Your Verdict on Bio Dark-matter Chemistry & Your Invisible non-Entropic Doppelganger" Secular or Sacred?

Religion and Secularism
1

Bio dark-matter chemistry, not antimatter antics, offers the best explanation most if not for all of the reliably reported anomalous phenomena . It has logical consistency, biological inevitability and psychological/psychiatric necessity.
What would be your verdict on this scientific piece? Secular? Sacred? Ordinary Materialism? Or Materialism extraordinaire? Useful to arouse curiosity?
Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit ?
Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry & Your Invisible Enduring Doppelganger
A February 2013. ISBN: 978-1-62006-182-4; Kindle: 978-1-62006-183-1e
Synopsis
Where matter exists chemistry exists. Dark-matter is no exception. Ordinary matter has ordinary chemistry yielding you an ordinary visible body. Extraordinary dark-matter has extraordinary chemistry yielding you an extraordinary invisible body. It is a biological inevitability, psychological/psychiatric necessity, has logical consistency and published in different scientific journals.
A durable (non-entropic) and invisible doppelganger identical to the visible entropic body (and coupled to it) is formed from the moment of conception. This body being non-electric can easily pass through any barrier- walls and doors- made of ordinary matter. That is materialism extraordinaire supplementing ordinary materialism which by itself is obviously inadequate to explain human existence from the microhuman zygote to the fully grown adult where the undying information is a constant. There will be no experimental dark-matter chemistry laboratory, only ab initio computational chemistries, ultra-weak biophoton emission rates, perhaps detection/separation of monopoles in all live matter and investigations into “magnetricity”. All chemistry (chemical bond) is essentially a spin phenomenon. The rules of chemistry will be the same in both “light” and “dark” matter. Distribution of these dark-particles need not be the same in all species which seems to support the large taxonomic dependence of biophoton emission rates. These ultra-weak photons (<1 per cell per second in humans and 10 in plants) may result from the interactions of “light-matter” and “dark-matter” chemical bonds. “Bio Dark-matter” need not be the same as astrophysical dark-matter.
No science including the most successful theories such as quantum mechanics is perfect or complete, thus affirming the finiteness and limitation of all human knowledge. The least perfect of all sciences are the biosciences, since what makes dead matter “bio” is the least known. It becomes all the more difficult, if not impossible, when about 95% of the universe is unknown as “dark-matter and dark energy”. Confining this dark side to astrophysics and galaxies alone to the exclusion of biophysics and the biosphere is unwarranted, especially in view of the inexplicable origin of the ultra-weak biophotons, as well as its taxonomic dependence of their emission rates/sq.cm/s by an order magnitude.
When de-coupled (i.e. when spin-spin couplings fail) dark matter bodies are left at a relatively negative energy state (-E = mC^2) where m = body mass. They may be energized to visible states by an external source with a minimum threshold of E = mC^2. [Distinctions of race, color and gender are not possible here. These bodies are non-entropic (enduring) such that procreativity is necessarily absent here. Instead, creativity is maximized, including perhaps creating lower forms of life- one’s own pet animal and/or plant!!]. Discuss or disprove or discard!
Listen to your twin! Non-entropic and nonelectric. Enduring and renewable.
Best regards
Philip Benjamin
PhD MSc MA

