IOW you have nothing that proves anything in that movie.
“It’s not availble. It has been lost. It has been removed. But I promise it was real.”
Take your word for it?
Still haven’t watched the public airing of the Commission investigation, have you?
That’s why you have no evidence. The commission has it all!
Honestly, once more, following this thread is for me diving in a totally different world.
In France, the votes are dropped in the ballot boxes which are open in schools the day of the vote.
Each mayor nominates people to preside the voting office and they are assisted by voluntaries or people designed by the candidates. Each candidate can nominate a delegate in each vote office, to represent him, takes notes and give his opinion, if asked.
At the end of the vote, the ballots are counted and the number is compared to the number of people having signed the register.
The ballots are divided between tables and the counting of the votes is done by citizen who volunteer, 4 at each table. One read the ballot, passes it to a neighbor who checks, and the two other count. the votes obtained by each candidate on special sheets.
The results of each table are written down on a public board added and the result is transmitted to the township and so.
Electronic votes are not much used by fear of frauds. the vote by mail has been suppressed because of the frauds, but the vote by proxy is allowed and easy.
there are frauds, nevertheless …
France and USA are 2 different worlds.
We drop ours in ballot boxes and they are [allegedly] counted that day. We also have poll watchers, who are generally volunteers. Poll watchers generally check your ID and see if you are on the voting rolls and if you are in the right the place to vote. We also have volunteers who count the votes and they are rechecked. Early voting is limited and one has to qualify, based on certain criteria, to vote early. Voting drop boxes are almost non-existent. Absentee voting is available for those overseas- military, citizens living outside the States, etc. Voter fraud hardly exists.
Actually, it’s not that much different, although there is some differences. Some of what has been said here about voting is not accurate. I think, if you were to migrate here (I know you’re not, but theoretically), you would find that it isn’t that much different. The stuff by mikeyote is conspiracy theory and not worth paying attention to.
Dude! You act like he is lapping up what you are saying and eager for more. What are you not getting from what Lausten is saying? When one says something is “pointless”, they mean it’s not worth their time and they don’t agree with what is said. He even said your data doesn’t show any of what you’re saying. No one, who has access to the real world of U.S. politics and voting, is going to take your word for it. Please what the hearings to get the real truth and facts of the illegal things that were done, especially by the dotard.
Mikeyote is posting conspiracy and it not what happens.
Thanks Mriana
Then possibilities of fraud are very limited.
My experience has shown to me that mistakes can occur. Case of massive fraud are very exceptional. In fact, they need the involvement of local authorities. And these being Republican in the edge states …
No, but you have, and you’ve told me what they say. They say lies. They misinterpret data. I’ve been over this a dozen times.
Exactly. Not sure if you could view the first hearing concerning the dotard’s crimes, but even Bill Barr admitted he told the dotard that his (the dotard’s) fraud theory was BS and that he informed the dotard he really did lose the election.
A Republican candidate for governor of Georgia refuses to concede after receiving 3% of the vote and calling the election “rigged” - serving as a timely reminder of what the January 6th public hearings are all about.
Taylor, a far right Christian nationalist who ran on a conspiracy theory-ridden platform challenging the so-called “Luciferian Cabal” of supposed elites in the government, received only 3.4 percent of the votes, losing to Kemp by an over 70-point margin and trailing behind runner-up David Perdue by over 18 points.
The race had been called for Kemp on the night of the primary last Tuesday. Perdue was the Trump-endorsed candidate and the only Republican gubernatorial candidate who stood any chance of unseating Kemp in this year’s race. He called Kemp to concede last Tuesday night as official sources called the race.
Yup “Facts” are facts and liars are liars. Welcome to Neo-Republican Party
Oh and comparisons can be dishonest.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/530003-stacey-abrams-rejects-comparison-between-her-refusal-to-concede-and/
Here’s a little data dump for those curious about Republican Voter Suppression, which seems to get almost no air time, because Democrats concede to losing way too easily.
++++++++++++++++++++++
Mike is repetitive, and I give him more time than I should, but the things he says come from elected officials and major news networks. It used to be just fringe groups, but those groups were literally invited to storm the capital by the President.
They are a minority, but they have figured out to get people in congress and block legislation supported by the majority.
No, I don’t think anyone here is wanting to get off political ideology and look at the actual facts and science. Something that should be a non-issue.
Recapping where this post is at.
2000 Mules has a couple of thousand cell phone that have been to non-profits. Then to 10 or more voter drop boxes. Plus over 4M minutes of video of the drop boxes. All this follows a whistleblowers story of organized voter fraud taking place.
All I have ask are these fact beyond question? Do they follow any science and facts that would be upheld in a court of law?
