Yes and no. In the domain of philosophy, I think it is really correct not to take her seriously. And I do not know how the general public would react, when (many) academic philosophers would publicly declare she is/was not a philosopher. ‘Ivory tower’, ‘fake science’ are just 2 reactions I can think of. But it is important to notice that she never went into serious discussions with academic philosophers.
Of course not! Didn’t I say:
Social Darwinism: another example of the naturalistic fallacy.