The information has already been provided.
You choose to ridicule since you got nothing else going for you.
Besides, it's all same as it ever was, war profiteering has been one of the few growth enterprises these past few decades.
But, the resultant desperate shape of human relations and or refugees and the wide spread misery left in the wake of all these contrived war's and insurrections, goes unseen, unrecognized, on the way to the nice cocktail lounge where the successful people gather, to brag about their toys.
Vast fortunes have been and continue to be made supporting war, if you're supplying both sides then the profits are much greater. The simple fact is that Hitler's rise to power and the rapid rebuilding of the German industrial and military base was only made possible by the same economic system that was then used to "defeat" Nazi Germany. At which point the whole edifice was turned on the Soviet Union with only a show trial to "clean" up the Nazi mess in Europe, to engage an enemy that was also largely made possible by massive investment from the west. Much of the industrial base of the USSR was also funded and built by the US and other western countries. The massive oil and refinery capacity was supported by the west, it's where the Koch fortune originated and the tens of thousands of Soviet tanks, artillery, aircraft and more often came from huge and efficient factories built with western backing and expertise.
We're largely under the control of psychopaths who spend their lives figuring out ways to start new wars so they can make even more billions.
The wars in Iraq that are now leading to so much chaos are no different.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/gulf-war-documents-meeting-between-saddam-hussein-and-ambassador-to-iraq-april-glaspie/31145
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie – What solutions would be acceptable?
Saddam Hussein - If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab – our strategic goal in our war with Iran – we will make concessions (to the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (i.e., in Saddam s view, including Kuwait ) then we will give up all of the Shatt to defend our claims on Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be. (pause) What is the United States’ opinion on this?
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie – We have no opinion on your Arab – Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State James) Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960′s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America. (Saddam smiles)
On August 2, 1990, Saddam massed troops to invade and occupy Kuwait. _____
President George Bush senior basically greenlit an Iraqi invasion of Kuwait to get a very profitable war started there and his son as president fabricated a case to invade and occupy Iraq that was incredibly profitable for anyone linked to the family and the "defense" sector.
And most of this is driven by people closely associated with the Republican Party, whether it’s Prescott Bush who worked closely with Hitler’s financier Fritz Thyssen starting in the early 1920s helping to make WW II happen and who was also the patron of that other Republican president Nixon who secretly widened the war in SE Asia and in the process directly or indirectly is responsible for the deaths of millions of people. Or his son and grandson that have been at the center of aggressive US policy that has also led to the deaths, injury, and homelessness of incredible numbers of people.
It’s hard to quantify the damage this one family has done, much of it working through the agency of the political right in the US. It’s no wonder that Republicans would rather gloss over these things, if held accountable few of them would be listened to and some of them would be and should be incarcerated for life for the benefit of the rest of humanity. Who these “people” seem to look at more as prey items than actual people.