Doug I’m splitting this off from another thread to focus on the physics behind the scientific consensus regarding manmade global warming.
I'm certainly not convinced that science has demonstrated with any certainty that the current (Milankovitch) cycle is any different.Actually there is nothing different about the current cycle. It's the Atmospheric Insulation that's sky rocketing. I don't have the time to do your homework but a couple minutes with Google will reveal scientists have studied the Milankovitch cycle and other 'natural' drivers of Earth's climate to exquisite detail. The claim is they don't have enough ____? Can anyone define what's lacking?
...I'd certainly feel more confident if some scientists and politicians were looking rather more critically at the carbon theory.The implication is that scientists are overlooking stuff. Making such claims, one should be able to support them with a simple list of examples. What stuff are scientists over-looking?