I am of two minds.
Yes i asked Egghead his list of rights and he cannot be criticized for answering. He is entitled to fairness as everyone here.
“Secular humanists promote values including integrity, benevolence, fairness, and responsibility”
I agree with this statement, and i agree with Egghead list.
But this list is irrelevant to determine if China is a democracy.
Democracy (from Ancient Greek: δημοκρατία, romanized: dēmokratía, dēmos ‘people’ and kratos ‘rule’) is a system of government in which state power is vested in the people or the general population of a state. Under a minimalist definition of democracy, rulers are elected through competitive elections while more expansive definitions link democracy to guarantees of civil liberties and human rights in addition to competitive elections.
I would add that free elections and human rights implies freedom of thought, freedom of speech and free independent Medias.
To change the definition of a word to suit your needs is a typical totalitarian process.
Once more, Egghead has not answered to my demonstration about China. Tacitly, he admits I am right and changes the topic
It is not an attack, it is a fact.
Anyway, USA and CFI are not perfect, but China cannot be used as a standard or a reference of democracy.
Now, it is sure that USA fail to satisfy the basic needs of each of its citizen such as rightly listed by Egg head!
Can CFI criticized for that ? No !
I am not sure that it enters in his fields of action.
Even if it does, can it be criticized for not fighting enough on them ? CFI is not perfect. And with limited means, it cannot permanently fight on every field.