How to interpret these curious REAL experimental results?

The universe doesn’t know that, we do and we have symbolized it.
Yes indeed we are the eyes of the universe.
No, that’s not what I am saying. Human do not create universal time, the universe does. Humans create their own individual time-lines, i.e time relative to events related to human existence.

What we have named time is our observation that certain events have regular durations or recurrence. Time is a mathematical term of a natural function. The orbit of earth around the sun is a function of time. The universe doesn’t know that, we do and we have symbolized it.


But in the end, it still sounds like, nothing so much as, intellectual escapism and avoidance of real living within this physical reality we have a very short time to savor.

 

Humans create their own individual time-lines, i.e time relative to events related to human existence.
What does that even mean?

“We create our own individual time-line?”

Humans perceive our time-line and the world around us, from within the organism that they are. How we happen to perceive the passage of time, compared to a fish, or a sequoia tree is irrelevant to the reality of Earth time and tides that all of us are embedded within.

We aren’t the master of the universe we love believing we are. Even if we have fantastic perceptual abilities.

Now, if only we had the brains to really absorb those perceptions without our self-centered egos constantly getting in the way of our understanding.

 

“We create our own individual time-line?”
I call it time-line as the time element of an individual world-line but the accepted term is world-line
The world line (or worldline) of an object is the path that object traces in 4-dimensional spacetime. It is an important concept in modern physics, and particularly theoretical physics.
The concept of a "world line" is distinguished from concepts such as an "orbit" or a "trajectory" (e.g., a planet's orbit in space or the trajectory of a car on a road) by the time dimension, and typically encompasses a large area of spacetime wherein perceptually straight paths are recalculated to show their (relatively) more absolute position states—to reveal the nature of special relativity or gravitational interactions.
The idea of world lines originates in physics and was pioneered by Hermann Minkowski. The term is now most often used in relativity theories (i.e., special relativity and general relativity).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_line

Hence my term of individual timeline as distinct from orbit and trajectory of an objects worldline.

Your personal time-line is expressed as your age, which is different from my personal time-line, i.e chronology of duration of continued existence from birth and … “counting”, regardless of trajectory or location.

Humans perceive our time-line and the world around us, from within the organism that they are. How we happen to perceive the passage of time, compared to a fish, or a sequoia tree is irrelevant to the reality of Earth time and tides that all of us are embedded within.
Indeed, imbedded as separate individual measurements within the larger universal time-line.

But IMO, we do not witness the passage of time as much as we witness the duration of passing measurable events from “caesium vibrations” to the “universal continuum”.

When nothing happens , time is not measurable, unless it is the measurement of duration between events.

Time always requires a… beginning –> duration –> end…, but time itself cannot be measured.

Its only “fixed” beginning of the universal timeline was during the BB. Everything that lives within it came later.

But we never express the age of something as 18.3 billion + 63 years. We say “his age (personal time-line) is 63 years old”.

Just ran across another timeline…:slight_smile:

That Time Daniel Dennett Took 200 Micrograms of LSD (In Another Timeline)

Daniel Dennett admits that he has never used psychedelics! What percentage of functionalists are psychedelic-naïve? What percentage of qualia formalists are psychedelic-naïve? In this 2019 quote, he talks about his drug experience and also alludes to meme hazards (though he may not use that term!..):
https://qualiacomputing.com/tag/gpt-3/

Well the acid does bring this entire line of reasoning into focus.

What we have here is a failure to communicate.

Along with a failure to recognize a simple fact of our human condition - namely: appreciating the Physical Reality ~ Human Mindscape divide.

 

You are talking about wonderful ideas people have, not the physical reality that we’re part of.

imbedded as separate individual measurements within the larger universal time-line.
So what does that have to do with the fundamental reality of time?
passage of time as much as we witness the duration of passing measurable events
You are a physical creature, all the two of you have (that is, your mind & your brain/body complex) is witnessing passing measurable events. Unless you're in deep sleep or passed out or dead.
When nothing happens
When does nothing happen in this Physical Reality we are embedded within? Your body bustling away nonstop your entire life. You spend your life moving from one experience to another, even if it's just eating and pooping and sleeping and waking then comes all the rest.
Time always requires a….. beginning –> duration –> end……
That's a conclusion some human minds have settled in on, because the idea is pleasing to them. But time is the most fundamental aspect of physical reality we have. Atoms are in nonstop motion, that is time, everything else flows from there.

