When one defines a whole race as having a certain stereotypical belief or behavior, they are being ‘racist’. It should not matter if the stereotype is ‘positive’ because the flaw in reasoning is about stereotyping.
To assert that the benefactors of a subset of a whole ARE the whole is thus also itself ‘racist’.
The reasoning behind the veil of WHY many ‘liberal’ sided opinions are so apparently anti-White (and anti-male) relates to the fact that those who ARE relatively well off DUE to their own inheritance and heritage; They are people in dominant power attempting to ‘apologize’ but in a way that they can transfer their own debt of guilt upon the larger superset of their own racist subset.
Here in Canada, for instance, we invented this mentality. It arose out of the fact that Canada was formed accidentally out of two major divisive groups: the arrogant English loyalists who concentrated in Ontario (“Upper Canada” at its origin) and the French Catholics of Quebec (“Lower Canada” originally). Our politicians recognized that our modern populations were no longer predominantly Catholic, and of Quebec’s general population was voluntarily becoming more and more integrated as ‘English’. So they wanted a constitution that permitted a biased right of these two major cults. But to make such a consitution requires finding some means to justify the clear discrimination and bias for these two major groups, both of whom are predominantly of the belief in segregated rights. This is ‘racist’ in that they believe that there is a corresponding GENETIC link of one’s race to some specific culture identity, an ENVIRONMENTAL factor.
So the first step was to preamble (condition) our Constitution (1982) to declare that what follows within it is in light of recognizing the supremacy of God and the Rule of Law. That is, it preconditions what appears to assert us having equality of rights BUT adds later the very racist inclusion of protecting those French and English who have historical roots along with the wealth they passed onto their own children into perpetuity.
But, given that the English Anglicans and the French Catholics are ‘distinct’ and unlikely able to convince ALL Canadians to adapt for being hypocritically biased, they were forced to give equal credence to our Indigenous popultations. Thus, they have enhanced a form of Multi-National Socialists. Given they cannot appeal to demanding specific favor without buying the stronger pluralities out, we became “Multicultural” in a misleading way that has INFECTED the United States’ present drive to embrace this counter-racist ideology.
That is, given that our traditional historically related groups cannot now offer guilt directly without losing power, they ‘apologize’ as the larger class that both the French and English catholics are a part of rather than to their specific fault: the whole White race. Thus it is the literal wealthy established Whites who are controlling the dialogue by blaming ALL people as being at fault so as to lay the liability onto the scapegoated WEAKER Whites.
This in turn pushes those whites who are being penalized indirectly to either shut up or join the rival extreme.
The racism in the U.S. is just an extension of this. Given the world is deluded into thinking Canada is a tame lovable group of people, others see how this CON can work effectively elsewhere.
There definitely are systemic factors in play but those in control are falsely using this to justify permitting a ‘flip’ in which cults get the power rather than fixing the problem. So instead of seeking ‘equality’ as a resolution, they are seeking a reversed empowerment of the stereotype: If Particular cults are at fault for prior racism or sexism, instead of defeating the religious beliefs OF these particular cults, the present paradigm is not to STOP racism/sexism but to permit a kind of ‘equality of being racist or sexist’ instead.
Its fucked up but a very clever means of assuring those whites most guilty to be able to make out like THEY are the good guys by admitting guilt, yet being able to successfully pass on the debt to innocent scapegoats. It’s a win-win strategy BUT is also WHY we had those like Trump succeed. We also now have this very mentality being recognized by the Russians and WHY THEY ARE BEHAVING THE WAY THEY ARE NOW.
So ‘systematically’ this very confusion is leading our world into chaos. Racism is being promoted on the Left now as a form of Multi-National-Socialism versus whichever more consolidated National-Socialism that the Right normally embrace. Thus, we have proven to the world that all people are hopelessly racist and sexist. So we get a Putin who recognizes the rising Nationalism of Ukraine as a threat and thus embracing their own extreme counter Nationalism.
If no one is willing to recognize this, so be it. We are going to end up in a third world war…all because of the stupidity and arrogance of those dictating that our physical appearances suffice in defining one as being victim or perpetrators with specific distinction.
