Morgan already did the critique. You respond? No. Part of critical thinking is examining the source.
1 Like
Concussed liberal cant think for himself. Thinks platitudes are meaningful responses
Sometimes I really wish this site had laughing response icons
So do i !!!
Or crying ones !!!
A bankrupt Europe is not in a great position to be a military might. You did not articulate what was false in the article. Perhaps on purpose to avoid scrutiny. You cant be a democracy and human rights hub when elections from west to east europe are manipulated to get the “right” outcome. And when you support israel with its blood thirsty massacre and help deliver a head chopping Al -Qaeda jihadist to become the next syrian leader and then proceed to welcome this terrorist with a standing ovation in your parilament we see as garbage when you keep repeating europe is leading the way to a better world.
Your link to an opinion peace insipid in nature and condescending by design highlights the very point made in the RT article that european elites cannot deal with being thrown into the dustbin on irrelevancy and still thinks it can tell china and russia what is best for them.
And on std of this RT article compared to what the west spits out. Compare the wiki post .
Completely one-sided, Russia Bad, Putin Bad, ‘full scale invasion’, no serious discussion of western meddling & provocations, dismissal of n@zism in ukraine, dismissal of atrocities committed against ethnic Russians, no discussion of Ukrainian build-up of military forces against the Donbas in the immediate run-up to the SMO, a section dedicated to ‘Russian propaganda and disinformation campaigns’ but none on the rampant outpouring of bullsh!t coming from the other side, etc etc… Shows that wiki is worthless for understanding modern-day politics which the power interests have a stake in.