Measures of the Anthropocene 1750 - 2000

Too much is never enough and ever increasing profits and wealth is the meaning of life. They promised us, no problem.

Human activity has fundamentally changed our planet. We life on every continent and have directly effected at least 83% of the planet’s viable land surface. Our influence has impacted everything from the makeup of ecosystems to the geochemistry of Earth, from the atmosphere to the oceans. Many scientists define this time in the planet’s history by the scale of human influence, and label it as a new geological epoch called the Anthropocene.

It promises to be a fairly thin, if dramatic layer in the geological column and as time continues moving forward new deposits will bury us ever deeper.

We kids, coming of age in the '70s, we were wrong, it wasn’t the Earth that needed saving, only the biosphere and climate regime that all our human luxuries depends on. Earth’s going to do fine, might even be an exciting period, once things climb out of the pit we’re about to fall into.

Oh it’s an interesting article, not too long, but fairly broad and concise.

1 Like

This little video may give a hint of what is awaiting the earth.

I love/dread reading about overconsumption as much as everyone here but come on…a graph without a labelled axis? That defeats the whole purpose of even using a graph. Are some of the lines log scale? Are they linear? What units are any of these in?

The whole point is to compare different things. So each one has a different unit. You’d have to look into the study’s methods if you want to critique it.

Clearly, the exponential function is in play here. The actual measurement units are irrelevant .
(see Prof. Albert Bartlett, Re; Exponential function)

It was more schematic than a graph.
Perhaps this will help.

This page is pretty fascinating too.\

Perhaps I misunderstood, okay, sometimes gotta go to the source.

March 2011Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 369(1938)/842-67