References
1. "Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit? Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry &amp; Your Invisible Doppelganger". Sunbury Press, PA. February 2013. ISBN: 978-1-62006-182-4
2. Philip Benjamin "Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry", International Journal of Current Research and Reviews Vol 4 issue 20, 2012.
3. Dark Chemistry &amp; the Paranormal, WorldComp'10 Proceedings of the
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol II,pp 633-39, July 12-15, 2010, CSREA Press, Las Vegas, NV. (Presented orally also
on July 15 at 10 a.m).
4 DARK CHEMISTRY &amp; PARANORMAL PHENOMENA, International Journal of Applied Science &amp;
Computations, Vol. 17, No. 1 Pages 16 to 36, June 2010
5. Dark Matter &amp; Dark Chemistry NeuroQuantology September 2007, Vol 5 # 3,322-326.
6. Dark Chemistry or Psychic Spin Pixel? NeuroQuantology, June 2007, Vol. 5 # 2, 197-204.
7. Mind Matter, Noetic Journal Vol 4 # 4, 351-360, 2003[Nobelist Sir John Eccles Centennial Edition].
8. http://biodarkmatter.webs.com/index.htm -
9. Philip Benjamin http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind9807&amp;L=quantum-mind
10. http://physics.about.com/b/2009/09/15/could-dark-photons-dark-atoms-exist.htm
Philip P. Benjamin
PhD Msc MA
Evidence for human exceptionalism- "humaniqueness" ?
"Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit? Your Invisible Doppelganger". Sunbury Press Feb 2013 ISBN: 978-1-62006-182-4 Mobipocket format (Kindle) ISBN: 978-1-62006-183-1e Pub format (Nook) ISBN: 978-1-62006-184-8 2012
There are many recent papers on neutrinos as monopoles and on how to modify Maxwell's equations to accommodate monopoles. The masses of these particles entering into dark chemistries and "dark" human bodies (of negligible mass) will be in the same ratios as the masses of the fermions in corresponding ordinary atoms. Magnetic polarities will not be any different than electric polarities with respect to chemical bond formations.
</span>
2

As a retired chemist I don’t have the vaguest idea what you are talking about, and I doubt that anyone here would have viable opinions on the subject. My only comment is that I don’t believe any of what you listed has the slightest relationship to the mythology of religion, spirituality, or the paranormal. Assuming that the credentials you list are valid, then you must have missed the concept of acceptance of the presently unknown without trying to tack on silly fairytale explanations.
Occam

3
Where matter exists chemistry exists. Dark-matter is no exception.
This is blatantly wrong. Dark-matter is supposed to interact via gravity only. This force is far too weak to create any small scale stable structure. All the rest of your posting is just more misunderstandings about modern science and empty speculations about phenomena that do not exist. You are just fantasising your theories together.
4
As a retired chemist I don't have the vaguest idea what you are talking about, and I doubt that anyone here would have viable opinions on the subject. My only comment is that I don't believe any of what you listed has the slightest relationship to the mythology of religion, spirituality, or the paranormal. Assuming that the credentials you list are valid, then you must have missed the concept of acceptance of the presently unknown without trying to tack on silly fairytale explanations. Occam
[Noetics] 1. What SPECIFIC objections have you got as a chemist (retd.)? 2. Is it on biophotons? They do not exist? 3. Is it on different biophoton emission rates across the taxa? Do you have an explanation? 4. Is it on bio dark-matter? Bio dark-matter need not be, but could be the same as astrophysical dark-matter (since none has as yet defined precisely what dark-matter consists of, though axions and neutrinos also have been speculated). 5. Is it on monopoles? You deny their existence? On what grounds? 6. Is Bio dark-matter chemistry more or no less viable than the well published SUSY chemistry? 7. What is chemistry? Why should there be chemistry at all? Why or how should anybody have any BODY at all? What exactly is your objection? I have received hundreds of letters and thousands of opinions over a period of two decades from many who are engaged in this field of study, but this is the one and only summary rejection without any point by point rebuttal. Either you have information that none else has or you have not read carefully the synopsis or any of the peer reviewed references or the book itself. Best regards Noetics
5
Where matter exists chemistry exists. Dark-matter is no exception.
This is blatantly wrong. Dark-matter is supposed to interact via gravity only. This force is far too weak to create any small scale stable structure. All the rest of your posting is just more misunderstandings about modern science and empty speculations about phenomena that do not exist. You are just fantasising your theories together. [Noetics] I can only repeat what has been already posted above. I seldom engage in or deal with pontifications in science. If your objections are not specific, only a blanket rejection, there is nothing much I can help you with. Probably you have not gone through any of the peer reviewed references or the book itself. Scare-crow tactics are not good for any scientific or philosophic inquiry. Best regards Noetics
6

Does “dark matter” actually exist? This isn’t my field but apparently there is some controversy.

