Blockquote
one doesn’t end up with a phrase that makes sense
When one writes just that alone, he doesn’t…now do you have anything that makes sense to say player?
or do you think you have to spend time and effort player?
Let’s see how much you player make with your actions here…
What do you player think?..
I’m not taking your bait. Your posts often lack coherency, so asking others to be clear is ironic.
do you then think you have to spend time and effort here player?
Let’s see how much you player make sense with your actions here…
What do you player think?
Come one, what is it so hard for a clever player like yourself to understand?
Players wake up here…
I am being for real…
you keep imagining stuff…
and keep wasting my time and effort with replies without arguments…
…wakey, wakey players…and don’t worry…I am still waiting for you…
This, “When one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one doesn’t end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at any time in their history up to now, because if you mathematicians REALLY think otherwise…”
That is not understandable. Who is counting phrases with numbers? What is the noun in the phrase; “When one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians”? When you count, you wouldn’t end up with a phrase. Why leave off at the elipses?
I still say it’s nothing more than a form of evangelism and unless one answers with some lame religious answer, he will continue with the annoying “wakey, wakey” crap.
I think it is an AI. His avatar and posts all point to a programmed mind.
this is the whole phrase player, if you just post the first part the phrase is incomplete…
When one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one doesn’t end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at any time in their history up to now, because if you mathematicians REALLY think otherwise…
When one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one can end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at some time in their history up to now, but if you mathematicians think this REALLY makes sense to you…
If in the end mathematicians, when one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one can end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at some time in their history up to now, then it doesn’t seem to me that all humans up to now throughout their history made sense by talking to one another honestly and not only by counting one another with numbers without any regard to honesty ever spoken…does it seem to you mathematicians?
You didn’t explain why you reached that conclusion player…you need a reason if you are interested in making some point here…
…unless you are just throwing your conclusions here and there to see if the fish bite in the forum…
…do we really have to spend time and effort with players such as you, all attitude and no arguments?
What is it so hard for such a clever player as yourself to really understand?
Nah player, you didn’t think anything, just wrote the first dumb shit that came into your mind…
…why don’t you try thinking next time?
Some of you pretty ladies here are under the impression that we will waste my time and effort with idiots replying with their conclusions and no arguments why we should spend time and effort with their viewpoints…
…players if you yourselves replying here don’t think before you do that, do you really think we are going to spend time and effort to think about you?
Wake up players, and this time try to think and provide arguments…
…and cut the “oh, I don’t understand”, if you don’t understand, and this is nonsense to you,
…do you really have to spend time and effort reading my post?
What is it so hard for you players to understand?
Why say that the following phrase is nonsense?
“The consistency of axioms cannot be proved within their own system.” (<-- google it)
Because: A system which has axioms for itself, in order for the system to call them axioms for itself, the system has to have a consistent behavior around those axioms and so when it behaves inconsistently with regard to those axioms, the inconsistency between those axioms and the system’s behavior the system can prove to itself.
If what is written above is false, then when a system behaves inconsistently with regard to some axioms it has for itself, that inconsistency it cannot prove to itself, and it keeps behaving inconsistently with regard to those axioms…but…
if the system keeps behaving inconsistently with regard to some axioms and cannot prove to itself that it does so with regard to those axioms, then it doesn’t seem to me it can consistently keep regarding them as axioms for the system, and then something else replaces them, and that something else is what the system calls axioms for itself.
But what do I mean by all the above exactly?
Mathematicians…
in order to remain alive, you have to keep breathing…and this is an axiom for your system…that you can prove consistently throughout your entire life…
so breathe idiots…breathe…
When one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one doesn’t end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at any time in their history up to now, because if you mathematicians REALLY think otherwise…
When one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one can end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at some time in their history up to now, but if you mathematicians think this REALLY makes sense to you…
If in the end mathematicians, when one counts phrases with numbers mathematicians, one can end up with a phrase that makes sense for humans at some time in their history up to now, then it doesn’t seem to me that all humans up to now throughout their history made sense by talking to one another honestly and not only by counting one another with numbers without any regard to honesty ever spoken…does it seem to you mathematicians?
When numbers happen before words happen, words don’t make sense after numbers happen, or else
When numbers happen before words happen, words can make sense after numbers happen, but…
If in the end when numbers happen before words happen, words can make sense after numbers happen, then it doesn’t seem to me now what numbers where counting before, that is worth saying…does it seem to you?
When numbers happen after words happen, words make sense before numbers happen, or else
When numbers happen after words happen, words don’t make sense before numbers happen, but…
If in the end when numbers happen after words happen, words don’t make sense before numbers happen, then it doesn’t seem to me now that numbers make sense to happen after those specific words…does it seem to you?
Yeah. You just aren’t worth it. You have no intention of clarifying. You write obscure sentences that lack grammar, let alone logic. You allude to complex ideas, like Godel’s incompleteness theorem, but don’t apply it to anything. Then you berate anyone who responds because they aren’t clever enough.
What is the point?
It’s the pattern of an evangelical, they claim to have some “higher” knowledge, and if you don’t get it, then they tell you there is something wrong with you, and that they have the cure for you.
And it’s going around testing its responses. This one is good, someone just responded with a different form of words strung together that almost form sentences.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?184007-Words-and-numbers
Reddit spam filters deleted it.
No I did in fact do some thinking on the matter and I 've come to the conclusio that you are either an AI or you are a sub-par human intellect. Take your pick.
Looks like someone is plagiarizing. That’s to be expected of wannabe intellectuals like AlexandrosTsolis, a real player of children’s games.
The comments under “petition to ban Tsolis” in reddit are pretty scathing. I like to think of CFI as a more tolerant forum, But, I’m going to lock the thread, pending further discussion with the moderators.
Well he’s not very intelligent if he’s plagiarizing.
Because you sound like an evangelist attempting to evangelize.
I’m not spending any time and effort on your lame riddle, which is apparently plagiarized.
Exactly he’s not and I’m not sure why anyone is attempting to answer any of his questions and junk. He’s a waste of time.
It this point, I’m not sure if I care or not if the thread is locked, because he’s not going to say anyone is correct, with maybe the exception of some sort of god theory.