Time is what pushed evolution forward. Without time there is nothing. Only within our minds can we kid ourselves into imagining time away.

Everything that lives within it came later.
Yes and that's everything we know. That's why I'm so unimpressed and uninterested with what happened before the BB, what does that matter, why not start paying at little attention to what's happening upon this f'n planet that we depend on for everything? We'd have found way more helpful lessons down here.

To @citizenschallengev3 and to @write4u.

<hr />

Your posts are really interesting. Thank you for sending them here in this forum. Please give me some time to consider these posts carefully and thoroughly. I will write to you in the nearest future.

Regards,

To @mrmhead.

<hr />

  1. Firstly, all that I can say about PART 3 of our first video is that the described-there mechanical phenomenon has been proved experimentally many (may be thousands of) times. The "X effect" exists no matter how small/big is the value of the force of friction inside the zig-zag channels. The "X effect" does not depend on the value of force of friction inside the zigzag channels. (Please refer to our previous posts, if you like.)
  2. Secondly, you wrote: "And why are there two sides of each apparatus? Couldn’t the same be demonstrated with one straight pipe and one zig-zag pipe?" Well, your idea seems to be an interesting variation and an original further development of the zig-zag concept. Yes, what would really happen, if we use one straight pipe and one zig-zag pipe? I don't know. It's worth to think over this variation. Wouldn't the one zig-zag pipe generate some large and low-frequency amplitude while the ball moves inside the zig-zag channels? Would the one zig-zag tube motion be a straight-line motion while the ball moves inside the zig-zag channels? In one word, how would the one zig-zag tube behave while the ball moves inside the zig-zag channels? What do you think? Let us consider carefully and thoroughly your suggestion. Looking forward to your answer.
So what does that have to do with the fundamental reality of time?
Fundamental reality of time is only associated with fundamental reality of space. Time is an emergent result of spatial activity. Without space there is no time, only a timeless permittive condition, which IMO, is what existed before the BB.
Time is what pushed evolution forward. Without time there is nothing. Only within our minds can we kid ourselves into imagining time away.
And what force does Time exert to "push" evolution? I believe you are looking at this from a reverse perspective. When there is nothing there is no time. There is absolutely no way to imagine time without a form of spatial (physical/geometric) chronology.

When there is nothing spatial, notions of durable existence disappear along with any notion of temporal measurement.

IMO, the dynamics of universal spatial geometry creates the dynamics of universal temporal chronology.

How can one measure time itself ? You cannot measure time without creating time. That’s why time is a unidirectional unfolding measurement of chronological physical durations. It has no properties in and of itself.

IMO, Einstein recognized this unbreakable association with the term “spacetime”. There is no independent theory of time unless in association with physical existence. There are three dynamical spatial dimensions and an emergent fourth temporal dimension of that dynamical spatial action.

I see no need for time as an independently existing dimension. I do see a need for independently existing spatial dimensions.

There are examples of zero dimensional points, 1 dimensional lines, 2 dimensional planes, 3 dimensional space. Only three of those dimensions can have a separately associated timeline (worldline), and only if those individual timelines point into the same direction, into the as yet timeless future.

Every atom in the universe has its own timeline within the greater universal timeline.

temporal dimension
A temporal dimension, or time dimension, is a dimension of time. Time is often referred to as the "fourth dimension" for this reason, but that is not to imply that it is a spatial dimension. A temporal dimension is one way to measure physical change.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension

To write4u.

<hr />

Nice comment. Need some time to consider it carefully.

which IMO, is what existed before the BB.
 
When there is nothing there is no time.
 
When there is nothing ---, notions of durable existence disappear
 
IMO
 
How can one measure time itself ? You cannot measure time without creating time.
 
IMO
 
There is no independent theory of time unless in association with physical existence.
 
I see no need for time as an independently existing dimension.
 
A temporal dimension is one way to measure physical change.
Can you explain what any of that has to do with the past four and a half years of evolution unfolding on this planet that creating this reality we live within?

 

All I see there is mind candy for people who rather play within their imagination, then observe the actual physical reality unfolding before our eyes.

It’s like you don’t even recognize the conjectural nature of all those concepts the geniuses are so proud of.

Nor the ego-centric nature of it.

 

Oh and I’ve never implied time was separate from physical reality.

Time is the driver of physical reality unfolding - is what I’ve said.

