god you are vulgar. You fit in well with the house of trump meanwhile its the christian zealots that are trying to and are getting into power and turn america into a theocracy.
WriteU the trumpist
god you are vulgar. You fit in well with the house of trump meanwhile its the christian zealots that are trying to and are getting into power and turn america into a theocracy.
WriteU the trumpist
I donāt see write4u as vulgar nor do I see write4u as fitting in with the dotard. The dotard is stomach turning in how he treats people. Write4u is nowhere near that.
Thatās what the religious reich in the U.S. want.
I would consider this a reasonable proof for discussion although I appreciate that you are only taking my work that I did not invent this story: A devout muslim friend once told me that a muslim is not allowed to report another muslim to the police for any wrong-doing in effect - which is a scary thought as its open to abuse by people by extremists and those that do everything that muslims do and fake it as a muslim so can get away with whatever they want. So if you suspected someone planning something like making a bomb then you are not allowed to report it!!The reason for the loyalty was something to do with being a fellow-brother - of course I was shocked and saddened when I found this out. I was a devout Christian myself and donāt recall anything like that in the Bible or at church groups. I might have to ask another muslim if its really a true interpretation of what they should believe,
Even reporting crime offenders of the same faith is not clear as in a post and reply on an Islamic forum - its reads like its discouraged to avoid muslims being judged by non-Sharia laws :
"As for reporting him (a muslim), that comes under the heading of combatting evil and corruption. "
So you donāt want fundamentalist terrorists as your neighbors? Nor do I.
Make sure you understand the meaning of terms before you shoot off your mouth like a fundamentalist theocrat.
And to the system! There is nothing inappropriate with my post.
Please review the content critically and restore it for public viewing.
Moderation note:
This thread is getting too heated. Iām not going to try to sort it out. Itās an exercise in how to be intolerant of the intolerable. Can we do that without it being a contest of who is the worst terrorist?
Governments will keep building walls and killing their neighbors. This is a place to discuss that, not call each other names.
I donāt like to be called vulgar and Trumpist by some punk who comes in here and attacks me with knee jerk ad hominem, without reading or understanding what I posted to begin with.
And in a country like Afghanistan, the few crazies managed to get power. There are a lot of good people living there trying to deal with it. We shouldnāt build a wall around them and treat them all with suspicion. Does that make sense?
Jforgenius1000 is a sock puppet of a previously banned member. The account has been deactivated.
Me included - its so easy to bait / accidentally bait a post so it then becomes a heated argument. Just lately Iāve gone back to edit my posts and even add some evidence such as adding a website link to support what I wrote - shouldnāt have to make the extra effort but necessary for sure which I learnāt today when I read the FAQ for this forum.
What you wrote is true , but it is not responsive to anything I said.
Read my post and you will see that at no time did I use inappropriate language or prejudicial generalities.
So much for my remark of freedom of speech in the US. I was just proven wrong.