That’s what the hypernormalization article was saying.
One reaction to it is to check out, throw up the hands and say there is nothing that can be done. Another is like greenhammer, randomly point to real problems and randomly assign blame, muddy the waters instead of seeking solutions. It’s hard to tell if he is a victim of the propaganda or propagator of it, which is how propaganda works.
Too deep for me. Can you dumb it down.
Well, in the end we all have but one life to live and one death to die. We can’t control the world around us, all we can hope to influence is ourselves and how we process the information around us.
Holding on to one’s sanity, humanity and a retaining a little humor is our own responsibility
We are in some ways victims of circumstance, and trapped within our skins and what life has dished out to use. It is ours to deal with it as best we can. Externally and internally.
Retaining a sense of sanity requires knowing oneself and achieving a certain balance.
Making do with that is an internal task requiring self-recognition, and work.
And you know, it has all been said before,
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.
Wish I could have given this more time and a better response, but my multi-ring circus has started and I better get my head “present” to dealing with little humans running around, and keeping them on safe side of the calamity line.
So far a skinned knee has been the worst of it.
But thanks for the feedback, I’ll sure be chewing on it, and a better more concise response.
See ya
That’s a very respectful answer to someone who is saying they don’t understand what it means to think for themselves and has demonstrated that they don’t want to try.
It’s a bit hard to believe, since, who else are you thinking for? If you know your name and have a basic understanding of language, what is going on inside your head? If you can read and then rephrase something, where did that occur other than your " interior self"?
If the request is to express thoughts from one’s self is “too deep”, where does the thought that it’s too deep come from?
Have you considered its a you thing? I have influenced lots at home , with friends, at the workplace and public discourse through my political activities and membership.
How do you mean that?
Fair enough, if you know anything about me, you’ll know I can make the same claims.
Where do we go from here?
When the time to change has run out and all that’s left on a grand scope of things is to run out the clock. so to speak.
Then why say all we can hope to influence is ourselves???
Perhaps because all those efforts have been profound failures.
Whether
Or
Or
Or
And if it’s not to crush me, what’s to do?
Etc.
Etc.
You are born into this world alone (even if one has a wombie(s)) and you shall die alone
and every night you go to bed you are left alone with your thoughts, even if someone is lying next to you.
I, myself and me, is the essential first circle, all others are built upon.
{Like a building is limited by the kind and quality of foundation it has under it.}
I’m the only one I can sort of “control” or direct (might be the better term).
Well the pitter patter of little feet are starting, time to run . . . . . . .
So it is a you thing and now you have checked out
Check out from saving the world?
Yup, if you say so.
Our world is in hospice territory and no one is interested in any sort of change.
As for your “you” thing - you have no clue how much I sacrifice for children and other’s in my life. Stop making yourself judge and jury for people you known nothing about.
Why not send me some help big mouth??? - I have 1500+ postcards left waiting for stamps.
**If you include a list of addresses, I’d be honored to send postcards to who you think might get something out of it.
Put some money behind your attitude**!**
I’m exhausted by the all-pervading apathy.
But I imagine posing is all I can expect . . .
You choose to use the words “can only influence ourselves” and “profound failure” in a moment of self reflection
I quote this rule a lot:
This community exists, first and foremost, to foster inquiry. Inquiry does not flourish in an atmosphere of heated rhetoric, mutual vilification or recrimination. Disagreements should be kept, as much as possible, to the issues at hand and not become overly personalized
In this case, I don’t need the example that follows it because the personal nature of your post is so flagrant.
You were warned a while ago, but they don’t expire. That’s two. 3 and you’re out
And we each choose for ourselves “WHAT YOU WILL BE PRESENT TO.”
Oh and don’t you know what it means to try and have a dialogue - or do you just yell at others?
What CC is expressing is commonly understood. That he is willing to discuss it shows an openness and an understanding of what it is to be human. He isn’t isolated in these thoughts and didn’t come to them from frustration or despair. At least, not as far as I can tell. My reason for this conclusion is my shared understanding of humanity that can be confirmed from evidence gathered over centuries.
The Only Person You Can Change Is You | Psychology Today
It might be one of the biggest frustrations of human life that you can’t forcibly change another person’s mind or viewpoint. It doesn’t mean you don’t share ideas. It doesn’t mean you don’t share insights, articles, information, or interests with those you care about. It means that in order to make lasting change, real change that resonates throughout the Universe, you have to start with you.
