And upon what is this foundation of “Mathematics of the Universe” based? Not energy, gravity time, space, or conciousness since these things are expressions of the potential that mathematics represents.
Our ideas and implementations of what we call mathematics are not the thing itself. That being the “Moon” that I’ve been pointing at this entire time!
I have not forgotten anything…you just keep insisting that I’m miles behind you about this.
Exactly! And ultimately immeasurability is recognized and acknowledged. Which changes nothing about the journey “The Tao that can be named, being the mother of the ten thousand things”.
What do you mean by “almost all”? (pay attention when that happens! it is a chance to step through the “gateless gate” of immeasurability.)
What I said originally was “it indicates an absence of difference”. That would be in the aggregate patterns being compared.
It is as you say, the human in the equation imagining “value” to be what = actually indicates. Don’t forget the implicit simultaneity of Entirety. That “simultaneity” includes humans applying their mathematical exercises and discovery. All “significant differences in constituent parts” are resolved in the universal version of =. The Tao that cannot be named, or Kaivalya, or Entirety.
Don’t forget the subject being discussed is non-relative infinitude of the absolute context. The ultimate a-priori Truth.
My response to the subject of this forum titled: “Who is ‘God’?” My answer being “There is Only God”. (aka Reality-as-it-actually-is)
Please do not project “intention” onto the term “God” as I’ve used it here!!!