for which Rupert Murdoch is sitting for a two-day deposition, and the corrosive effect Fox News has had on U.S. politics and Murdoch’s media empire has had on politics around the world.

Here’s an interesting examination of how we got here, that is, the hideous state of US societal-mental-health-&-civility index.

After spending a few thousand words examining primary causes for the past half century slide into politics by tactical slander, ruthless disregard for honesty & truth, bent on emotionalizing and raising gut passions of resentment & hatred, rather than rational problem solving, learning, critical thinking, honest/good-faith debate cooperation, pluralism - Kevin Drum gets down to brass tack and focuses on FOX. Something that’s been obvious from it’s first few seasons, and one of those things sleepy Democratic Party didn’t take seriously.
Nor did Democratic Party do anything to establish a system to expose and confront the deliberate falsification of scientific facts, and the general manufacturing of “facts to suit” that FOX was practising, right from the gitgo.

KEVIN DRUM - September+October 2021
We are at war with ourselves, but not for the reasons you think.

Americans sure are angry these days. Everyone says so, so it must be true.
But who or what are we angry at ? …

So What’s Changed?

It can’t really be social trends, since most of them have improved too. And most of the specific issues that might cause alarm—immigration, racism, and more—are unlikely candidates on their own. They may be highly polarizing, but in a concrete sense they haven’t gotten worse since 2000. In fact, they’ve mostly gotten better.

To find an answer, then, we need to look for things that (a) are politically salient and (b) have changed dramatically over the past two to three decades. The most obvious one is Fox News.

When it debuted in 1996, Fox News was an afterthought in Republican politics. But after switching to a more hardline conservatism in the late ’90s it quickly attracted viewership from more than a third of all Republicans by the early 2000s. And as anyone who’s watched Fox knows, its fundamental message is rage at what liberals are doing to our country.

Over the years the specific message has changed with the times—from terrorism to open borders to Benghazi to Christian cake bakers to critical race theory—but it’s always about what liberal politicians are doing to cripple America, usually with a large dose of thinly veiled racism to give it emotional heft.

If you listen to this on a daily basis, is it any wonder that your trust in government would plummet? And on the flip side, if you’re a progressive watching what conservatives are doing in response to Fox News, is it any wonder that your trust in government might plummet as well? … { to read the entire article link }

In the spirit of Democracy requires and informed and engage citizenry, I’m updating this thread.

By Jeremy Barr and Rachel Weiner - Updated February 17, 2023

… And of Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, Fox’s prime-time roster seemed to share a common opinion during these fraught weeks.

He’s “acting like an insane person,” wrote Sean Hannity, star of the network’s 9 p.m. show, while his 10 p.m. colleague Laura Ingraham concurred: “Such an idiot.”

The messages are part of a cache of internal correspondence and deposition testimony released Thursday in a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against the network filed by Dominion Voting Systems, one of the two election software companies at the center of the conspiracy theories. …

US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs,
> v.
> FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC, Defendant.

Case No. N21C-03-257 EMD

CONSOLIDATED PUBLIC VERSION FILED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES V
INTRODUCTION 1
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 14

A. DominionVotingSystems …….15
B. Prior to Election Day: Setting Up the False Narrative of Fraud……. 16
C. Fox’s Election Day Coverage and Backlash……. 18
D. Election Fraud Conspiracy Theories Abound and Soon Target Dominion……. 20
E. Fox Calls the Election for Biden and Mainstreams the False Narrative that Dominion
Rigged the Election……. 23
F. Fox Continues to Woo Back Viewers and Goes on War Footing with Newsmax… 26
G. This Dominion shit is going to give me a fucking aneurysm……. 29
H. Pressure on Fox Grows Even As Dominion Puts Fox on Notice……. 32
I. Fox Participated in the Narrative……… 39

LEGAL STANDARD……. 44

ARGUMENT……. 46

I. The Defamatory Statements Fox Published About Dominion Are False……. 46

A. Undisputed Evidence Proves the Falsity of Fox’s Statements……. 49

  1. Dominion Did Not Commit Election Fraud by Rigging the 2020 Presidential Election. ……… 50
  2. Dominion’s Software and Algorithms Did Not Manipulate Vote Counts in the 2020 Presidential Election……. 63
  3. Dominion Is Not Owned by a Company Founded in Venezuela to Rig Elections for the Dictator Hugo Chavez……. 73
  4. Dominion Did Not Pay Kickbacks to Government Officials Who Used Its Machines in the 2020 Presidential Election…… 76