Might as well, give another update.
Finishing up with:
… The one thing we can be thankful for: meteorologists saw this coming. The National Hurricane Center correctly predicted Melissa’s rapid intensification, a sign that science can sometimes give us a warning. However, that progress depends on funding, today gutted, and ignored, treated as the largest con job ever.
Well, here’s a top secret: the work of understanding and predicting storms like Melissa requires sustained public investment. That research gives people precious hours to move, brace, or hide. Not enough to stop the storm, but enough to survive. And survival is no small thing when a Category 5 hurricane is rewriting what was possible in the Atlantic.
Meanwhile, my friend Francisco is still offline in Jamaica, where the promise of margaritas by the sea turned into a bunker-searching quest, along with thousands of people who had nothing to do with this climate chaos but are living its consequences. Their homes, their towns, their lives are all part of the fallout from a fossil-fueled planet spinning beyond its balance. It is human suffering sharpened by physics, heat, and greed.
The season is far from over …
RICKY LANUSSE
- OCT 28, 2025
It’s a good article, especially if you want to learn about hurricanes, the how and why they are getting more powerful and destructive and such .
And it’s such a crying shame, …(snip)…
All political. Years ago I posted the prediction of hurricanes by our top sciences and used by our military and shipping industry explaining the hurricane cycles and why they would be more powerful in this part of earth’s cycle. The problem is that two pathways have been taken. One is to follow the science. The other is used by the self-exclaimed elites who claim to follow the science and blame people with opposite political ideas as stupid and deniers. The use of fear and political funding to follow a pathway of points of no returns and tipping points that have never come true reflected a science built upon political funding.
“progress depends on funding”. What progress are they talking about? Hurricanes are understood. How many hundreds of billions have been spent on so called Climate Change? Who’s pockets has that money ended up in?
You are a piece of work
https://www.nrdc.org/bio/zanagee-artis/unveiling-big-oils-campaign-lies
But then Mike Yohe looks at a totalitarian and sees his savior -
then we have the science
You have posted no science. All political. Even the IPCC has its definition of Climate Change. The IPCC is part of and controlled by the UN. The UN today came out with its own definition of Climate Change because the IPCC is now starting to move away from the political definitions.
Even Bill Gates who has spent billions promoting the end of time due to Climate Change flipped a 180 today saying Climate Change will not cause all the problems that he has claimed in the past and people of earth will be able to deal with human-made emissions.
You have no predictions or timelines that are worth the time of day. Throwing shit on the wall to see what sticks is not science.
Quite the deflection.
That boy’z quick,.
What drives scientists? - Richard Alley’s Golden Nugget
UQx Denial101x Making Sense of Climate Science Denial
You are an unequivocal liar. There are plenty of timelines, that have been shown to be plenty accurate enough. Look at the F’n news, storms, flood, etc, like never before in human history are here!!!
For every action there is a reaction. Everyone agrees that human activities will add to earth’s warming. Now let’s look at the science. Where are your datum points or lines? They started with the ice cores. But there are problems that still have not been solved. Like why do the CO2 levels always follow the warming?
Are the human activities measurable? Not really. Thousands of articles claim they are measurable. But none of them can show scientific proof in court.
What are the bases for your science? Most likely the IPCC. The IPCC was formed by the UN not to supply the most probable outcome of Climate Change. Not even the most likely outcome of Climate Change. When sea levels were estimated to rise an extra four inches in a century. The IPCC followers were predicting a twenty-foot rise. Points of no return and tipping points were declared and then changed when not met. NASA, the military and major insurance providers, did not buy into the IPCC reports. Because the IPCC was formed to provide the UN with the worst disastrous possible outcome of Climate Change. Even though everyone knew it would not happen, the UN want to be prepared. The worst-case stories got the grants, and the science deniers got their political science. In America it boiled down to those who believed in science and a democratic government. And those who are greedy and think they are part of the elite system of the smart vs. the deplorables.
Show me your datum points of your science!
Don’t tell me if humans were not on earth there would be no floods or storms. Show me there has never been flooding in human history like we have today.
That is all BS.
The IPCC even says their data is bad. They need a minimum of eighty more years of data before they can start making the 30 climate models match. In other words. They don’t have any datum points yet that are good enough to make the climate models match.
