Does that apply to Euler's equation] as well?? Pi isI don't know what it means,nota scientific belief - it is a mathematical identity, just as 1 + 1 =2 is. or are you going to change that too?

**but it sure is pretty]**

Does that apply to Euler's equation] as well?? Pi isI don't know what it means,nota scientific belief - it is a mathematical identity, just as 1 + 1 =2 is. or are you going to change that too?

Pi is math. Pie is physics. :lol:

Measurement does not get the number pi

Measurement provide that ( A1 : A2) > ( O1 : O2)

Page 3 in the article “Physical theory of sophisticated lines”

To prove the theory ,should conduct the experiment described in the drawing.

small sophisticated line that a appears in the drawing belong to a steel cylinder

A1=2mm with internal number 3.14198

Big sophisticated line that appears in the drawing belong to a steel cylinder

A2 = 100 mm with internal number 3.14165

The cylinders are pressed each other ,and when the small cylinder turns , also the big. Cylinder Turns. According to the theory ,if the little cylinder will turns 50 rounds ,

the big cylinder will turn a full circle + 0.033mm ( = 0.0378 degrees )

The 0.033mm , discoverable with a laser beam that reaches further screen.

This discovery of 0.033mm proved the theory

The article…physical theory of sophyisticated lines

http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/pi-day-questionby-aetzbar-69915.html

Yes, there’s nobody at home.

there’s nobody at home.I don't even think the lights are on.

I would like to thank to forum members, about the discussion of variable pi.

If accepted scientific institution will conduct the experiment I suggested ,he will get the result …………………. ( A1 : A2) > ( O1 : O2)

This result is a revolution in geometry , physics , and math.

Duplicate of post below, therefore deleted (again :red: )

The experiment did not measure diameter and circumference for calculation pi

The experiment measures the ratio of turnes ( of tow cylinders) when their diameters ratio is already known

Little steel cylinder of 2 mm diameter ,pressed to big steel cylinder of 100 mm diameter.

If pi fixed, after 50 turns of little cylinder, the big cylinder turn 360 degrees

but pi is not fixed

The device is very successful and only needs to improve the laser beam ( to tiny dot)

The device is very successful and only needs to improve the laser beam ( to tiny dot)Yes, but to what precision were you able to make it? In other words what are the likely errors of your experiment? Every experiment has errors of measurement and it is essential to have a good estimation of them when publishing results to prevent false conclusions being made.

Speaking of publishing results, if the OP were serious he’d send his paper to a peer-reviewed math journal instead of posting on Internet forums.

There is no mistakes.

With focused laser beam ,it is possible to measure angle of 0.001 degree.

The article should send a national laboratory of physics, to perform an experiment.

Journal of Mathematics disqualify the article, according to the conventional mathematics

There is no mistakes. With focused laser beam ,it is possible to measure angle of 0.001 degree.I am not taking about mistakes, I am talking about +/-errors of measurement, often cited with so many sigmas of statistical significance. It is very difficult to make any sense of what you are saying in your paper, you will have to clarify that if you anyone to consider it for publication. You talk about pressing together a 100mm and a 2mm cylinder, to what accuracy are these cylinders manufactured? It is because the larger one is not

Then write it up and send it to a physics journal. You will accomplish nothing posting this on the Internet.

There is no mistakes. With focused laser beam ,it is possible to measure angle of 0.001 degree.I am not taking about mistakes, I am talking about +/-errors of measurement, often cited with so many sigmas of statistical significance. It is very difficult to make any sense of what you are saying in your paper, (the title makes no sense for a start), you will have to clarify that if you anyone (self publication?) to consider it for publication. You talk about pressing together and rotating a 100mm and a 2mm cylinder; to what accuracy are these cylinders manufactured? It is because the larger one is not