B. Fox’s Accused Statements Are Actionable Allegations of Fact……. 78

II. The Accused Fox Statements Are “Of and Concerning” Dominion……. 78
III. Fox Published the Defamatory Statements……. 82
IV. The Statements Are Defamatory Per……… 85
V. Fox Acted with Actual Malice .87

The Public Record and Dominion’s Communications Demonstrate Fox’s Knowledge of or Reckless Disregard for the Truth……. 92
B. It was Widely Known within Fox that the Allegations were False……. 96
C. Executives Responsible for Fox Programming and Content Acted with Actual Malice… 101

  1. Fox Has Admitted that Its Executives Participated in the Editorial Process for the Accused Broadcasts During the Relevant Timeframe……. 101
  2. Fox Has Admitted Editorial Discussion of the Accused Programs Occur at Fox’s Twice-Daily Meetings Among Senior Editorial Leadership……. 102
  3. Specific Evidence Confirms These Fox Executives Acted With Actual Malice……. 104

D. Hosts, Producers, and Executives with Responsibility for Each Broadcast Knew the Statements were False or Recklessly Disregarded the Truth……. 117

  1. Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo……. 117
  2. LouDobbsTonight……. 123
  3. Justice with Judge Jeanine….… 135
  4. Fox & Friends……. 139
  5. Hannity’s November 30 Broadcast….… 141
  6. Tucker Carlson Tonight’s January 26 Broadcast……. 144

E. Additional Evidence Indicates that Fox’s Executives Acted with Actual Malice……. 148

  1. Inherent Improbability/Reliance on Obviously Unreliable Sources……. 148

  2. Financial Motive to Lie 153

  3. Departure from Journalistic Standards 158

  4. Preconceived Narrative. 159

  5. Rebroadcast and Refusal to Retract. 161

VI. Affirmative Defenses: DominionIs Entitled to SummaryJudgment Fox’s Neutral Reportage or Newsworthiness Defense and its Fair Report Defense……. 161

A. The Neutral Reportage Privilege Does Not Apply As A Matter of Law……. 163

  1. The Neutral Reportage Privilege Is Foreclosed by New York Law……. 165
  2. Federal Constitutional Law Does Not Recognize A “Neutral Reportage” Privilege. 165
  3. Fox’s Case for Neutral Reportage Has Only Gotten Weaker Since the Court’s Motion to Dismiss Ruling……. 167

B. Even if the Edwards Doctrine Did Apply, Fox Cannot Meet Its Requirements……. 169

C. The Narrow and Well-Defined “Fair Report” Privilege Likewise Does Not Apply……. 172

  1. The Court Already Correctly Held That the Fair Report Privilege Applies Only to Substantially Accurate Reports of Pending Proceedings……. 172
  2. None of the Defamatory Statements Is a Substantially Accurate Report of Pending Proceedings……. 174

CONCLUSION……. 176

As they say the plot thickens.
The tragedy is, FOX has been focused on brainwashing people with fabricate hostility and slander and lying about scientific facts since it’s inception,
been easy to watch, especially in the years I worked construction and got to listen to the crap daily.

So much time spent on creating strife and counter productive choices . . .

It’s good that at least a part of it is being exposed.

I find something macabre about profiting from the exploitation of anger.
It’s like stories of wraiths that feed on emotional distress and the greater the distress the more powerful the wraith becomes.

Wraiths from a shaman’s view[edit]

A wraith is a creature that is usually, but not always, created by and feeding off of the negative emotions, such as fear, anger, and jealousy, among others, but remain in this world, even after the emotions have subsided. They are more powerful than demons or ghosts, and will feed off of either one if the opportunity presents itself, so it is extremely rare that a wraith will occupy the same building with either a ghost or a demon.
Talk:Wraith - Wikipedia

Reminds me Citizen Kane movie, when Kane prefers the lie to the truth in his newspaper and claims he lost election by fraud.

In my memory, he burns the oath of truth he signed when young.

Fox was knowingly marketing the equivalent of a defective and/or fraudulent product and should be liable for any and all damages resulting from their reckless and dishonest practices.

What happens when a group of Fox News viewers watch CNN for a month?

Polls have previously shown that viewers of Fox News, the most-watched cable news channel in the US, are far more likely to believe the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen than the average American, and are more likely to believe falsehoods about Covid-19.

In an unusual, and labor intensive, project, two political scientists paid a group of regular Fox News viewers to instead watch CNN for a month. At the end of the period, the researchers found surprising results; some of the Fox News watchers had changed their minds on a range of key issues, including the US response to coronavirus and Democrats’ attitude to police.

The findings suggest that political perspectives can be changed – but also reveals the influence partisan media has on viewers’ ideology.