7
Does "dark matter" actually exist? This isn't my field but apparently there is some controversy. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21583972-three-experiments-are-starting-study-dark-energy-most-abundant-stuff
\ Engage in enough discussion groups and you will learn that dark matter does indeed exist in large amounts. ;)
8
Does "dark matter" actually exist? This isn't my field but apparently there is some controversy. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21583972-three-experiments-are-starting-study-dark-energy-most-abundant-stuff
[Noetics] Dark matter is not an "imagination". It is "measured" and thus observed ever since the Swiss Astronomer Fritz Zwicky The (1933) explored the motions of distant and massive clusters of galaxies, specifically the Coma cluster and the Virgo cluster. Zwicky estimated the mass of each galaxy in the cluster from their luminosity, and added up all of the galaxy masses to get a total cluster mass. He made another independent estimate of the same mass, from the spread in velocities of the individual galaxies in the cluster. The latter dynamical mass was 400 times larger than the former. The rotational curves of Spiral Galaxies also requires the dark matter. Kepler's 3rd Law applies to stars near the perimeter of a Spiral Galaxy. The mass enclosed by the orbit is assumed to be constant there. However, astronomers have determined that none of the orbital speeds of stars in the outer parts of a large number of spiral galaxies follow Kepler's 3rd Law. Instead of falling off at larger radii, the orbital speeds remain mysteriously constant, implying that the mass enclosed by larger-radius orbits increases, even for stars that are actually near the edge of the galaxy. Thus the galaxy mass profile continues well beyond the regions occupied by these stars. About 95% of the universe is unknown as "dark-matter and dark energy". Confining this dark side to astrophysics and galaxies alone to the exclusion of biophysics and the biosphere is unwarranted, especially in view of the inexplicable origin of the ultra-weak biophotons, as well as its taxonomic dependence of their emission rates/sq.cm/s by an order magnitude.Assuming that the biosphere has no part with dark-matter is far- fetched. Call it by any name you want to, a dark-matter doppelganger symmetric to the visible (light matter) body is not only a logical necessity but a biological inevitability. Just consider these propositions for the biosphere and forget all about the distant galaxies: 1. Bio Dark-matter exists 2. Evidence for monopoles exist 3. Bio Dark-matter chemistry (dark chemical bond) exists, chemistry being essentially a spin phenomenon. 4. Live human cells emit about 1 photon/sq.cm/s and plant cells 10 photons/sq.cm/s 5. dead cells do not emit these biophotons ("bursts" of biophotons at the moment of cell death have been reported).
9
Does "dark matter" actually exist? This isn't my field but apparently there is some controversy. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21583972-three-experiments-are-starting-study-dark-energy-most-abundant-stuff
\ Engage in enough discussion groups and you will learn that dark matter does indeed exist in large amounts. ;) [Noetics] Recently there were some miscalculations in this field and "dark-matter" was reported "missing" (non-existent). Those calculations were re-examined, the mistakes were clearly delineated and corrected restoring the real "missing matter" of the universe. Bio dark-matter stands on its own. It may or may not be the same as astrophysical dark-matter. [The experimentally observed neutrinos and the theoretically determined axions have been also considered as candidates for astrophysical dark-matter which together with the monopoles are the likely candidates for bio dark-matter also] Noetics
10

My vote is “None Of The Above.”
Please be so kind as to stop wasting our time with your nonsense.