Basically asking if this 2000 Mules data is a conspiracy or fact.
The response has been conspiracy.
So, what would be a logical reason for these cell phone to be driving to a non-profit. Then going to 10 or more drop boxes?
Asking that question is like asking religious fanatics why god doesn’t stop by and say hello. Which is got me wondering if there isn’t a religious faction hiding as progressives here.
The second response here is that there seems to be an understanding of what 2000 Mules means. That is, there has been an organized over throw of an election. It seems like all the Trump hating fanatic are running to Jan 6th to circle the wagons.
If 2000 Mules is correct. Then Jan 6th was not an act of sedition. It was an act of patriotism. This 2000 Mules should be investigated before any conclusions are drawn on actions taken Jan 6th.
Were the people carrying American flags at the capital patriots trying to save the government or people trying to over throw the government?
Right now I really don’t care. Because I want to look at the facts that would stand up in court first. After knowing and understanding the relevant fact that are available. I can make up my mind. Remember politically I am a constitutionalist.
Actually not a bad summary. And just like the guilliani “hearings”, no, there is no data that would stand up. If there is, why aren’t they going to court? That’s rhetorical, it’s because they want to air it in the court of public opinion and keep winning seats in the less populated blue districts.
You still have not shown how this voter fraud took place.
Exactly what did people do that constituted voter fraud? Altered ballots? Burnt ballots, Added ballots. How exactly was the fraud committed . I bet you don’t know.
You only know what has been alleged.
Watch the Commission proceedings. That is real , not some sly whispers and inuendos.
Or are you a case that “can’t handle the truth”?
John Eastman, in Trump’s circle, said they should avoid the courts, because it might “tank their strategy”. This guy knew he was lying and did it anyway.
Or, start here, and 3 hours 15 minutes and listen to all of the people in Trump’s inner circle who told him he was wrong. Wrong about voter fraud, wrong about what Pence could do, wrong for repeating his baseless claims. Even Sean Hannity. The DOJ and courts did review the evidence, and found nothing. How can all of those people be wrong?
Go to the links in my previous posts. And you can see them in court and look at cases and upcoming cases. Most of the data is on two websites. True the Vote & Dinesh D’Souza’s websites.
Example, Alma Juarez Enters Guilty Plea in Yuma County Ballot Harvesting Case. And the investigation is still ongoing.
8:15 on podcast is some data you are looking for.
Or
Go to. The Epoch Times Videos. Title: Facts Matter (June 6): 2 Days After ‘2000 Mules’ Presentation, Former Mayor Pleads Guilty to Ballot Harvesting in AZ.
Key points - claims this was going on nation wide in certain areas.
At first it was seen in the Democrat high crime big cities in key states. But now the mainly Spanish speaking Democrat area in the same key state seemed to have been active too.
Be careful and get more than one source if possible. A lot of bad data being pushed right now. I noticed Fox is staying away for now. I expect after a dozen case prosecuted in AZ, NJ, or GA. I would expect Fox to be stepping in.
And you still haven’t answered the question I ask you.
Obviously I am not good at explaining the details. Please go to the True the Vote & Dinesh D’Souza’s websites.
You seem to want to make this about me. The task here in not the Jan 6th event. It is the 2000 Mules documentary.
Please lets us hear your logical reason for cell phone to go from non-profits to over ten voter drop boxes.
It looks the same isolated cases we’ve duscussed, and hearings and open investigations. They keep doing these, and they result in nothing. Doesn’t that mean anything to you?
I shall let the 1/6 Congressional Investigative Commission speak for me. They are right on TV for all to see. And if you claim that they are all conspiring against Trump and his band of domestic terrorists, we’re done talking.
You are making the claim of fraud, the burden of proof is on you and a movie is not proof of any kind. there have been hundreds of court cases dismissed. And here you are going to reverse history? Who are you? A disgruntled ex-roughneck?
OK, was Trump wrong? What will the science tell us?
That’s what 2000 Mules is about. All we have to do is check it out.
That non partisan commission is run by the same people who told us that ALL AMERICANS GOT OUT OF AFGHANISTAN, inflation is transitory, the New Green Deal would cost nothing, lies about the origin of Covid-19, lies about boarder walls, Kavanaugh, Borders under control, high gas prices were because of Trump, Trump’s Russian connections, the Steele dossier, and on, and on, and on.
Why would I want to hear more lies?
I get your point. But at this point of repeatedly coordinated media and Democrat lying. They need to give me an insurance policy that would pay off every time they lied for me, for me to listen to them.
Still don’t get it.
The movie said there was voter fraud. But you want to make it about me instead of trying to use science. If you can’t answer a simple question. Then is the question to hard or against your religion?
You have heard only lies. It’s time you heard the truth.!!!