I lost the post about this. I explain more when I have time.
Please take this to this thread
I thought this deserved its own thread. Probably could use some clarification. Like, who is “we”. Or, does matter NEED to explain itself at all? slight_smile Then why are we defending the concept of a God as a productive endeavor? > When we start looking at the fundamentals of physical patterns, the constituent part become smaller, less physically solid, and less organic (simpler) in constituent parts.
W4U said: A hydrogen molecule (H2O) is one of the simplest value patterns and is the result of self-organizing patterns by two of the earliest physical elements emerging after the BB.
The strange dilemma lies in the scientific evasion that religion isn’t science, but is tolerated and given its own sub-forum just because there are a lot of “believers”, whereas anyone who proposes a perfectly sound argument for universal mathematics gets slammed for being pseudo-science that must be rejected at all cost.
Tegmark has been called a charlatan, while some priest is treated with the greatest deference. I find that odd juxtaposition very strange.