This thread has me thinking, as one does. I know Ernest Becker spent some time on this. Not sure he solved anything, but made some good points.
Beyond a given point man is not helped by more “knowing,” but only by living and doing in a partly self-forgetful way. As Goethe put it, we must plunge into experience and then reflect on the meaning of it. All reflection and no plunging drives us mad; all plunging and no reflection, and we are brutes.
Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death
This is the easy dichotomy. If you are reflecting, you can find someone who is merely experiencing and accuse them of being in denial, of not facing reality. If you are loving life, living it fully, you might wonder what those navel gazers are up to.
Too much of either is dangerous.
In this next quote, he assumes illusion is a solution and uses as evidence those who don’t maintain it and how they become neurotic without the illusion. Did he ever examine those who stared into the face of death but are not debilitated by it?
The neurotic opts out of life because he is having trouble maintaining his illusions about it, which proves nothing less than that life is possible only with illusions.
Maybe he should have hung out more with artists. The ones who shun the society of self delusion, but are still able to function in it.
The key to the creative type is that he is separated out of the common pool of shared meanings. There is something in his life experience that makes him take in the world as a problem; as a result he has to make personal sense out of it.