The extent of the network’s influence on American politics was highlighted this week, with a report that Joe Biden has privately referred to Rupert Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, as “the most dangerous man in the world” and “one of the most destructive forces in the United States”.
more… What happens when a group of Fox News viewers watch CNN for a month? | Media | The Guardian

Seems to me that “Free Speech” must be protected if “True”, but “False Speech” cannot claim such privilege. That is the equivalent of “fraud”.

Hmmm, that’s a pretty sound argument.

Now it only needs enough people to care about it, to do anything substantive about it.

Matter is who decides what is the truth ?

In dictatorships, the power decides what is the truth and people who say otherwise are condemned, as nowadays, in Russia.

As for truth v. lies, one could write books about it.

… In her essay Truth and Politics, published in The New Yorker in 1967, the philosopher Hannah Arendt was already lamenting the fact that politics and truth don’t mix. But even Arendt was aware that not all lies are the same. There are lies that are minimal forms of deception, a micro-tear in the fabric of reality, while some lies are so big that they require a complete rearrangement of the whole factual texture, a shift to another reality. In today’s terminology, Arendt was alerting us to the difference between a lie, and the 2016 Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year – “post-truth”.

One way to understand the difference between lies and post-truth, which I’ve written about in a new paper, is that a liar denies specific facts that have precise coordinates in space and time, whereas post-truth questions the very nature of truth.

A liar knows the truth, and, by trying to persuade us of an alternative narrative, a liar is paradoxically honouring the truth,
whereas post-truth allows no last refuge for the truth. …

intersting article,

… Clinton lied, and that was inexcusable. But Trump’s relationship with truth is even more disturbing, and dangerous. Trump’s incessant accusations of fake news against the main media outlets, including the Washington Post, The New York Times, and CNN, reflects a longstanding disdain for the truth. …

FOX was on a “War footing” and in fear of losing view shares to Newsmax’s “alternate universe” …

LEGAL UPDATES

Lies and misinformation have severely damaged our company and diminished the credibility of U.S. elections, subjecting hardworking public officials and Dominion employees to harassment and death threats. Dominion is taking steps to right these wrongs through our judicial system.

COMPLAINT & COURT FILINGS: DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST FOX CORPORATION

Jun 21, 2022 - Court Denial to Dismiss (PDF)
Jan 28, 2022 - Dominion Opposition to Fox Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss (PDF)
Nov 8, 2021 - Download Complaint (Fox Corporation) (PDF)

COMPLAINT & COURT FILINGS: DEFAMATION SUITS AGAINST NEWSMAX MEDIA INC., ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK, AND PATRICK BYRNE

Nov 7, 2022 - Order to Dismiss OAN Request for Dismissal (PDF)
Nov 7, 2022 - Memorandum Opinion by Court for OAN Request for Dimissal (PDF)
Jun 16, 2022 - Court Denial to Dismiss (Newsmax Media Inc.)(PDF)
Apr 20, 2022 - Denial of Patrick Byrne’s Motion to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuits (PDF)
Dec 15, 2021 - Dominion Opposition to Patrick Byrne’s Motion to Dismiss (PDF)
Aug 10, 2021 - Download Complaint (Newsmax Media Inc.) (PDF)
Aug 10, 2021 - Download Complaint (One America News Network) (PDF)
Aug 10, 2021 - Download Complaint (Patrick Byrne) (PDF)

RELATED NEWS:

COMPLAINT & COURT FILINGS: DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST FOX NEWS NETWORKS, LLC

Jan 31, 2022 - Denial of Fox News’s Effort to Obtain an Interlocutory Appeal of the Motion to Dismiss (PDF)
Dec 16, 2021 - Denial of Fox News Networks’ Motion to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuit (PDF)
Mar 26, 2021 - Download Complaint (Fox News Networks, LLC) (PDF)

RELATED NEWS:

COMPLAINT & COURT FILINGS: DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST MIKE LINDELL

Oct 3, 2022 - Denial of Request for U.S. Supreme Court to Consider Appeal, Dominion Defamation Suit to Proceed Against MyPillow/Mike Lindell (PDF)
Jan 24, 2022 - Joint Meet & Confer Report to Court (PDF)
Aug 11, 2021 - Denial of Powell, Giuliani and Lindell’s Motions to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuits (PDF)
Feb 22, 2021 - Download Complaint Against MyPillow Inc. and Mike Lindell (PDF)

RELATED NEWS:

COMPLAINT & COURT FILINGS: DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST RUDY GIULIANI

Aug 11, 2021 - Denial of Powell, Giuliani and Lindell’s Motions to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuits (PDF)
Jan 25, 2021 - Download Complaint (Rudy Giuliani) (PDF)

