H. pylori has no connection with motion sickness. What I mean is that the vested interests used the same method to suppress the scientific discoveries related to both H. pylori and motion sickness.（Further, Dr. Marshall said, “The fact that the big drug companies who were supporting the journal articles ignored H. pylori was far more effective than actually saying that a bacterial cause was not true because if they had said it was false, or not important, they would have created a controversy and maybe media interest.”）
More than a decade ago, Chinese scientists researching motion sickness accused me, claiming that my online posts stating “motion sickness is caused by low-frequency noise” had damaged the reputation of Chinese scientists and constituted defamation against them. However, fearing it would attract media attention, they have not yet filed a lawsuit against me for defamation in court.
Ok, I gave you a couple of tries but, illogical. You are taking a general truth, that all science should be checked and questioned and challenged, and turned that into a specific falsehood, that your specific science is true because not all scientists accept all challenges.
There aren’t vested interests here, there is a consensus, and it was expanded to include sounds as a cause.
How do you suggest that their stories match. I don’t see it.
Plus considering the extensive experience I had as a kid, sitting in the back seat, with two sisters who were prone to motion sickness. Only once, where they stuck fighting for that coffee can at the same time. Yes indeed hilarity ensued. So that further supports my notion that low-frequency noise had nothing to do with their periodic attacks of Motion Sickness.
Not that I don’t imagine it’s possible for an extreme case to trigger upset and vomiting - but that would be unrelated to motion sickness per se - wouldn’t it?
Some different sort of neutral overload.