I couldn’t care less about what exists without the material reality surrounding us; to me that’s little different than investing a lot of time believing in and worrying about heaven. That stuff is absolutely the domain of our minds and not the physical reality surrounding us.

 

Can you explain what any of that has to do with the past four and a half years of evolution unfolding on this planet that creating this reality we live within?
The past four and a half billion years of evolution unfolding on this planet are only an extension of an event that began 13.8 billion years ago, with the self-organization of fundamental elements on which all of physical reality rests.
All I see there is mind candy for people who rather play within their imagination, then observe the actual physical reality unfolding before our eyes.
Wait a minute, that does not follow at all. On the contrary, I believe what you call mind candy (understanding the past) actually enhances appreciation of the physical reality that we are witnessing in the present. This is what I liked about Roger Antonsen's lecture. Looking at reality from several different perspectives allows for greater understanding of what it is you are witnessing.
It’s like you don’t even recognize the conjectural nature of all those concepts the geniuses are so proud of.
Are you saying Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, Galileo, Newton were merely speculating ? Or are these geniuses' conjectures the foundation on which all of modern science rest on?
Nor the ego-centric nature of it.
That's not fair. All of my conjectures which I qualify (IMO) rest on what I have gleaned from these giants . I take no credit for any originality in my posits. All my propositions rest on the logic of the old and modern scientists. I just present them from my personal POV. Anything wrong with that?

I like Plato for his imaginary Platonic solids on which physical reality is founded. I like Pythagoras for his cognition of functional wave frequencies. I like Newton for his discovery of Gravitational spacetime curvature. I like Edwards Lorentz for his Chaos Theory.

I also like the “common denominator” contained in all of these fundamental truths, their mathematical nature.

I like Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe because it solves so much of the mystery of the universal dynamics and points to a guiding equation that may eventually explain why it all works and why evolution from simple to complex patterns is a logical process, without mystery and magic.

IMO, mathematics solves the spiritual aspect of the universe, in that it is a quasi intelligent guiding blueprint of physical dynamics. It is the single common denominator in all of existence. The logic of mathematical dynamics of inherent values and functional processes speaks of an inherent quasi intelligent process requiring no consciousness, but is causal to the evolutionary processes we have witnessed from the very beginning.

Where do any of my musings conflict with your realist perspectives? I just like to look at what makes all this tick, without needing to resort to a motivated supernatural being that created this planet only for humans to enjoy, damned be the rest.

I look at the Universe and Nature with the greatest humility and appreciation of its majesty, but I don’t think it is all that complicated. Tegmark envisions some 32 fundamental algebraic values and a dozen or so fundamental equations on which everything can be built, given sufficient time and elemental resources.

But I also appreciate and firmly believe in Robert Hazen’s account of abiogenesis on earth and most likely elsewhere in the universe. It makes “sense”, and it is mathematical in essence… :slight_smile:

I am a retired musician/bookkeeper and only want to expand my horizons, but always keeping mainstream science in mind. I would not presume to know better than scientists who have dedicated lifetimes of study. I just voice what I believe is a fundamental logical understanding of their science.

I welcome constructive critique, but not derision.

 

 

Time is the driver of physical reality unfolding – is what I’ve said.
I disagree, IMO time is a function of unfolding physical reality.

The Illusion of Time: What’s Real?
By Robert Lawrence Kuhn July 06, 2015

Why is time controversial? It feels real, always there, inexorably moving forward. Time has flow, runs like a river. Time has direction, always advances. Time has order, one thing after another. Time has duration, a quantifiable period between events. Time has a privileged present, only now is real. Time seems to be the universal background through which all events proceed, such that order can be sequenced and durations measured.
The question is whether these features are actual realities of the physical world or artificial constructs of human mentality. Time may not be what time seems — this smooth unity without parts, the ever-existing stage on which all happenings happen.
Huw Price, professor of philosophy at Cambridge University, claims that the three basic properties of time come not from the physical world but from our mental states: A present moment that is special; some kind of flow or passage; and an absolute direction.
"What physics gives us," Price said, "is the so-called 'block universe,' where time is just part of a four-dimensional space-time … and space-time itself is not fundamental but emerges out of some deeper structure."
IMO, this deeper structure is based on abstract logic and mathematical in essence.
We sense an "arrow" or direction of time, and even of causation, he said, because our minds add a "subjective ingredient" to reality, "so that we are projecting onto the world the temporal perspective that we have as agents [in this environment]." [Alan Alda Asks: 'What Is Time?']
Think of the block universe, which is supported by Einstein's theory of relativity, as a four-dimensional space-time structure where time is like space, in that every event has its own coordinates, or address, in space-time. Time is tenseless, all points equally "real," so that future and past are no less real than the present.
https://www.space.com/29859-the-illusion-of-time.html

Hmm… seems my last post fell into a black hole?

