Media silent on dismissal of DNC suit against Julian Assange

A federal court ruling last Tuesday dismissing a Democratic National Committee (DNC) civil suit against Julian Assange “with prejudice” was a devastating indictment of the US ruling elite’s campaign to destroy the WikiLeaks founder. It exposed as a fraud the entire “Russiagate” conspiracy theory peddled by the Democratic Party, the corporate media and the intelligence agencies for the past three years.

The decision, by Judge John Koeltl of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, rejected the smears that Assange “colluded” with Russia. It upheld his status as a journalist and publisher and dismissed claims that WikiLeaks’ 2016 publication of leaked emails from the DNC was “illegal.”

Despite the significance of the ruling, and its clear newsworthiness, it has been subjected to an almost complete blackout by the entire media in the US and internationally.

World Socialist Web Site

Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International

International what? Who knows?

Though it might explain the tone of the article. Trustworthiness smell: sorta stinky


I wonder why you didn’t credit that as the cut and paste quote it is -

Wall Street Journal – Judge Dismisses Democrats’ Suit Against Russia, Trump Campaign

DNC lawsuit alleged a conspiracy to hack into computer network and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

The DNC going after Assange was claiming that Trump was working with Assange. Just DNC BS being dumped on the people. Only believed by the Left and hard-core Democrats. The World Socialist web site did not bring up that point. The story was covered by several news outlets but Trump overshadowed Assange and it was all about Trump and Russia.

What you have is the World Socialist wants to make it about Assange and not Trump and you don’t have a lot of media outlets following that line of thinking.

“Only believed by the Left”

What left??

It is no big surprise that a US court made a ruling that is consistent with freedom of the press. Even a press such as Wikileaks that was controlled by the Russian ass-kissing, Hillary hating, manipulating Assange. If he were able to be successfully sued, then most of the people at Fox News would be similarly civilly liable.

Timb the anti Russian propaganda has fried your brain

I, otoh, think that the Pro-Russian propaganda has eaten holes in your brain. Seriously dude, who is most effective at propaganda? Answer: the Russians

Clearly they have gotten to you, and you are no run-of-the-mill dummy.

No way it is Russia. The USA are the professionals overall. But we probably spent twenty times more to get done what the Russians can do. The propaganda reward goes to Germany. Germany took over the EU in what they could not do in two World Wars. And they got a lock for the next twenty years in making the EU the way they want it. And they got it setup that they get paid by all the countries they are controlling to do this. How brilliant is that? And it the way they did it took awhile to get in place but it is so simple. I don’t want to get this post to far off track. So I will stop here.

The USA screwed up when they turned the propaganda system in favor of one political party. Maybe it was not the first time. But let’s see how strong the caste system is here in America. Another point is, if we are going to be progressive, people got to understand what the caste is. You can’t fix what is broken if you don’t know it is broken.

Tim b read chomskys propaganda model to see how it is done in the west.

I have no respect for Noam Chomsky. He turned to political opinion (where it’s difficult to be successfully outed as a hack) when he was a perpetually wrong, unproductive hack in his original field of linguistics. He was the worst kind of hack, the kind who is so good at self-promotion that they are considered to be premier in their field, when they are really just a hack.

Our news is filtered 5 ways before it reaches us. You seem to disagee with this

Might I disagree with an assertion that you just pulled out of your butt? Yes, I might.

That the corporate media and the corporations that sponsor them dont try and control the narrative is NEWS to you??

You are a thinker. No doubt about it

Go on, tell us the 5 ways that u claim our news is filtered before it reaches us.

ownership, advertising, sourcing, flax, fear.



An old dude spouting gobbledygook, that is considered “wise” because he has a “reputation” for knowing stuff. Me thinks the emperor Chomsky wears no clothes.

But maybe he does know something about propaganda. That could explain how he fooled so many into the perception that he is “wise” and “knows stuff”.

You cant lay a glove on any of the points he makes

Me Noam. Me put big words together. Pretend me know something. Goofyheads think me expert.


Really? " ownership, advertising, sourcing, flax, fear" are the 5 ways news is filtered for the masses? Nonsense masquerading as knowledge.

you know it all poindexter