Trump may have finally given his opponents the opening they need, to bring him down, as he has flat out inferred that Megan Kelly’s “attack” on him was motivated in part by her being on her period. There are plenty of “politically incorrect” things that the Donald can say and get away with. But there are some “socially taboo” things that no one can say and get away with. e.g., If FOX News had a black reporter that confronted Trump, Trump could not, for instance get away with inferring that the reporter was just being a “nigger”. Similarly, I do not think anyone can get away with the inference that a female reporter who is being confrontational is doing so because she is “on her period”.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the chair of the Democratic National Committee is the woman.
And “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?" is the question asked on August 4. Unable to answer.
Trump may have finally given his opponents the opening they need, to bring him down, as he has flat out inferred that Megan Kelly's "attack" on him was motivated in part by her being on her period. There are plenty of "politically incorrect" things that the Donald can say and get away with. But there are some "socially taboo" things that no one can say and get away with. e.g., If FOX News had a black reporter that confronted Trump, Trump could not, for instance get away with inferring that the reporter was just being a "nigger". Similarly, I do not think anyone can get away with the inference that a female reporter who is being confrontational is doing so because she is "on her period".You got that right. Rosie O’Donnell - yes Megyn Kelly or any other news reporter - no, no, no and hell no.
Or, If it is not handled right could crush the economy. A date has to be set, and strong actions have to be taken immediately. The wrong action can cause more damage and leave us with no resource to fix anything. The date is controlled by the scientist and the computer models. Once they are working and the models all agree, then the steps to be taken will be clear and straight forward. In the meantime we need to get the economy back in shape and get ready.If we want to help the climate problems, police the world and help other countries we better have a good and healthy economy.And one of the ways we can have a good and healthy economy is by tackling climate problems.
You know, I don’t think Trump would not be standing in a mess right now if he had spent some time on this web site talking to people like Tucker and Tim.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the chair of the Democratic National Committee is the woman. And “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?" is the question asked on August 4. Unable to answer.One difference is simply the pejorative association of the word "socialist" with the demonized word "communist". In actuality, ALL Americans are to one degree or another, "socialists", including ALL Repubs.
Trump may have finally given his opponents the opening they need, to bring him down, as he has flat out inferred that Megan Kelly's "attack" on him was motivated in part by her being on her period. There are plenty of "politically incorrect" things that the Donald can say and get away with. But there are some "socially taboo" things that no one can say and get away with. e.g., If FOX News had a black reporter that confronted Trump, Trump could not, for instance get away with inferring that the reporter was just being a "nigger". Similarly, I do not think anyone can get away with the inference that a female reporter who is being confrontational is doing so because she is "on her period".You got that right. Rosie O’Donnell - yes Megyn Kelly or any other news reporter - no, no, no and hell no. Damn Repubs are stealing some of our feisty, good looking women... You know what, let them have her... I couldn't keep it up, anyway for a woman so ideologically distorted (unless we were playing out some kinky domination/submission fantasy).
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers?
Trump may have finally given his opponents the opening they need, to bring him down, as he has flat out inferred that Megan Kelly's "attack" on him was motivated in part by her being on her period. There are plenty of "politically incorrect" things that the Donald can say and get away with. But there are some "socially taboo" things that no one can say and get away with. e.g., If FOX News had a black reporter that confronted Trump, Trump could not, for instance get away with inferring that the reporter was just being a "nigger". Similarly, I do not think anyone can get away with the inference that a female reporter who is being confrontational is doing so because she is "on her period".You got that right. Rosie O’Donnell - yes Megyn Kelly or any other news reporter - no, no, no and hell no. Damn Repubs are stealing some of our feisty, good looking women... You know what, let them have her... I couldn't keep it up, anyway for a woman so ideologically distorted (unless we were playing out some kinky domination/submission fantasy). No two ways to put this, Megyn Kelly is hot!
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers? In theory... maybe?... but Trump also comes with a petty and vindictive personality. Trump for President? In the words of faux George H.W. Bush, "Nah... Not gonna do it... wouldn't be prudent."
Tucker, Couldn’t find the site, but this one I think is talking about the same thing. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/250367-election-model-predicts-nail-biter-in-2016Moody's, ah yes, one of the companies which is responsible for the banking scandals. In 2012, they predicted that Obama would get 303 electoral votes: http://www.washingtonpost.com/pb/news/wonkblog/wp/2012/11/05/pundit-accountability-the-official-2012-election-prediction-thread/?resType=accessibility He got 332: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012 Projections this far out are worthless anyway, because a lot could happen between now and then. Tucker, please don’t bring up the banking scandals, it gets my blood boiling! Makes me think things like, Iran, wants to nuke DC, right on!