Or maybe just another time-space ?

@W4u - The past four and a half billion years of evolution unfolding on this planet are only an extension of an event that began 13.8 billion years ago, with the self-organization of fundamental elements on which all of physical reality rests.
But they are the extension where biology emerged, and where awareness, then consciousness, emerged!

What happened beyond will always belong to the intellectual world of conjecture. It’s only bearing on our lives, is that it built the fundamental components and rules that ultimately created us - something that required our Earth to be created. What about understand our planet’s history and biology?

@W4u - Wait a minute, that does not follow at all. On the contrary, I believe what you call mind candy (understanding the past) actually enhances appreciation of the physical reality that we are witnessing in the present.
It's all in the dose! A little bit of booze enlightens, too much booze makes drunk and stupid.

When it blinds people to the physical biological reality unfolding up this planet we depend on, which it does too, too often - it’s a monstrosity! IMO.

@W4u - Are you saying Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, Galileo, Newton were merely speculating ?
Are you saying they weren't conjectures - until physical evidence provided overwhelming supporting evidence.

Didn’t they all have plenty of ideas that went into the trash bin with time?

@W4u - All my propositions rest on the logic of the old and modern scientists. ... Anything wrong with that?
I appreciate that. When I used "IMO", I was thinking "In Their Opinion" with all the emphasis on "opinion". When actual physical witnessing and measurements are impossible, it will always be a matter of opinion, supported by arguments. Yes, the very complex math used by the geniuses, never rise above learned opinion. Look at how String Theory has worked out. Decades of talk and math, but nothing concrete, with experts of equal qualifications saying it's garbage and others claiming it still hold promise as the salvation of physics. And when they get down to brass tacks they'll admit me have no way of 'knowing', never will.

I’m not even knocking the speculation, genius mathematics and philosophers that don’t know one end of a shove from another, need to be kept occupied some way. But, allowing that to blind us to what’s happening upon this planet will turn out to be our damnation. It more a question of priorities, yesterday’s heaven or the biological physical reality we exist within.

@W4u - I like Plato for his imaginary Platonic solids on which physical reality is founded
"upon which physical reality is founded" - seriously? Let me suggest another perspective on what Plato founded:
... imaginary Platonic solids on with our western intellectual reality is founded
When I think about Platonic imaginary perfection, I see another perfect example of 'being lost within one's own mindscape'. What he did seems to me an extension of our human expectation for a perfect God On High! People seeking some imaginary perfection that simply does not exist within physical reality. But that many still cling to.

Cue, Sabine Hossenfelder, a real physicist.

@W4u - I like Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe because it solves so much of the mystery of the universal dynamics and points to a guiding equation that may eventually explain why it all works .
"May eventually explain", this is what I'm talking about, the human conceit to fancy we're capable of absolute understanding, just like that perfect god we long for. How do humans come to "define" a systems with a nearly infinite layers within layers of complexity? How could one species even presume to take in the whole of what's unfolding.

Particular when we are talking about Earth and organism of infinity complexity, wrapped within folds upon fold of increasing intricate complexity, all unfolding and changing one moment at a time leading to the next moment.

@W4u - and why evolution from simple to complex patterns is a logical process, without mystery and magic
Are you claiming that the various processes of the Universe and Earth's Evolution don't already demonstrate plenty of logical process??

What’s are we lacking?

What’s wrong with a touch of mystery, as for magic, that’s a human crutch, best to do without, but when in need, who’s to judge? I mean a sense of magic is a beautiful thing and the better we get to learn about the organisms that inhabit this planet the more beautiful and mysterious and magical it can seem. Nothing wrong with acknowledging that and being aware of it.

The real issue here is, how we keep our bearings. Do we recognize that divide between our own mental image produced by our mind in conjunction with others, and the physical reality we interact with constantly.

