In early 2001, I recognized the perpetual social dysfunction we endure. My analysis was not based on the then-recent tumultuous presidential election recount that year, but rather it was just my general observation and personal hardships with society. I vowed that I would find the problem and solve it. I never doubted my ability, but I did not realize how long it would take to find the root of the problem, construct a solution, and then describe it for the public.
Almost immediately upon my newfound meaning for my life, I encountered an episode of the Tonight Show, and Arseno Hall insisted that there was still a racial problem in America. So, he was recognizing a problem that was relative to my analysis, but I was not convinced that the racial stratification problem was the pathway to the general problem. And so, I continued my serendipitous search.
A couple of years later I encountered the atheistsā internet discussion forums. I thought that I had found the proving ground that I was looking for, but instead, I noticed errors in their arguments related to the definitions of the words significant to their unwitting doctrinaire. My arguments at the forums prompted my banishment. I was described to be a Christian troll, and not the brilliant independent critical thinker that I truly am.
Similar to the racial stratification grievance, I did not believe the atheistsā errors in their arguments were the path to the root of the more general problem. After a few more years of not encountering anything significant, I decided to begin research and development of my arguments concerning the atheistsā semantic errors, anyway.
In January of 2007, I was armed with a used laptop computer, plenty of time, and I began research in the Charlottesville public library. I began downloading articles written by atheists, probably some dictionary pages of the words that I was confident were erroneously defined, and then I found myself downloading articles that I found interesting, but unrelated to the subject of my thesis. That prompted me to begin constructing a folder system to organize those articles according to their subject matter. It did not take long until I realized that there should be a system available for scholarly academic researchers. Upon search queries on the subject, I found nothing. At some point, I realized the library classification system for the bookshelves was what I was looking for.
After a couple of days of constructing a folder system using the Dewey Decimal System, I realized it was too cumbersome, and did not lead me towards the subject areas as I thought that they should be organized. I reviewed the Library of Congress classification system and realized that I had found the root of the problem that I was looking for.
It was a eureka moment that no one else will ever experience.
The problem in the world is the lack of a reliable information classification system. It is the ultimate tool of the social agreement theory - if we do not agree to the definitions of the words we use to describe reality, then we encounter problems relative to the margin of error in those disagreements. A reliable classification system has many other uses, but an unreliable classification system, like the Dewey and Library of Congress systems, are limited in their application.
More specifically, a derivative of a reliable classification system provides reliable formatting for corporate and government charters.