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers? In theory... maybe?... but Trump also comes with a petty and vindictive personality. Trump for President? In the words of faux George H.W. Bush, "Nah... Not gonna do it... wouldn't be prudent." Don’t worry about that. If Trump was president, he is going to do what has worked for him in the past. And that is hire the best qualified people that know-how and will get the job done. And Trump will listen to these people. He did not get to where he is at by using his own knowledge. And as you can see when he is left on his own, does not do well. Get past the political rainfall and concentrate on the upcoming tasks of the new president.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the chair of the Democratic National Committee is the woman. And “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?" is the question asked on August 4. Unable to answer.One difference is simply the pejorative association of the word "socialist" with the demonized word "communist". In actuality, ALL Americans are to one degree or another, "socialists", including ALL Repubs. I heard there is a new book out about the life of Harry Dexter White. It is the next book I want to read. One of the great American hero’s in my thinking. I still think the US government murder Harry. If Harry had lived this whole cold war communist, socialist event would have never have happen the way it did here in America.
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers? Oh, puleeze! We don't need a fox guarding the chicken coop. Lois
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers? In theory... maybe?... but Trump also comes with a petty and vindictive personality. Trump for President? In the words of faux George H.W. Bush, "Nah... Not gonna do it... wouldn't be prudent." Don’t worry about that. If Trump was president, he is going to do what has worked for him in the past. And that is hire the best qualified people that know-how and will get the job done. And Trump will listen to these people. He did not get to where he is at by using his own knowledge. And as you can see when he is left on his own, does not do well. Get past the political rainfall and concentrate on the upcoming tasks of the new president. Yes, he'll get the best people to build an unworkable fence. And goddess knows what else he'd get the "best people" to get a job done. Hitler and Mussolini did that and it "worked" for quite a few years. Lois
Trump may have finally given his opponents the opening they need, to bring him down, as he has flat out inferred that Megan Kelly's "attack" on him was motivated in part by her being on her period. There are plenty of "politically incorrect" things that the Donald can say and get away with. But there are some "socially taboo" things that no one can say and get away with. e.g., If FOX News had a black reporter that confronted Trump, Trump could not, for instance get away with inferring that the reporter was just being a "nigger". Similarly, I do not think anyone can get away with the inference that a female reporter who is being confrontational is doing so because she is "on her period".Sadly, I think that many people share his view. Ann Coulter, for example, has said that women never should have been given the right to vote.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the chair of the Democratic National Committee is the woman. And “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?" is the question asked on August 4. Unable to answer.Unwilling to answer, I think, because she doesn't want to alienate those people who're wanting Bernie Sanders to win the nomination. If Hillary gets the nomination, Ms. Wasserman-Schultz is going to need every one of those folks who're currently pulling for Sanders to vote for Hillary.
If we want to help the climate problems, police the world and help other countries we better have a good and healthy economy.And one of the ways we can have a good and healthy economy is by tackling climate problems.
Or, If it is not handled right could crush the economy.That's highly unlikely, since investing heavily in alternative energy sources is only going to stimulate the economy.
A date has to be set, and strong actions have to be taken immediately.And which party do you think it is which is blocking efforts to do anything about global warming? I'll give you a hint, one of their members stood on the floor of Congress and said global warming was a myth because it was snowing outside.
The wrong action can cause more damage and leave us with no resource to fix anything.The wrong action would be doing nothing, which is basically what we're doing now.
The date is controlled by the scientist and the computer models. Once they are working and the models all agree, then the steps to be taken will be clear and straight forward. In the meantime we need to get the economy back in shape and get ready.99% of climate scientists already agree, and the only thing in dispute is just how bad things will get if we continue to do nothing.
You know, I don’t think Trump would not be standing in a mess right now if he had spent some time on this web site talking to people like Tucker and Tim.According to people who know Trump, like Penn Jillette, the only person Trump listens to, is Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers?If you think that Trump is looking out for anyone other than himself, you're sadly mistaken.
Tucker, Couldn’t find the site, but this one I think is talking about the same thing. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/250367-election-model-predicts-nail-biter-in-2016Moody's, ah yes, one of the companies which is responsible for the banking scandals. In 2012, they predicted that Obama would get 303 electoral votes: http://www.washingtonpost.com/pb/news/wonkblog/wp/2012/11/05/pundit-accountability-the-official-2012-election-prediction-thread/?resType=accessibility He got 332: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012 Projections this far out are worthless anyway, because a lot could happen between now and then. Tucker, please don’t bring up the banking scandals, it gets my blood boiling! Makes me think things like, Iran, wants to nuke DC, right on!Nuking DC wouldn't solve anything when it comes to the banking crisis, since at least half the people responsible for it would be in places like Wall St., City of London, and Frankfurt.
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers? Oh, puleeze! We don't need a fox guarding the chicken coop. Lois Lois, I had the task of approving every new client the marketing department wanted to bring on board. So I thought I would help out the marketing department by making them a list of what qualities to look for in an idea client company. I made a list of what I considered was our top clients, they were the best run companies with the smartest owners and managers. Within a year the top two clients on the list both went bankrupt. Owing us hundreds of thousands of dollars. The owners of these companies lived in very expensive homes and did not have to file bankruptcy. I ask them why they were hurting us in this manner. And they both said the same thing. They following the advice of their accounts and that’s the way business is done today. This was some years back. Point being, Trump got to where is today by following the advice of people like accountants. Is it wrong, I could not have done that to another company. But it was part of the system for success at one time.