11
I can only repeat what has been already posted above.
Don't. Just give up. Nobody here is interested.
12
Does "dark matter" actually exist? This isn't my field but apparently there is some controversy. http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21583972-three-experiments-are-starting-study-dark-energy-most-abundant-stuff
\ Engage in enough discussion groups and you will learn that dark matter does indeed exist in large amounts. ;) [Noetics] Recently there were some miscalculations in this field and "dark-matter" was reported "missing" (non-existent). Those calculations were re-examined, the mistakes were clearly delineated and corrected restoring the real "missing matter" of the universe. Bio dark-matter stands on its own. It may or may not be the same as astrophysical dark-matter. [The experimentally observed neutrinos and the theoretically determined axions have been also considered as candidates for astrophysical dark-matter which together with the monopoles are the likely candidates for bio dark-matter also] Noetics [Noetics] There are two kinds of idiocy in the world: 1. Willful and 2. Willing. The willful one generates fear, closed-mind, irrationality, intolerance, ignorance, uselessness and is un-teachable. It has no audience outside forums such as these where its adherents can IMAGINE to exercise Marxist-like authoritarianism. The willing one has cheer, open-mind, inquisitiveness, tolerance, usefulness and is teachable! It respects authoritativeness, not authoritarianism. Bio dark-matter chemistry is a propositional statement with evidence. What kind of "idiocy" will not be open to that? Willful? Willing? There are two kinds of wisdom in the world: 1. Enlightened. 2. Darkened. While the former governs knowledge, knowledge dictates the latter. One is from above and the other from beneath. One separates wisdom from knowledge, the other does not. Biospherical dark-matter stands on its own. It need not be the same as astrophysical dark-matter, though could be such as neutrinos, monopoles and axions. Noetics
13
There are two kinds of idiocy in the world:
You weren't doing too bad until you started trying to shame people into accepting your crack-pot theory. An important part of science is how you accept criticism. Of course you haven't presented much evidence, so there isn't much to respond to here. I give you a 350 on the crackpot index. The CFI spam filter is pretty strong, so you have find this site the old fashioned way math.ucr.edu/home /baez/crackpot.html
14
Where matter exists chemistry exists. Dark-matter is no exception.
This is blatantly wrong. Dark-matter is supposed to interact via gravity only. This force is far too weak to create any small scale stable structure. Questions pertinent here will be: 1. What is a chemical bond? 2. What forces other than gravity are operative between two neutral atoms, particularly between two INERT NOBLE ATOMS (Xe and Xe to yield Xe2+? etc.) 3. Likewise between AR2+, Kr2+, Xe2+, KrN2+ or in xenon hexafluoroplatinate (XePtF6), 4. What forces other than gravity operate between neutrinos for neutrino atoms and neutrino molecules to exist as theorized by Nikolai Nijegorodov (2008). See below in red. Formula: Xe2+ Molecular weight: 262.585 Dehmer, P.M.; Dehmer, J.L., Photoelectron spectrum of the Xe2 van der Waals molecule, J. Chem. Phys., 1977, 67, 1774. Miller, T.M.; Ling, J.H.; Saxon, R.P.; Moseley, J.T., Absolute total cross sections for the photodissociation of AR2+, Kr2+, Xe2+, KrN2+, and KrN+ from 565 to 695 nm, Phys. Rev. A: Gen. Phys., 1976, 13, 2171-2177. Lee, Hye-Sung, Liu Z, Soni, A. Neutrino dark matter candidate in 4th generation scenarios. Phys. Lett. 2011; B704: 30-35. 23. Nijegorodov N. "On Physical Interactions & the World of God". 2008; www.ub.bw/news.cfm?t=905 8-5-12 There are many candidates suggested for dark matter such as axions, (Duffy et al, 2009, Erken et al, 2012), neutrinos (Davis et al, 1985, Lee et al, 2011) and monopoles (Gomez-Sanchez et al, 2011). Physicist Professor Nikolai Nijegorodov (2008) states: "in the nearest future physicists would prove, first theoretically and then experimentally that neutrino atom and neutrino molecules do exist. That would be enough evidence that life in the world of neutrino does exist". Okulov's (1981) neutrino model with magnetic charge (a point source of magnetic field analogous to the electric charge, e) predicts a non-zero mass. Fermionic axions have been theoretically shown to exist (Hooper and Wang, 2004). Gravitons may behave as charged particles with negative and positive color charges as well as magnetic color (H. Javadia et al, 2009). Malkus (1951) determined that the binding energies of monopoles to matter are close to those of chemical bonds, that the Dirac magnetic monopoles interact with matter and could be separated by strong magnetic fields. If dark-matter is confined to the galaxies only and if it has no chemistry, it is of no routine use for the biosphere. [Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit ? Bio Dark-Matter Chemistry & Your Invisible Enduring Doppelganger A February 2013. ISBN: 978-1-62006-182-4; Kindle: 978-1-62006-183-1e ]
15
40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.) If you have a theory, then you have something that is testable, something that potentially answers questions. If you have a bunch of questions, then that's all you have. You are saying, "I don't know, therefore non-Entropic Doppleganger"
16
