Las Vegas massacre had an unknown motive but the victims were at a country music concert and that is a conservative fan base. So unlikely motivated by right wing sentiment.
Sorry, that was the 2014 Las Vegas shooting I was talking about, not the more recent one.
Pulse nightclub shooting was Islamic terrorism.
You got me on that one.
Charlottesville was only terrorism if you think certain groups should not have the right to assemble. The driver of the vehicle that ran over the girl was not part of the rally.
Incorrect. Fields drove from Ohio to attend the rally. He had undeniable neo-Naxi and white supremacist beliefs and kept a photo of Hitler by his bedside. The actu was deliberate and motivated by his political beliefs. It's on a list of right-wing terrorist attacks on Wikipedia.
But, um, had this to say:
Only a few of these can be called right wing terrorism.
I listed 14 things, nine of which were either right-wing terrorist attacks or groups of right-wing terrorist attacks. You took exception with 3. Of those 3, you were wrong on 1 and another was ambiguous, so you took it as the wrong attack. But let's say you were right on all 3. Out of a list of 9 attacks, several of which were groups of multiple attacks, but we'll take them as one, would you say the word "few" more accurately describes the number "3" or the number "6"? When the number is actually 8 out of 9, would you say that the word "few" accurately describes 8/9ths of the whole?
And then there’s this:
...they are busy taking care of imaginary right wing terrorism
EVEN IF you count it as only 6 out of 14 (because I know you would like to even though the other 5 were clearly labeled as reports and never claimed to be "instances" of right-wing terrorism, but I'll give it to you here), if something is 3/7 real it is hardly "imaginary", is it?
At least this response was based loosely in a fact-based reality. I miss the conservatives of old. Yeah, they always lied through their teeth. They would always feed you some bullshit line that you knew was bullshit and then act all indignant when you called it as bullshit. But at least they respected facts. They didn’t throw away every report from every intelligence agency we have to instead believe Russia did nothing to help Trump, AND THEN add to that a dumbass conspiracy theory that Russia ACTUALLY helped Hillary! They didn’t throw out multiple reports from multiple agencies, including the DHS, to simply accept Bill Barr’s version of things. And let’s face some actual reality here, you all know Barr is a dishonest weasel of a Trump lackey. You know this as well as I do. You know that he tried to drop the case against Flynn, not because Flynn did nothing wrong, but because Flynn is a Trump ally. It’s a federal-level “ticket fixing” scandal. When you lie to the FBI in the course of an active investigation IT DOES NOT MATTER if what they are investigating leads to actual, legitimate charges being field, it’s a crime either way! We all know that. But one side pretends that they don’t know that. And I am getting really sick of smart people acting stupid so they can drag me down the damned rabbit hole with them into their deranged fantasy land where they’re right all the time and I can be right too, if I just agree with them on everything. Yeah, they always though it was “fair” that their guy would lose an election and become president anyway and also “fair” that they do everything in their power to remove the rightfully elected president when their guy lost. And they pretended that the Benghazi investigation was totally not a political abuse of power, it just happened to end the month after Hillary’s presidential bid was over, by sheer coincidence. But at least conservatives used to accept some things as actual facts.