Evolution disproved by one sentence

Ok this guy is kind of humorous, and correct. Although, I am not sure that he knows the maximum length of a sentence.
How does Darwinian evolution explain that humans have more genes in common with the mouse, than with the great apes?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1jPSN-cY-w
Well if CNN says so, it’s got to be true. http://edition.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/04/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome/

Your you tube source is a funny kid who can’t seem to keep his hat on straight, and may have a belief system influenced by a conversion to Islam.
sigh… but consider that all mammals share common genes (all being a product of evolution). Also, sharing similar genes is not the same as having the same DNA.
One other thing. Do you really think this belongs under the heading of Philosophy?

Your you tube source is a funny kid who can't seem to keep his hat on straight, and may have a belief system influenced by a conversion to Islam. sigh... but consider that all mammals share common genes (all being a product of evolution). Also, sharing similar genes is not the same as having the same DNA. One other thing. Do you really think this belongs under the heading of Philosophy?
Are you seriously asking the question, does the meaning and source of life and questions thereof, belong under the heading of Philosophy? Bill Gates did not create computers, computer operating systems, or the internet, what he created was a language, that was intelligent enough to be spoken all over the world, by computers operated by very different people, this is what DNA is, a common language that links us together, and actually creates a library of language parts, that can be spliced together by intelligence, and was spliced together by intelligence to create the unimaginable. Билл Гейт не оздать Компьютеры, операционные итемы, или Интернет, что он оздал был зык, который был дотаточно умен, чтобы быть говорт во вем мире, помощью компьютеров, управлемых амыми разными людьми, то то, что ДК, общий зык, который взывает на вмете, и на амом деле оздает библиотеку зыковых чатей, которые могут быть оединены друг другом интеллекта, чтобы оздать невообразимое. Bill Gates non ha creato i computer, i sistemi operativi dei computer, o internet, ciò che ha creato era una lingua, che è stato abbastanza intelligente da essere parlato in tutto il mondo, dai computer gestiti da persone molto diverse, questo è ciò che il DNA è, un comune linguaggio che ci lega insieme, e in realtà crea una libreria di componenti linguistiche, che possono essere mescolati tra loro da intelligenza, per creare l'inimmaginabile. 比爾·蓋茨並沒有創造電腦,電腦"作系統,或互網,他創造了一種語言,這是明的,足以說出世界地,由常"的人"作電腦,這就是DNA是一種常見語言接我們在一起,居然創造了語言部分,以在一起情報拼接出庫,創建難以想"的。 If the parts do not work together they have far less meaning.
Do you really think this belongs under the heading of Philosophy?
Moved.
Ok this guy is kind of humorous, and correct. Although, I am not sure that he knows the maximum length of a sentence. How does Darwinian evolution explain that humans have more genes in common with the mouse, than with the great apes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1jPSN-cY-w Well if CNN says so, it's got to be true. http://edition.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/04/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome/
Both humans and the apes and mice are descended from rats.
Ok this guy is kind of humorous, and correct. Although, I am not sure that he knows the maximum length of a sentence. How does Darwinian evolution explain that humans have more genes in common with the mouse, than with the great apes? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1jPSN-cY-w Well if CNN says so, it's got to be true. http://edition.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/04/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome/
Both humans and the apes and mice are descended from rats. Could be true, as evolution certainly happens. But where are the hundreds to thousands of transitional species where rats turned into apes? Or do you believe that a rat gave birth to a primate one day? and even if this happened, what would the new primate mate with? Dude it makes no sense.
Could be true, as evolution certainly happens. But where are the hundreds to thousands of transitional species where rats turned into apes? Or do you believe that a rat gave birth to a primate one day? and even if this happened, what would the new primate mate with? Dude it makes no sense.
Could you give us your definition of evolution? You say it "happens", but have trouble with transitional fossils (even though you've been supplied 3 references). Everyone has their own unique view on these things, so we're all just dying to hear yours. Do new species pop into existence somehow, then evolve within their "kind"? Or what?
Could be true, as evolution certainly happens. But where are the hundreds to thousands of transitional species where rats turned into apes? Or do you believe that a rat gave birth to a primate one day? and even if this happened, what would the new primate mate with? Dude it makes no sense.
Could you give us your definition of evolution? You say it "happens", but have trouble with transitional fossils (even though you've been supplied 3 references). Everyone has their own unique view on these things, so we're all just dying to hear yours. Do new species pop into existence somehow, then evolve within their "kind"? Or what? Evolution is a Wolf being selectively bred into a German Shorthair, it is also why deer run from humans in my state, as the ones that do not are shot and do not reproduce. There are as many examples of evolution as there are species on the Earth. Evolution is not a rat becoming a gorilla, as there is no evidence that this happens, nor is the mechanism for this scientific. Even if a rat could give birth to a gorilla, what would the gorilla mate with to produce more gorillas, unless there were other rats that birthed gorillas at the same time. (kOOkOoa) Darwin had no clue on this and ignored the topic. What can evolution not produce? DNA that can store any type of computer data, making the DNA a hard drive, no matter how different it is from other hard drives of today. You can not explain how DNA can store this message, unless DNA is mechanical, and like all machines, created. https://wearabletechnologies.co.uk/2014/11/step-closer-cyborgs-hard-drives-flash-drives-dna-drives/ No the Gorilla is not the ducks biological mother, except in your mind http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3dRw_qT3wfM/TaiQ1UStteI/AAAAAAAACeo/ie2JIbEFcpE/s640/gorilla+n+duck.jpg

Evolution disproved in one sentence?
Reminds me of how god has been disproved in one sentence: “No logical evidence.”

