It seems to be a powerful argument that the photographs and video show evidence of more than one light source. The different directions in which shadows fall give this credance. Indeed that which is in shadow is still clearly visible, as though a weak secondary light source is responsible for this. NASA state that no lighting equipment was taken there.
Presumably the light from the sun is being reflected back by the silver exterior of the LEM. Possibly NASA had reason to lie about there being no lighting equipment outside the LEM.
Can anyone else do any more debunking of the debunkers on this topic?
It seems to be a powerful argument that the photographs and video show evidence of more than one light source. The different directions in which shadows fall give this credance. Indeed that which is in shadow is still clearly visible, as though a weak secondary light source is responsible for this. NASA state that no lighting equipment was taken there. Presumably the light from the sun is being reflected back by the silver exterior of the LEM. Possibly NASA had reason to lie about there being no lighting equipment outside the LEM. Can anyone else do any more debunking of the debunkers on this topic?Nobody who has not been on the moon knows how light behaves there. It is probably completely different than on earth. The conspiracy theorists are assuming it's exactly as it is on earth, so any difference is seen as evidence of fraud. Typical among conspiracy theorists. They usually can't think their way out of a paper bag. Lois