RELATED NEWS:

COMPLAINT & COURT FILINGS: DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST SIDNEY POWELL AND RELATED PARTIES

Sept 28, 2022 - Court Order Granting Dominion’s Motion to Dismiss Countersuit Claim (PDF)
Aug 11, 2021 - Denial of Powell, Giuliani and Lindell’s Motions to Dismiss Defamation Lawsuits (PDF)
Jan 25, 2021 - Download Complaint (Sidney Powell)
(PDF)

RELATED NEWS:

RELATED INFORMATION

TEXAS STATE BAR SUES SIDNEY POWELL FOR PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT IN 2020 ELECTION CASES

March 9, 2022 - Download Complaint (PDF)

FEDERAL JUDGE DISCIPLINES “KRAKEN” LAWYERS OVER MICHIGAN ELECTION LAWSUIT

Aug 11, 2021 - Download Court Order (PDF) | Related Documents

FEDERAL JUDGE DENIES POWELL, GIULIANI, AND LINDELL’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS DEFAMATION LAWSUITS

Aug 11, 2021 - Download Court Order (PDF)

FEDERAL JUDGE GRANTS SANCTIONS MOTION IN “FANTASTICAL” ELECTION LAWSUIT AGAINST DOMINION & OTHERS

08/04/21 - Download Court Order (PDF)

DOMINION RESPONSES TO ARIZONA SENATE SUBPOENA / PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST

Aug 2, 2021 - Download Subpoena Response (PDF)
Aug 2, 2021 - Download Public Records Response (PDF)

Dominion has also sent preservation request letters to more than 150 other individuals and news organizations.

RETRACTION ISSUED BY AMERICAN THINKER



Court brief exposes Fox News fear of fickle, Trump-supporting audience - MSNBC


The most prominent stars and highest-ranking executives at Fox News privately ridiculed claims of election fraud in the 2020 election, despite the right-wing channel allowing lies about the presidential contest to be promoted on its air, damning messages contained in a court filing revealed. CNN’s Sunlen Serfaty reports.

Just as in science. That which can be proven to be true.

That which cannot be proven to be true must submit to critical review in court.

I am talking about speech that has direct and major consequences (impact) on policy and or financial harm.

so called democracies lie everyday to their people. They lie about war, lie about action to combat climate change , lie about the economy, lie about the level of corruption, lie about caring for the working poor.
So dont give me your garbage that this only happens under dictatorships

Under a dictatorship there is no “freedom of the press”.
At least in a democracy one is allowed to print truth under the guaranteed 'freedom of the press".

So don’t give me your garbage that this is not true in a democracy. You just engaged in a fraudulent claim

Yes, in democracy, powers lies and is corrupt.

Yes in democracy, there is freedom of the press and one can denounce the power without being jailed.

In USA, one could call Trump a lier, a corrupt man and a cheater and not go to jail. In Russia, if you name Putin that you go to jail. In Russia, if you say that Russia is waging an unjust war against Ukraine and that it is committing crimes against humanity you go to jail.

But, in both system, the propaganda of the elites, when they agree can be destructive.

A majority of Russian share the dream of Putin, rebuilding the soviet empire, and a majority of American believed that the second war against Saddam Hussein was necessary.

Each time the lies have heavy consequences.

Sometimes, not lying but just keeping silent can : The major gas companies knew since the middle of the seventies that global warming would happen and its consequences. They did not say anything to protect their profits.

That shows that being allowed to speak and print is not enough. One must accede to the information.

1 Like

Yes, but in order to be able to accede to information the information must be available. Therefore, democracy is preferable over dictatorship, always.

Yes, “ecosystems of disinformation” may crop up, but then there may be a price to pay. I bet Dominion will win their court case and own a big chunk of Fox.
That may teach them a lesson. They may even return to report the news as it happens … wouldn’t that be nice.

rubbish- prove it.

The only difference with liberal democracies is the illusion of freedom because the rich and powerful only know too well the words of george orwell that telling the truth is a revolutionary act

Your solution is just rolling up and embracing hopelessness.
It’s exactly your sort of Dead-End Cynicism that cripples democracies,
and gives the dictatorial ultra rich their power.

I suppose, on top of everything else, you’re a proud non-voter?

Ohh, the irony.
Metalhead really doesn’t see that he is the sort of Dead-End-Cynic who cripples democracies.

Not a single hint at a possible solution or improvement. Just whining and hand wringing.

Telling truth is a revolutionary act as compared to what?

You got to acknowledge that there is a problem first before solutions can be discussed. You aint at first base yet