Evolution disproved in one sentence? Reminds me of how god has been disproved in one sentence: "No logical evidence."
Unfortunately, Coral Star can't wrap his mind around that.

So where did rats come from? Or any other species?

Evolution disproved in one sentence? Reminds me of how god has been disproved in one sentence: "No logical evidence."
Unfortunately, Coral Star can't wrap his mind around that. He could be trolling. The level of argument so far presented is extremely childlike and ignorant, so much so it almost seems delibrate.
He could be trolling. The level of argument so far presented is extremely childlike and ignorant, so much so it almost seems delibrate.
Pretty sure you're voting in the majority. He almost had something, but presented with any kind of evidenced based question, he retreats to his standard lines about DNA is a hard drive, Darwin didn't know about DNA, there's no proof of Abiogenesis, etc. None of this fits together in any kind of coherent logic, but that doesn't seem to bother him.

How does Darwinian evolution explain that humans have more genes in common with the mouse, than with the great apes?
http://edition.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/04/coolsc.coolsc.mousegenome/

Where did you get the part about the Apes? There’s nothing in that article about it :-/

Fun stuff.

http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/25597.aspx Even though early human-like species were present at the same time as the ancestors of some present-day great apes, the researchers found that the evolutionary history of ancestral great ape populations was far more complex than that of humans. Compared to our closest relatives, chimpanzees, human history appears “almost boring," the researchers conclude. The last few million years of chimpanzee evolutionary history are fraught with population explosions followed by implosions demonstrating remarkable plasticity. The reasons for these fluctuations in chimpanzee population size long before our own population explosion are still unknown, however. http://news.wustl.edu/news/PublishingImages/Great Apes primary.jpg
Both humans and the apes and mice are descended from rats.
That was slip of the pen, right. :wow: {… er key strokes} Humans and apes and mice and rats are descended from rat-like creatures that lived millions and millions of years ago :)
Evolution disproved in one sentence? Reminds me of how god has been disproved in one sentence: "No logical evidence."
Unfortunately, Coral Star can't wrap his mind around that. :lol:
So where did rats come from? Or any other species?
The egg. :coolsmile:
Evolution disproved in one sentence? Reminds me of how god has been disproved in one sentence: "No logical evidence."
Unfortunately, Coral Star can't wrap his mind around that. He could be trolling. The level of argument so far presented is extremely childlike and ignorant, so much so it almost seems delibrate. There is no level of argument here, just a commonality of foolish ideas.
Both humans and the apes and mice are descended from rats.
That was slip of the pen, right. :wow: {… er key strokes} Humans and apes and mice and rats are descended from rat-like creatures that lived millions and millions of years ago :)
Evolution disproved in one sentence? Reminds me of how god has been disproved in one sentence: "No logical evidence."
Unfortunately, Coral Star can't wrap his mind around that. :lol:
So where did rats come from? Or any other species?
The egg. :coolsmile: The human egg takes 6 billion base pairs to form......... This could happen by chance in a warm pond, given there was a bored geneticist named God taking a bath in the pond at the time......... http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/134/cache/cheetah-mother-cub_13420_990x742.jpg
...This could happen by chance in a warm pond, given there was a bored geneticist named God taking a bath in the pond at the time.........
So your "theory" is that there exists a God, who got bored, created DNA, and left it on Earth, possibly while bathing?
There is no level of argument here, just a commonality of foolish ideas.
At least you're now being honest about your position.
...This could happen by chance in a warm pond, given there was a bored geneticist named God taking a bath in the pond at the time.........
So your "theory" is that there exists a God, who got bored, created DNA, and left it on Earth, possibly while bathing? And your theory is that the pond got bored and then the pond began creating hard drives that contain chemical code. It always comes back to this point, the question then becomes, what is more logical. If you recognize that DNA is a functioning computer system along with storage hardware and code, not to mention that the code assembles a small part of what will be a larger computer, then intelligence, that functions exactly like human intelligence, though far more advanced is obvious. However if you ignore all of these ideas because you begin with a pre conceived and irrational notion, that you are the greatest and most advanced being in the universe, and that there can be no creator of life on Earth, because life evolves, then the hard drive and code that it contains, clearly spontaneously generated from the pond. When you run the line of time forward, and simply speculate that humanity will soon be doing experiments in having life take hold on planets and moons in our own solar system, then what is an intelligent designer becomes far clearer, and as quoted somewhere, the image of man, is created in the image of God. This is not a biblical argument, it is a scientific one, as the bible never once mentioned hard drives. Time will add DNA, as DNA is a storage media from our future, that was left here in our past. If you consider the last line carefully, you will see that it is logical, no matter how implausible that it seems. As when the Earth was born of dust, the rest of the Universe was 8 billion years old. Bill Gates quote, “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." http://standupforamerica.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/spock-logic-begninning.jpg?w=320&h=256