There’s no evidence he was a groyper.
Kirk was an “influencer” and whether we like it or not, the young people can be swayed by them.
Most far Right Wing Americans think Kirk was too weak on important issues, but he could be a “stepping stone” in the right direction. I could link to some of them directly, but they might be too controversial for CFI.
The “Slav squat” meme comes from a variation of the Pepe the Frog image, a pudgy cartoon toad that has become a calling card for young men on the hard edge of America’s Right.
Pssst - thats tyler on the right
If they are intended to show something about Kirk or the Groypers, then it’s not controversial. If the language is bad, you could warn us, like don’t play the video in public or whatever
For me Charlie Kirk, racist, homophobic, spreader of plot theories, negating Trump defeat in 2020, i an ultra right man.
And the way he was able to cause media lynching on opponents and people denouncing his lies does not endear him to me.
Charlie Kirk positions about key issues
I would be sincerely interested to know what the true ultra right people reproaches him, and the views of these people on the same issues, or others.
So what? Teens do stupid, nonsensical things all the time.
Fortunately, there are people investigating this guy seriously, and there’s no evidence he had strong political views, other than he recently started dating a tranny and became more liberal about trans rights.
Charlie Kirk was the most mainstream conservative in America and he was murdered for being a “fascist.” The ghouls who celebrated his death and who took pleasure in destroying his family consider all of us “fascists.” The lunatic who did this will doubtlessly inspire other copycat killers. Virtually everyone who reads and comments on this website is much further to the Right of Charlie Kirk.
I strongly disagreed with many of Charlie Kirk’s positions. But my deeper objection was that I saw him as a Conservative Inc. gatekeeper, positioned to prevent people from journeying toward the real right: nationalism, populism, white identity, and an awareness of the Jewish Question. Gradually, I came to hate him. But over the last few years, I began to revise my opinion, because it became clear that Charlie Kirk was on the very journey that I thought he was trying to prevent others from taking. I still disagreed with him on Israel and Ukraine, but just since the beginning of this year, Kirk repeatedly stood against anti-whiteness, opposed H1Bs, discussed the Mossad-Epstein connection, attacked the myths about Martin Luther King, and even questioned the Civil Rights Act. His last post on X demanded that we politicize the murder of Iryna Zarutska to prevent other such crimes in the future.
One can only wonder where Charlie Kirk would have become in a few years after being inundated with mainstream conservative ideology on race and probably some kind of Christian attachment to Israel. He was definitely moving in the right direction and Blumenthal’s column definitely suggests that Netanyahu and Israel are blackmailing him, likely related to Epstein. Very interesting that Kirk refused Israeli financial support for Turning Point USA and argued with Trump about bombing Iran
I better understand.
For you, a true right man is a racist, against equality of men.
And a staunch supporter of capitalism.
He is also a lover of plot theories. The idea that Israel could be part to Charlie death is pure delirium.
I am not sure about the Jewish question. Does he mean Israël or all Jewish ?
In short, a fascist.
Yes to being against equality and antisemitic.
No to the other points.
How is this for a conspiracy theory. In nic cage film snake eyes , he plays Secretary of Defense, Charles Kirkland who gets shot in the neck by a guy called tyler !