40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.) If you have a theory, then you have something that is testable, something that potentially answers questions. If you have a bunch of questions, then that's all you have. You are saying, "I don't know, therefore non-Entropic Doppleganger"
[Noetics] Would you explain the origin of biophotons and the difference by an order of magnitude in its emission rates across the taxa? If you have read any of the references you will find that another testability will be pulling out monopoles from live cells ( in a petr-idish). An experimental design also was presented. One of the European letters indicated they are working on it. Noetics
17
40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.) If you have a theory, then you have something that is testable, something that potentially answers questions. If you have a bunch of questions, then that's all you have. You are saying, "I don't know, therefore non-Entropic Doppleganger"
[Noetics] Would you explain the origin of biophotons and the difference by an order of magnitude in its emission rates across the taxa? If you have read any of the references you will find that another testability will be pulling out monopoles from live cells ( in a petr-idish). An experimental design also was presented. One of the European letters indicated they are working on it. Noetics No. When I went to biology class in college, the professor didn't stand in front of the class and challenge us to explain things. The key words here are "they are working on it". How does this affect me if I am not aware of it? Why do you care what I think about it?
18
40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.) If you have a theory, then you have something that is testable, something that potentially answers questions. If you have a bunch of questions, then that's all you have. You are saying, "I don't know, therefore non-Entropic Doppleganger"
[Noetics] Would you explain the origin of biophotons and the difference by an order of magnitude in its emission rates across the taxa? If you have read any of the references you will find that another testability will be pulling out monopoles from live cells ( in a petr-idish). An experimental design also was presented. One of the European letters indicated they are working on it. Noetics No. When I went to biology class in college, the professor didn't stand in front of the class and challenge us to explain things. The key words here are "they are working on it". How does this affect me if I am not aware of it? Why do you care what I think about it? [Noetics] Sorry, for the mistaken identity. Biology will not help a great deal here; physics, chemistry, philosophy/logic will. It is a physicist/engineer who is trying to pull out monopoles from live cells. Regret bothering you. Noetics.
19
No. When I went to biology class in college, the professor didn't stand in front of the class and challenge us to explain things. The key words here are "they are working on it". How does this affect me if I am not aware of it? Why do you care what I think about it?
[Noetics] Sorry, for the mistaken identity. Biology will not help a great deal here; physics, chemistry, philosophy/logic will. It is a physicist/engineer who is trying to pull out monopoles from live cells. Regret bothering you. Noetics. Allow me to correct: No. When I went to biology, physics or chemistry class in college, the professor didn't stand in front of the class and challenge us to explain things. The key words here are "they are working on it". How does this affect me if I am not aware of it? Why do you care what I think about it? Philosophy of course is a completely different animal. I would expect to be challenged with questions in a philosophy class. So, how does this affect me if I am not aware of it? and Why do you care what I think about it?
20
No. When I went to biology class in college, the professor didn't stand in front of the class and challenge us to explain things. The key words here are "they are working on it". How does this affect me if I am not aware of it? Why do you care what I think about it?
[Noetics] Sorry, for the mistaken identity. Biology will not help a great deal here; physics, chemistry, philosophy/logic will. It is a physicist/engineer who is trying to pull out monopoles from live cells. Regret bothering you. Noetics. Allow me to correct: No. When I went to biology, physics or chemistry class in college, the professor didn't stand in front of the class and challenge us to explain things. The key words here are "they are working on it". How does this affect me if I am not aware of it? Why do you care what I think about it? Philosophy of course is a completely different animal. I would expect to be challenged with questions in a philosophy class. So, how does this affect me if I am not aware of it? and Why do you care what I think about it? [Noetics] Normally I do not get into "individual needs & problems", especially when I know nothing about the individual. Coupling & decoupling (spin-spin) discussed in the references may be of interest to you. Prospect of being raised to a functional level after "decoupling" by an external energy source is another item of curiosity. "Entanglement" with the lost fermions may be an interesting possibility. Passage of a non-electric doppelganger raised to the minimum threshold of energy (E=mC^2) through any and every material barriers may be worth exploring. Elucidation of many reliably reported anomalous phenomena such as NDE/OBE etc. may be illuminating.