An alternative to the "big bang", “black hole", “ideal gas"

An alternative to the “big bang”, “black hole", “ideal gas"

In the 1973 the Universe was in the condition T=2,7K. ( Nobel prize )
Today in the 2014 this condition is a little less than T=2,7K
and " tomorrow" this condition will be T=0K.
Therefore I will say:
It was, is, it will be forever an infinite, eternal, absolute reference frame T=0K.
On this infinite scene there are located gravity systems
on which human tries to understand the reality.

In the T=0K exists some kind of “virtual” negative imaginary particles.
These imaginary quantum particles are as real particles as positive Newtonian ones.

Kirchhoff’s black body - light go in and don’t come back.
Black holes - light go in and don’t come back.
Zero Vacuum - light go in and don’t come back.

Black - holes have temperature about absolute zero
(60 nanokelvin - 60 billionths of a kelvin).
" Ideal Gas" has temperature T=0K.
The Cosmos as whole has temperature T=0K.

My conclusion.
Kirchhoff’s black body, black holes , “ideal gas” are models of zero vacuum.
All laws of an “ideal gas” and “quantum theory” can be used
to explain the initial / primary conditions of the Existance.
It seems that in the future heat death of the universe can come.
(according to the logic of big bang )
But thanks to Planck’s and Hawking radiations
( vacuum fluctuation, tunneling barrier )
the Universe can escape heat death.
All the best
Israel Sadovnik Socratus

Black holes mathematically impossible: Study
/ Sep 29, 2014 /
However, in her new work, Mersini-Houghton showed that
by giving off this radiation, the star also sheds mass.
So much so that as it shrinks it no longer has the density
to become a black hole.
Before a black hole can form, the dying star swells one last time and then explodes.
A singularity never forms and neither does an event horizon.
The take home message of the work is clear:
there is no such thing as a black hole, researchers said.

Wait, if that’s the case, then how’d they film this:

Or this: The Centre of a Galaxy “Supermassive Black Hole in the Heart of Our Galaxy]”

How about this?
From this article in Nature here]

Most physicists foolhardy enough to write a paper claiming that “there are no black holes" — at least not in the sense we usually imagine — would probably be dismissed as cranks. But when the call to redefine these cosmic crunchers comes from Stephen Hawking, it’s worth taking notice. In a paper posted online, the physicist, based at the University of Cambridge, UK, and one of the creators of modern black-hole theory, does away with the notion of an event horizon, the invisible boundary thought to shroud every black hole, beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape.
"Grey holes" instead of black holes?
In its stead, Hawking’s radical proposal is a much more benign “apparent horizon", which only temporarily holds matter and energy prisoner before eventually releasing them, albeit in a more garbled form.

I all sounds a lot like the old I=BS theory.