According to you it’s questionable when they wrote the first police report said there was no gun found at the scene and it’s credible when they wrote about the second police report that the gun was there. So go figure
Oh another good one. The ones who fabricated the lie about it being a suicide, just plum forgot to say there was shotgun there
.thats what you say. They just plain old forgot!!
Not surprised by your non response. You brought up journalism, but won’t say what it is, beyond some random examples.
And you won’t address the logical problems of your theory, like why a sophisticated attempt to cover up a murder wouldn’t include a critical piece of evidence to make it look like suicide.
I dont have a theory. I have issues how this story has developed and how facts change over time .
That’s the “I’m just asking questions” fallacy.
“A person “just asking questions” will set the stage by plausibly claiming he or she can be persuaded if you would merely answer the question. Rather than make the allegation and explain why it proves their point, they shift the burden to their opponent by asking a question with a vague reference to a story they heard. (“I heard this rumor, and if it isn’t true, you’ll certainly prove me wrong, right?”) But it’s difficult to respond to allegations that are vague or based on falsehoods. Likewise, it’s not possible to respond to a half-formed argument phrased as a question unsupported by evidence. There’s nothing substantive to respond to. But by being unable to “answer the question,” the person being questioned looks belligerent, unresponsive and evasive.”
Its called the centre for inquiry and what is the falsehood that you say i am perpetuating ?
Talk to the people responsible for that news. Do you expect us to help you or just continue the rumor?
I for one, won’t be part of any conspiracy that is designed to hurt someone else.
But you don’t want to hear that, do you?
The falsehood is the argument you’ve been making. Obvious trolling there.
“Inquiry” means investigating, examining all evidence, including the quality of sources, motives, the logic of the statements made, calculating probabilities.
For what it’s worth:
The judge wrote:
The Court finds that since Mr. Middleton’s death, the Middletons have been harassed by individuals with outlandish, hurtful, unsubstantiated, and offensive conspiracy theories regarding Mr. Middleton, his death, and his family, which have caused the Middletons immense harm and anguish.
These same individuals have indicated and communicated that they will attempt to obtain the File, including Media Content depicting Mr. Middleton’s body and the scene of his death, by way of an Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request.
The purpose of this Order is to prevent further irreparable injury to the Middletons.
The Court notes that Defendants do not object to the issuance of injunctive relief
The Court finds that there is a likelihood of success on the merits.
The Court finds that the Middletons have a protected privacy interest in the Media Content contained within the file based on their showing that (1) the Middletons want to keep the Media Content private and confidential; (2) that, except for government action, i.e. disclosure in response to a FOIA request, such Media Content can be kept private and confidential; and (3) that a reasonable person would find the disclosure of the Media Content harmful or embarrassing.
As recently as last week, a supermarket tabloid featured Middleton’s death on its cover and carried an article including unsubstantiated speculation that he might have been murdered. The article mentioned his work almost 30 years ago as a campaigner for Bill Clinton and contacts with the late Jeffrey Epstein early in Clinton’s White House years.
The family has said Middleton was being treated for depression.
What would the motivation be for murdering a washed up has been?
Also, “contacts with Epstein.” Epstein had contact with hundreds of people, so what?
Where does anyone explain what these “contacts” were, and what they amount to??
Where’s the where there???
In a way it sounds more like the Dog Whistle Show in action. Key tune, “Epstein & Clinton”, “death”, oh boy the mongers are creaming their jeans, we got another scandal to play with.
OK, I’ll bite. So what are you saying? Are you saying the Clintons are crooked, killing their aides for some bizarre reason, and this one they set up to make it look like suicide? If that’s what you’re saying, I’d like to hear how you come to those conclusion about the Clintons. What is your reasoning for such conclusions.
If anything it could be a set-up to prevent Hillary from running and winning this time.
It is her enemies who will stop at nothing to ruin this public servant who gave her life in service to the Nation.
She was investigated for 3 years and no criminal conduct was found and no recommendation was made for any prosecution of any kind.
Hillary did her job the best she could under difficult circumstances, as she did for her entire life.
Her enemies are the ones who want to kill her and if they cannot do it physically, they have tried to do it by character assassination, time and time again.
But in my book Hillary Clinton stands proud and strong in her place in History.
If it had not been for this unwarranted “investigation” and “untimely” report by Comey, Hillary might well have been our president instead of Trump.
And today it appears her enemies are making sure that she will not run against Trump, because this time she would beat this true criminal by a mile.
Let’s not forget, it is Republicans who will not shy away from violence and murder to gain power. The record is clear and demonstrable.
What rubbish is this? Can you come up with a non question begging argument to support your claim that I am trolling here?
I dont know Mriana. It looks sus to me. The story changed in 24 hrs about the gun that was hidden in plain site. And then climbing on a tree limb tying yourself with electrical cord shooting yourself in the chest with a shotgun (long barrel?) and hanging yourself with the gun 30 feet 10 metres away. Or was it hang first and shoot yourself later ?? Even the Arkansas Times is calling it an apparent suicide
Would be a great myth busters episode.
There is a list of 400 clinton affiliates that have had violent deaths over the years that either either associated directly or indirectly with the clintons through the clinton foundation. Would you like to see this list for you to view. Even if its only 10 percent worthy of scrutiny thats 40 people.
I would like to see the list and its original publishing source.
Let’s see if they will allow you to show it.
I hate describing trolling. You keep making a claim with no evidence. Your evidence is a lack of evidence from one source that is known for misleading news, and they printed a retraction. You asked me what claim you were making. How could you not know?
I doubt he ever checked even one. Lists like this usually contain people that aren’t even dead.
Oh my god. There was no retraction. The police changed their report. Stop strawmanning
I havent made a claim. I presented what we are being told about this
No . They are all dead. Kaput
Would you like to view the list? Anybody?
You don’t know what that word means. What evidence do you have that the police changed their report? They keep track of those things. There are facts that can be checked. Unlike the Daily Mail that can print anything they want.
You dont know when to quit digging a hole
CID and the coroner were on site . No gun found. Its all in the daily mails first report on this. But you dont care to read. Just argue
He his spouting a concept of “death by association”, which also makes him a suspect of murdering everyone he has known in his life and died other than from old age.
