347997
We don’t need you to spew out what is already known and not in dispute
SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS!!
SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS!!Yeah. That's what every CFI post should be.
SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS!!3 examples of different types of solutions:
Seltzer water
Alcohol
Tea
Okay to recap Mike’s crap, I mean his lies.
He wants to blame Earth’s current extreme warming on the sun. Yet as the links I shared make clear, the sun hasn’t been increasing its energetic insolation of Earth since the '50s. Please note he’s never produced any evidence supporting his slipshod claims.
The clouds, although they’re a bit more of an uncertainty wild card of sorts, this too is proving itself not to be such a wild card after all.
Clouds study finds that low climate sensitivity is ‘extremely unlikely’. (Now the consensus figure is inching up past three degrees C, at 3.2)Posted on 30 July 2021 by Guest Author Ayesha Tandon
This is a re-post from Carbon Brief by Ayesha TandonIt is “very likely” that the way clouds change as the world warms will drive further temperature rise, a new study finds.
The response of clouds to a change in global temperature – known as the “cloud feedback” – plays a crucial role in how much the planet will warm. However, estimates of cloud feedback are uncertain. The new study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, uses global satellite observations to reduce this uncertainty.
Taking their findings into account, the authors produce a central estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) – the global temperature change resulting from a doubling of atmospheric CO2 – of 3.2C.
They add that low ECS values below 2C are “extremely unlikely”.
While much of the existing literature on cloud feedbacks focuses on specific cloud types or geographic regions, this paper presents the first global observational estimate of cloud feedback, the authors say.
A scientist not involved in the research tells Carbon Brief that “this is a really clever study”, adding that it is “the best one I have seen that combines models and observations to narrow down cloud feedbacks”.
Equilibrium climate sensitivity … (more explanations for those interested in actually learning something - check it out https://skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=5144)
Although I think the entire Climate Sensitively Study thing is a scientific nerds field and that it doesn’t belong in a public discussion because we have no clue of the true impact of 2°C and we are seeing that 1°C is bringing changes way beyond what serious scientists dared dream a couple decades back. We simply don’t know enough to appreciate how bad the upheaval and disruption and destruction coming our way is going to be. But we sure as hell know from the past half century that it is going to massive and that our society is not prepared to deal with any of it.
But the masses won’t start believing that until the fire hoses runs dry, and their air conditioners stop running because the electricity turbines melt down due to lack of cooling water, while the farms are watching their fields dry and wither. So tragic, so self inflicted.
But the masses won’t start believing that until the fire hoses runs dry, and their air conditioners stop running because the electricity turbines melt down due to lack of cooling water, while the farms are watching their fields dry and wither. So tragic, so self inflicted.And that's when the zombies start roaming the countryside. This will become an existential crisis, mark my words.
We are in the middle of the 6th extinction event and the effects are beginning to show, but we are not nearly at the end yet. It’s going to get much worse.
As George Carlin said about the notion of saving the earth; “the earth isn’t going anywhere, we are”.
If this sounds inconceivable, in the scope of global events it is a minor adjustment. If the earth sees us as a surface nuisance, it will shed us like a dog sheds water. …flflflfllflflfllfl…
And some thought 2012 was going to be bad. ?
348219
We don’t want large cut and paste slabs of stuff that is not in dispute and repeated ad nausium.
SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS PLEASE!!
Tex, why you being so neurotic? We don’t have solutions. Do you? Then share some! If you have nothing to share, then what are you yodeling about?
You remind me of clients with no clue about carpentry but expecting utterly impossible stuff - I knew contractor who liked the line, “I’m a carpenter, not a magician.” Around here we’re simple citizens talking about the world that’s happening around us and that doesn’t give a fart what we think. We’re doing the best we can with what we got.
You can be a jerk ad nausium, if you want, but what’s that get you?
Those cut 'n paste slabs relate to real science and are part of educating yourself about this climate engine that controls our lives. Ridiculing that sharing of information is pathetic and says way more about your lack of substance, then me or what I’m sharing.
348255
I did and then I asked you to enter the conversation. No luck thus far. Just repeating goobledygook
I did -- @djtexasI can't tell what you are responding to. As much as you cut and paste, it seems like you could master copying text from a post, pasting it into yours, then clicking the gigantic quote marks in the edit icons.
Not sure it would help your repetitive baiting harassment, but it would be more clear what you are harassing.
See the number i referenced? Usually a response follows on from the previous post. That’s how it generally flows FYI. It would pay to read that if you are so concerned.
#348257
Tex, why do you say science is gobbledygook. Can you explain?
That last comment reminds me of something I keep wondering about you: Does gratuitously insulting others, give you a feeling of superiority? … or is it just a tingle in yo belly, you’re after?
See the number i referenced?Yep. And none of the questions in that post go with your answer in any logical way
348289
It does. Regarding to providing solutions
348257
Just engage and respond in kind with what is being said to you.
Just engage and respond in kind with what is being said to you.If the answer was to "do you", meaning, "do you have solutions". I haven't heard them from you, so, nothing to engage.
348322
Go through the thread if it concerns you so much
#348257
Tex, why do you say science is gobbledygook. Can you explain?
Climate change includes both global warming driven by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases and the resulting large-scale shifts in weather patterns. https://www.couponupto.com/coupons/rosemira