I would call that nonsense. There’s a difference between cheap talk on advertisements, and actual appreciation for the facts and consequences and then doing something about it.
It requires some homework to seriously understand the scientific underpinnings.
Most people are clueless (as Mike Yohe’s twisted renditions demonstrate) as today’s lack of serious public discussion and action makes clear.
Christ if any serious percent of the people, (that would include the masters of the universe, business leaders, their politician pets, their publicity campaign networks, had a clue, let alone gave a damned - our global resources wouldn’t still be squandered on insanity like this big dick war games of mass destruction between “east” and “west” we seem so disgustingly addicted to.
Guy, aren’t you a fan of FOX and perhaps even BreitBart and Newsmax? You sure come off sounding that way quite often. Be clear no one over there believes this “Follow the data” meme you wave - look at the entire Trumpkin MAGA Movement, it’s entire foundation is based on avoiding the data
and instead exploitation of deception, beginning with the Obama Birther lie, and the trumpsters then went from lie to lie, which also included high crimes and treason again American interests and its Constitution.
Those outlets ( FOX, BreitBart, Newsmax, and their masses of brainwashed unfortunates) are all about selling a storyline using emotionalizing, malicious projection and avoiding any sort of sober assessment of the facts and fundamentals at hand, be they socio-economic or earth-sciences related, and so on and so forth.
About climate change
Republican climate rhetoric shifts (again), but the goal remains the same.
By David Roberts@drvolts Updated Oct 31, 2018
Republicans Can Understand Science and Still Deny Climate Change
Climate skeptics aren’t generally more science illiterate than everyone else, according to a new poll.
By Robinson Meyer
OCTOBER 5, 2016
Climate Deniers in the 117th Congress
There are 139 elected officials in the 117th Congress who still deny the scientific consensus of human-caused climate change.
MAR 30, 2021
How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science
By Coral Davenport and Eric Lipton
- June 3, 2017
WASHINGTON — The campaign ad appeared during the presidential contest of 2008. Rapid-fire images of belching smokestacks and melting ice sheets were followed by a soothing narrator who praised a candidate who had stood up to President George W. Bush and “sounded the alarm on global warming.”
It was not made for a Democrat, but for Senator John McCain, who had just secured the Republican nomination.
It is difficult to reconcile the Republican Party of 2008 with the party of 2017, whose leader, President Trump, has called global warming a hoax, reversed environmental policies that Mr. McCain advocated on his run for the White House, …
The Depravity of Climate-Change Denial
Risking civilization for profit, ideology and ego.
Nov. 26, 2018
Want some cold hard facts to follow?
AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
The Working Group I contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report addresses the most up-to-date physical understanding of the climate system and climate change, bringing together the latest advances in climate science, and combining multiple lines of evidence from paleoclimate, observations, process understanding, and global and regional climate simulations.
AR6 Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
The Working Group II contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report assesses the impacts of climate change, looking at ecosystems, biodiversity, and human communities at global and regional levels. It also reviews vulnerabilities and the capacities and limits of the natural world and human societies to adapt to climate change.