Kamala did not “kill” anything at the debate. Effective polarization is an idea, as described in V for Vendetta, you can’t kill it. She did better than Hillary or any of the Biden debates, but it’s still a tight race. Here are a few of my unpopular notes:
The immigrants eating cats thing is an attempt to win Ohio. I knew Hillary was done when Trump took Ohio in 2016. He may have lost more votes than he gained this time, hard to tell. It’s also just a general tactic of saying something is true and there is evidence and “they” are covering it up and he listens to “the people” which is where some “real truth” lies.
Also, every time he says something is the “most ever” or “biggest ever”, same thing, it’s just how he talks. He wants you to waste your time fact-checking him, because he didn’t intend it to be factual.
I was surprised at how many statistics he cited, names he remembered, historical events and timelines he got right. He was aware of who the audience was last night so he didn’t ramble as much as he does at his rallies. Kamala made a bad move by mentioning things like people leaving rallies because they are bored, that’s hard to fact-check. It opened the door for Trump to make false claims about her rally attendance.
I would like to see a time analysis of interruptions, demanding extra time from moderators, going over the clock, or whatever else they might be able to track. Kamala would most likely win the numbers, but even one interruption she made is something those who are against her or on the fence will remember.
On the faces they made, Trump scowled like he often does and Kamala laughed, both of them in character. Either of them could have made adjustments and possibly appealed to the undecided.
This story is poorly hidden racism. I know white people who drive bad, hit buses, kill children, poach all sorts of animals and eat them, don’t work, get welfare, and move to Ohio. It’s not a problem caused by Haitians.
What does or is “Unpopular Opinion #87” mean or about?
When you got nothing on the moral side, default to racism. That’s sad. You told me once that immigration was not a problem because it was such a small percentage of the population. These types of problems don’t just happen overnight. They generally are building up over decades. Not the case here. Nighttime planes loaded with people being flown in to colonize our country. Don’t like racism, then the logical thing to do would be not to support the Democratic Party and their goals.
The support of immigration is also supporting the rapid expansion of religion in America. Religion was in decline in America until the immigration policies of the Democratic Party took control. Now religion in America has flipped from decreasing to increasing. Is CFI’s goal now, progressivism for religion?
And a paper in le Monde, one of the main French newspapers, adds that, not only the 15 000 Haitians living in Springfield are not illegal immigrants, but that they were welcomed to revitalize the town.
Then there’s blatant racism. They pay for a seat on a commercial flight and get work. Increasing population is part of economic growth. People have been coming here since 1492, it’s who we are.
Let’s be real here. Airfare. Work. Numbers are hard to come by. The trends are that immigrant’s worker participation is 66.6% whereas American born is 61.8%. The highest level of labor participation was 67.3% for Americans. Covid saw a drop to 62.7%. It should be going back up. But it is not. It is following the trends of recession. Aging population and other forms of income such as court awards and medical awards play a part in low participation rates. If you can’t get ahead by working, then why work? Remember debt bondage is the most common form of modern slavery. Immigration is forcing Americans into debt bondage.
That is true for banks and stock market. But it is not true for the common America family. More debt. Lower standard of living. That is what we are seeing. The age of new motherhood is at all-time record high partly due to financial stability. That’s not a good sign of a good economy.
Do you use that hypothesis for guns and slavery?
Nothing hard about this to debate. Using history and common factors. The top common factors of a civilization are.
High protein
Happiness/entertainment
Rules of Laws
High knowledge level
Capitalist system
Control of greed
Minimal caste
Good monetary system
Belief in certain deity
Medical services
Today’s problems are the cost of food, poor enforcement of crimes, unionized education, political greed, growing political caste system, a degrading monetary system and a degrading capitalist system.
How does 32 million immigrants help any of these issues? Ask yourself, what is the cost of free legal services for 32 million people. A couple months ago I was in a community building that used to be a high school in the Los Angeles area. Most of the old classrooms were now occupied by attorneys offering free legal services. 1492 did not come to mind.
WTF? Of course there is unemployment, what good are those numbers? And what’s “Welcome Core”. Are we still talking about Haitians in Ohio?
Your logic is un-followable.
Or because women can choose to get pregnant or not. Show me the data on how more people means a lower standard of living.
Why would I ask that when it’s not needed?
To whom? Did you check everyone’s status there? What was it, tax time? It helps when you reveal how your brain takes some random event and turns it into a nightmare scenario. You should try some mindfulness meditation and observe yourself.