I have a nagging question from my research into the flat earth society. They are actually a fairly scientific bunch, if you simply ignore certain science. For example, there’s a YouTube where a guy who gets in his truck in Australia and drives a flat road. He starts out explaining how to look up the curve of the earth and if you look at it as an actual straight line extending from where you are, the earth “drops” away from that line. So, he theorizes, as he drives, that drop should register on his GPS. I know he just has the wrong instrument, that if he flew in a jet in that actual straight line, with the gyroscopic device that maintains zero altitude from where it left the ground, he would see that “drop”.
But, here’s the question, how does GPS take into account the curvature? Some sort of triangulation I guess, but what basis is it using for sea level? Is each satellite given an altitude, based on its geosynchronous location? I’m not even sure what I would put in google for this one.
I have no idea how they get the earth is flat. They’ve obviously haven’t been to the Ozarks or the Blue Ridge Mountains or even the Rocky Mountains, only to name just a few in the U.S. alone.
They are actually a fairly scientific bunch, if you simply ignore certain science.
Isn't that an oxymoron?
Isn’t fidelity to honesty a cornerstone of science?
Isn’t that an oxymoron? -- CC
When put briefly like that yes. I knew it sounded weird when I wrote it, but didn't want to elaborate. There's a book on the history witchcraft that came out a few years ago that describes this. Once they decided witches are something to investigate, the rest of the tests and connections they make are mostly logical and involve collecting data.
With flat earth, look at the history of how we figured it out. There’s very little direct experience of living on a ball hanging in space, let alone one that is moving very fast. To “see” the curvature, using the shadows cast by the sun, you need large enough measuring sticks, and cooperation by someone willing to do the measuring, and communication across a distance beyond yelling to each other. None of this had any practical application at the time.
I think we have it easy now because “round world” is in our language. We hear it as get all the rest of our culture. As we mature, we start to doubt that culture, this is healthy for the survival of the species, but, for some, the doubt mechanism overtakes the reasoning mechanism.
You asked -- CC
I did. That was perfect. I needed those terms. I figured it was something like that, but it can be tough to start your research with just a vague notion. Not sure I'll dig into this deeper or not, but now I have a place to start.
Can we say that the earth’s mean elevation is a 2D spherical surface? An Ellipsoid?
I once read that someone calculated the flatness of the state of Kansas, and it truly is flatter than a pancake!
Or we could delve into getting to the edge of the world and peering over to see the 4 elephants standing on the back of a turtle.