I try and do religion philosophically, psychologically, discursively. It works better here than with the religious! They find it impossible to objectify. Even in the UK on the best web arena. With the one exception of a superb Anglican priest, in private of course.
Some Anglican/Episcopalian priest are great. I had/have a lot of respect for the late Bishop John Shelby Spong.
Yeah I give him 7 marks out of 12. The rest is Spongiform Theolopathy 
Never totally sure what MPC is alluding to. Iām thinking this is a case of a theologian speaking of openness and doubt in private, while preaching something else. I surprised my pastor one time, he said he would be at a certain restaurant and I could stop by, but I donāt think he expected to me show up. Another friend/congregant also came by, but that one was much more traditionally Catholic and this pastor was always very liberal with me. He used the most ābelieveyā language I had ever heard from him. I commented on it later and he said he adjusts his words to different people. That was the beginning of the end of my churching
1 Like
He was a lovely chap and met me where I was in my head in his abbey study. Iām sure he too would be all things to all men and more than capable of charting a safe via media when preaching. In an academic environment heād be completely disinterested Iām sure.
If I had my religious druthers, Iād prefer Spong, Tom Harper, Don Cupitt, Anthony Freeman (excommunicated for writing āGod In Usā) and others like them. If you havenāt read āGod In Usā by Anthony Freeman, I recommend you do. He was actually excommunicated for something he wrote and was taken out of context. But yes, letās discuss these reformer and their ideas. I would enjoy discussing Bishop Spongās 12 reformations and of course the othersā ideas, if youāve read their works.
1 Like
Iām a mere dilettante, but I like Cupitt. Must read up on the other chaps.
1 Like
Hereās Tom Harpur, if you havenāt heard him. My favourite line in his speech here is, āReligion is mythology misunderstood. Let me say that again. Religion is mythology misunderstood.ā
1 Like
DO! I highly recommend them for everyone who truly wants to learn about modern day religion. Acharya S (DM Murdock) is good, but she was an anthropologist. These guys, while theologians, are not apologists and they make no apology about it. Another, not quite as far left as the Bishops and priests (all Anglican/Episcopalian) is Karen Armstrong. Sheās a former nun. She left the convent long ago. I forgot why, but probably because she couldnāt believe like the Catholic Church wanted her to believe.
1 Like
I love Armstrong. She refuses to call herself a Christian. Apologetics are all, as in all, utterly pathetic, third rate, defensive, whinging, baseless, blustering, and a lot more adjectives like imparsimonious, fallacious arrogance.
1 Like
Have youāve read any of Borgās work? I havenāt yet, but am wanting to. If you have, what do you think of what he has to say?
Iāve not read his work per se, but am superficially familiar with it, dilettante as I am, and that of Crossan in The Jesus Seminar. They seem to be the two pristine faces of the same coin.
I have the same rational, deconstructive, scientific, forensic, historical, anthropological, etc-ical approach; accept all that they say. But 
So, in another life I would read everything and agree with all of it. But still āButā. I am the double minded man, unstable in all his ways of James 1:8
Hence my giving Spong 7/12.
If I were religious, Iād be more inclined to to agree with Harper and Freeman in that we are all one and it (whatever it is) flows through all of us, other animals, the earth, the universeā¦ and whatever we do, affects others. Our actions are not without consequences that affect everyone, especially those closest to us. We are all connected. We are all one. Even our actions today, affect future generations and the actions of our ancestors, both living and dead, affect us today. Thus the Native American saying, āAll my relationsā is a true saying, especially if you understand all of this, because they too have a very similar belief.
So all of these myths (religion is mythology misunderstood) are tribal stories to explain things we have no answer to as of yet. For all we know āitā maybe the life force of the universe connecting us all because we are all part of the universe. Everything found in the universe is found in us (or vise versa- everything found in us is found in the universe). Even today, whatever we donāt understand scientifically, humans attempt to explain away with the lame excuse of āgod did itā, āgodās willā, etc. Then again, we do have a group of humans who donāt understand science, deny it because they donāt understand it, and insist on lame superstitious faith that kills them and/or others.
1 Like
1 Like
One of my Christian fantasy story themes, Iāve yet to write, is The Hound of Heaven. After seeing an unspeakable video report of theā¦ treatment of an animal in China. Everything transcends or nothing does. Everything that suffers. Do you know Doris Lessingās Canopus in Argos series? Part of her Nobel oeuvre. Itā¦ transcends. Iām moved to this moment remembering one of the many nested stories, about a little cat.
I tickled the back of a linden moth one night He liked it. Everything wants to be loved. My personal visualization of God the Holy Ghost is of an Irish wolfhound of fire making Lissajous round the other Persons and all beings.
God I yearn. Sorry
This is the most persuasive argument about science v religion ever. It is brilliant!
1 Like