 

I am angry at all this hairy fairy speculating about the dawn of time, because it used as an excuse not to look down and strive to understand this physical planet that provides our life support system and that we are destroying in a mad rush that is breathtaking to those with an appreciation for history and the eye to see what’s unfolding upon our planet, Earth, you could even say Mother Earth. F’ the heavens!!! We have a problem down here and so few are in the slightest prepared. And I’m talking spiritually, intellectually, we’re (we as in our whole society) too busy showing off to each other - to notice the important shit. I’m not trying to harsh you, it’s the whole I’m railing against. I appreciate you taking the time to respond. I’m sure going to use it to try and explain myself, hopefully not pissing off others too much.

@W4u. I just like to look at what makes all this tick, without needing to resort to a motivated supernatural being that created this planet only for humans to enjoy, damned be the rest.
That one's unbecoming, in a gaslighting sort of way.

WHERE HAVE I EVER INVOKED MOTIVATED SUPERNATURAL BEINGS ?

The closest I get is acknowledging that supernatural beings and shadow plays have always been humanity’s way of reconciling reality with our dreams and experiences.

It is a simply psychological reality, one that we should acknowledge, and that there’s nothing wrong with embracing it.

If that’s what one needs.

The key point is recognizing that our religious, spiritual, intellectual, mathematical experience COMES FROM WITHIN US, the biological being.

It is not a “truth” bestowed from on high.

Understand that this is little me, with my finite brain, limited by my learning and living, whatever it turned out to be. Still, my body is my tool for making sense of the things out there. The reality that just is, Physical Reality, after all, humanity is just the final few seconds in Earth’s 24hr. timeline.

Too many don’t appreciate how much this Earth and her creatures have to teach us. Too many hide behind religion and physical philosophy/math, same different to my mind. And it’s all so obsessively ego-centric. Thus we find ourselves destroying this beautiful biosphere, along with our children’s future. How did so many miss that??? They just didn’t care? Too busy dreaming of flying to Mars or becoming a celeb, or imagining the ultimate truth be it magic or math about the earliest moment in the universe and beyond.

 

Sorry about the derision, but escapism is escapism. I’ve loved learning about all that to, but what happened to the pragmatic real world thinking? We’re destroying our planet’s biosphere, and there’s been nothing but derision, in spirit and action, towards that biosphere’s reality. Evolution has so much important stuff to teach us about everything that really matters like climate and landscapes and biosphere and ocean, etc. But, nothing but dismissal, derision, disregard for “mother” Earth. Which is where my allegiance is.

 

I’ll keep saying it, because it’s a key to better appreciating ourselves and the mess we’ve created. I figure some will get it, with time.

Appreciating the divide between our Human Mindscape ~ Physical Reality

 

==============================================================

 

Huge Price: The question is whether these features are actual realities of the physical world or artificial constructs of human mentality.
Seems to me the very definition of this getting lost within one's own mindscape, that I write of. ?

I’m not even knocking it, just appreciate it for what it is. Personally, I’d much rather talk Solms, Damasio, or now Tim White, listening to Pattison’s ‘Fossil Man’ - fun stuff.

Cheers and thanks for the conversation, hope you don’t mind me returning the volley.

Hmm… seems my last post fell into a black hole?
Sometimes you can use the page back arrow, and it may actually already be there.

OR

It seems that when you edit a post in a hurry it locks the program but stores it in your profile.

It should be in your profile page. You can copy and paste it as a repost and it should show up. Good luck.

 

CCv3; WHERE HAVE I EVER INVOKED MOTIVATED SUPERNATURAL BEINGS ?
I agree with all of what you say. And I never accused you of invoking supernatural beings. Perhaps Both of us were geting subjectively involved rather than a objective dispassionate discussion of facts and conjectures.
Cue, Sabine Hossenfelder, a real physicist.
I also like Sabine Hossenfelder, but I believe she misinterpreted Plato's posit of ideal mathematical patterns, which exist as mathematical abstractions, and which seem to appear over and over again, not in perfect form but as approximations in a dynamic (not static) universe.

That’s the point I was trying to make citing the Fibonacci Sequence. It almost never is expressed in pure mathematical perfection due to the dynamic nature of all environments, but somehow always manage to find successful approximations. There are no perfect circles or squares, but natural selection gets it as close as possible. Bohm called them the (mathematical) “guiding equations” inherent in the spacetime fabric.

You and I have different priorities. I seek philosophical understanding of how it works, where you seek practical correction of the things we managed to screw up using the same natural mathematical tools that made it work in the first place.

