Anti-parasite medication

Alternative Medicine
42

[quote=“triplex69, post:41, topic:7762”]
Everything you write here is littered with strawman arguments. You have an agenda
[/quote] Ok. I’ll give you an opportunity to present my agenda for the world to see.

And what agenda might that be? I’ll be entitled to ask for proof as I did with your claim that Ivermectin is an effective antiviral medicine and you could not provide proof of any relevance, except for some strawman evidence of Nobel awards for an completely unrelated matter. So if you want to keep embarrassing yourself, be my guest.

I don’t need an agenda. You are doing a mighty good job of destroying your own agenda…

43

Another strawman. You don’t know when to stop

44

No the original claim was Ivermection is being considered as a treatment for Covid.

All other discussion is based on this inherently false proposition.

If you did not considerthat Ivermectin is of use as an antiviral then why are you arguing against my position. I never declared that Ivermectin is not used by humans for parasitic infections. (see post #6, Dec 11) . I declared that Ivermectin is useless against Covid, because it is in no way related to viral infections. Why are you arguing with me?

45

Not from me but you keep arguing!!!

46

Blah, blah, blah it’s not an antiviral. Please stop with the propaganda.

47

Never said it was antiviral. Stop putting words in people’s mouths. Stop that

48

Please, it seems to me that we agree that Ivermectin is a drug approved for human to fight against parasitic infection, and not for use to fight viruses.

Then, may be we can stop the name calling. and be more constructive.

It has been observed that some treatments used for some illness have proved effective against other ones. Ivermectin is being tested for COVID, let’s wait for the decisions of medical authorities.

2 Likes
49

This is troll behavior. taking one phrase, one slightly misplaced word or two, out of context, then calling it a “claim” and distracting from the discussion with a simple statement of “that is wrong”, and then, especially “and then”, calling something a logical fallacy when you could have stated it as a clarification. Misunderstandings are normal, correct them, instead of making them into arguments.

50

Continuously arguing about something a person did not say is huge troll behaviour. Get onto it

51

I really don’t like explaining the obvious, but you’re new. You responded to this post

That is medication for horses and cows, not humans. Humans who take it are dying. T

by saying “you are wrong”.

There are at least three facts in the post, so when you responded, there’s no telling which one you were responding to, or was it all? How could we know?

Well, some assumptions were made. That happens. Grownups do their best, but we aren’t all in tune with what’s in your head triplex. So, you clarified, but in the most confrontational way you could think of. And you kept it up. I can only determine, from all evidence I see within just this thread, that being confrontational is your preferred state.

52

Seems to me people round these woods can’t just admit a mistake and move on. Just want to double down and argue by deflecting on something that was not said.

53
54

And not your opinion brother!

55

The donkey told the tiger, “The grass is blue.”

The tiger replied, “No, the grass is green.”

The discussion became heated, and the two decided to submit the issue to arbitration, so they approached the lion.

As they approached the lion on his throne, the donkey started screaming: ′′Your Highness, isn’t it true that the grass is blue?”

The lion replied: “If you believe it is true, the grass is blue.”

The donkey rushed forward and continued: ′′The tiger disagrees with me, contradicts me and annoys me. Please punish him.”

The king then declared: ′′The tiger will be punished with 3 days of silence.”

The donkey jumped with joy and went on his way, content and repeating ′′The grass is blue, the grass is blue…”

The tiger asked the lion, *“Your Majesty, why have you punished me, after all, the grass is green?”

The lion replied, ′′You’ve known and seen the grass is green.”

The tiger asked, ′′So why do you punish me?”

The lion explains to him:

  • It has nothing to do with whether the grass is blue or green. Your punishment comes from the fact that it is not possible that a brave and intelligent creature like you could have wasted his time arguing with a madman and a fanatic who does not care about truth or reality, but only of the victory of his beliefs and his illusions. Never waste time with arguments that just don’t make sense … There are people who, no matter what evidence they are presented with, are not able to understand. And others, blinded by their egos, hatred and resentment, will never want one thing: to be right even if they are wrong.

When ignorance cries out, intelligence is silent.
Peace and quiet are priceless …

56

This just in. Keep in mind, until an autopsy is done, we don’t know which (COVID-19, Ivermectin, or both) killed him. All I can do is shake my head concerning this case. She seems to blame the hospital staff for her husband’s death, but the truth is, he wasn’t doing well due to COVID-19 and Ivermectin is not approved for COVID Tx. He might have died anyway or the Ivermectin rushed the process. We won’t know until an autopsy is done, if it is done. Given that she would not say if he was vaccinated or not, I’d say he wasn’t. Another note, their Xianity didn’t help them with this virus.

Blockquote He received two doses before Keith’s condition grew worse, and the doctor halted the treatment.

Blockquote Whether the drug is effective in treating COVID-19 is unproven and studies cited by its proponents have been dismissed as being biased and including incomplete or nonexistent data. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved the use of the drug to treat COVID-19, and the National Institutes of Health does not recommend its use. It is not included in UPMC’s COVID-19 treatment protocols.

Blockquote He received his first dose on Dec. 5, two days after Vedder’s decision in the court case. After Keith received a second dose, the doctor overseeing the drug’s administration – a physician not affiliated with UPMC – ended the treatment as Keith’s condition deteriorated.

Blockquote Her husband’s death has shaken Darla’s faith.

Blockquote “And God? Remains to be seen,” she wrote. “At the moment we are not on speaking terms and we may never be again. I don’t know. We are where we are.”