Donald Trump is for whatever he thinks will bring the most attention to himself. According to people I know who've worked for Trump, his manner of running his businesses (and let's not forget that Trump's filed for bankruptcy at least 4 times) is that the other people assume most of the risk, while he gets most of the profits. If the venture fails, it costs him little to nothing, while everyone else is out a considerable sum of money.That is the system. Used by everyone except our government. The tax payer are always getting stuck with the bill. Wouldn’t it be nice to have someone like Trump who knows the system and is watching out for us tax payers? In theory... maybe?... but Trump also comes with a petty and vindictive personality. Trump for President? In the words of faux George H.W. Bush, "Nah... Not gonna do it... wouldn't be prudent." Don’t worry about that. If Trump was president, he is going to do what has worked for him in the past. And that is hire the best qualified people that know-how and will get the job done. And Trump will listen to these people. He did not get to where he is at by using his own knowledge. And as you can see when he is left on his own, does not do well. Get past the political rainfall and concentrate on the upcoming tasks of the new president. Great, then we would have a Pres who stays up til 4 a.m., tweeting insults about the last person who said something about him that he found offensive. I think that being an effective and successful POTUS is enormously more complex than, (and requires skills beyond) self-promotion and coming out on top in most business deals. And I think that it requires a flexibility of demeanor that Trump has not shown. The chances of his "making America great, again" (per his slogan) may be equal to his chances of making America a pile of rubble. Honestly, I am not worried about Trump becoming Pres., unless I have somehow slid into a Bizarro Alternate universe. Fox News and the RNC will not allow him to be the Repub nominee. If necessary, they will take him out by hook or by crook. But it probably won't be necessary. He won't win the Iowa Caucus because he doesn't have the political organization and doesn't seem to be able to hire and keep people who could do it for him. But if you are correct he should be able to hire the best people to get the job done for him in Iowa, right? or New Hampshire? or So. Carolina? If not, how is he going to be able to hire the right people to organize and win a third party candidacy?
Great, then we would have a Pres who stays up til 4 a.m., tweeting insults about the last person who said something about him that he found offensive. I think that being an effective and successful POTUS is enormously more complex than, (and requires skills beyond) self-promotion and coming out on top in most business deals. And I think that it requires a flexibility of demeanor that Trump has not shown. The chances of his "making America great, again" (per his slogan) may be equal to his chances of making America a pile of rubble. Honestly, I am not worried about Trump becoming Pres., unless I have somehow slid into a Bizarro Alternate universe. Fox News and the RNC will not allow him to be the Repub nominee. If necessary, they will take him out by hook or by crook. But it probably won't be necessary. He won't win the Iowa Caucus because he doesn't have the political organization and doesn't seem to be able to hire and keep people who could do it for him. But if you are correct he should be able to hire the best people to get the job done for him in Iowa, right? or New Hampshire? or So. Carolina? If not, how is he going to be able to hire the right people to organize and win a third party candidacy?Never have the time to watch TV. But I looked it up. Trump got paid $213 million from NBC for a TV show called the Apprentice that ran for 14 seasons. Isn’t that all about hiring and firing. Isn’t Trump supposed to be one of the best in that area?
Great, then we would have a Pres who stays up til 4 a.m., tweeting insults about the last person who said something about him that he found offensive. I think that being an effective and successful POTUS is enormously more complex than, (and requires skills beyond) self-promotion and coming out on top in most business deals. And I think that it requires a flexibility of demeanor that Trump has not shown. The chances of his "making America great, again" (per his slogan) may be equal to his chances of making America a pile of rubble. Honestly, I am not worried about Trump becoming Pres., unless I have somehow slid into a Bizarro Alternate universe. Fox News and the RNC will not allow him to be the Repub nominee. If necessary, they will take him out by hook or by crook. But it probably won't be necessary. He won't win the Iowa Caucus because he doesn't have the political organization and doesn't seem to be able to hire and keep people who could do it for him. But if you are correct he should be able to hire the best people to get the job done for him in Iowa, right? or New Hampshire? or So. Carolina? If not, how is he going to be able to hire the right people to organize and win a third party candidacy?Never have the time to watch TV. But I looked it up. Trump got paid $213 million from NBC for a TV show called the Apprentice that ran for 14 seasons. Isn’t that all about hiring and firing. Isn’t Trump supposed to be one of the best in that area?No and no. It was a contrived show where ordinary people (for a couple of seasons, then they were dumped and replaced with a rotating cast of celebrities) were given assignments on creating businesses in an unrealistic manner. The winner was determined not by how well you performed, but if Trump liked you. So you could make significantly more money than anyone else, but lose because you happened to rub Trump the wrong way. A frequent "contestant" on the "Celebrity Apprentice" version was Penn Jillette, who had been rather outspoken of his criticism of Trump (even though he likes him as a person), until fairly recently. Jillette announced on his podcast a few weeks ago that he was no longer going to be saying anything negative about Trump because he was worried that Trump would attempt to retaliate by harming the careers of Jillette's friends! Does that sound like someone you want with their finger on the goddamned nuclear button??? Putting Trump in the White House would be like handing a toddler a fully loaded minigun.] Not a good idea by any stretch of the imagination.