I wish “mrmhead” could participate. I’d like to hear his take on things. I think this has been and can still be a productive exchange…

 

 

@write4u

Thank you! I did try the Back thing, but that didn’t work.

However, it was in my Profile!

Thank You!!

 

Firstly, all that I can say about PART 3 of our first video is that the described-there mechanical phenomenon has been proved experimentally many (may be thousands of) times. The “X effect” exists no matter how small/big is the value of the force of friction inside the zig-zag channels. The “X effect” does not depend on the value of force of friction inside the zigzag channels. (Please refer to our previous posts, if you like.)
@will34ab

OK- (maybe) something just clicked for me.

So you’re saying the “X effect” is that the balls accelerate the black apparatus the same such that they come out of the end at the same velocity?

If you extend the experiment and and (n) number of zigzags, the whole apparatus will accelerate until the relative motion between the ball and the tube is Zero.

So that would imply that the length of the zigzag is important because the velocity (ball relative to tube) is in fact not constant, but it is transferring it’s momentum to the black tubes with each change of direction. … and if it’s a 3-dimentional spiral, it would be a constant deceleration – so to speak.

I also like Sabine Hossenfelder, but I believe she misinterpreted Plato’s posit of ideal mathematical patterns,
How's that?

I agree, mrmhead’s input would be nice, and probably constructive, to hear from. Though your’s are pretty good too, and always worth chewing on, even if we disagree.

<hr />

You and I have different priorities. I seek philosophical understanding of how it works,
Hmmm. Yeah, but the thing is I've come to appreciate the philosophical obsession as another example of human's religious journey, since it has more in common with the longing for some perfection of God (or math) in the Heavens - than scientific study, based on observation and measurements.
where you seek practical correction of the things we managed to screw up using the same natural mathematical tools that made it work in the first place.
I can't agree with that. Actually not even sure I understand what you are implying.

What I do know is that what I’ve been doing is very much rooted in my own life long philosophical journey to understand how I fit into this creation. To understand how scientific facts and understanding, fit in with this intellectual journey I’ve been on at least since my mother pointed out to this toddler, that perhaps God was only a speck of dust that wanted to be more.

I’ve found a way that seamlessly weaves physical reality with this mindscape I’ve existed within all my life, and this body that is a product of a long line of Evolution. It does not need supernatural thinking, nor unprovable philosophical assertions, it boils down to a simple recognition of what is.

What I’ve found are useful (yes philosophical) answers that can directly relate to our day to days, whereas I see this obsessive seeking and speculating about finding some universal ultimate answer, that can never be measured, observed, nor proven, or disproven, as a chimera. Not that it doesn’t have its value, but it’s mind candy. More akin to our religious interiors, then any reflection of the actual reality we must navigate daily.

I know that only pisses people off, which I actually would rather not do, but it is what it is.

I wish “mrmhead” could participate. I’d like to hear his take on things. - write4u
Thanks for the consideration. I am trying to keep up, I just haven't had time (haha) to construct a detailed response.

 

I threw something out there, that may have been missed, though I do see it was briefly touched on later:

Causation - Every event is caused by a “previous” event. Which implies an order of events, a separation of events, which implies what humans call “Time”. Then we devolve into “First Event” vs Eternity and all that fun speculation.

<hr />

Time as a dimension: What is the difference between:

our “Present” point in Time, with future in one direction and past in another

and

Our “Current” position on an “x-axis” with “stuff” in front of us and “stuff” behind us?

We are able to move in our 3-dimensions such that we can return to a particular x,y,z coordinate. We just can’t move that way through time … (yet?) Or, in another read about a 4th dimension (not time) someone says “we just can’t look in that direction”


Each order of dimension - 1, 2, 3, etc … in essence sits on top of another, in order to bring order and define that “space”. So if Time is another dimension, what exists beyond Time, x, y and z ? … kind of like asking “what does the universe exist in” I guess what might be called a “reference”

<hr />

As far as I know, math works both ways for time - forwards and backwards. It is only our “reality” that is stuck in Forward

__

Yes, Math is an abstract representation of reality. I liked that video about 4/3.

Patterns and predictability = math. How would we ever get anything done if one time we let go of an apple and it went down. The next time it went up, and a 3rd time it went sideways? So math/patterns/predictability (causation / cause-effect) is inherent to any physical existence.

 

…just a quick, Sunday Morning download … ?

I hope it makes some sense.