What of it?
What do you suggest I’m projecting?
What’s the point of linking to a post I wrote and that you ignored.
I want to deconstruct the Chalmers head game. I believe it’s worth the skeptical eye. Your signaling it’s a ridiculous question, how could anyone question the great philosophers of our age.
Then when I point out, look at the world we created for ourselves, you imply that’s irrelevant. I still need to bow down at their feet - (and ignore all the lessons life has dolled out to me) - and all the self absorbed assumption they repeat over and over and that then bears fruits like this thing.
A New Theory in Physics Claims to Solve the Mystery of Consciousness
Summary: Consciousness can not simply be reduced to neural activity alone, researchers say. A novel study reports the dynamics of consciousness may be understood by a newly developed conceptual and mathematical framework.
Source: Bar-Ilan University - August 11, 2022
What does that piece of writing and conjecture offer regular people who are confused by themselves and god and what their life is about - and are striving to understand themselves more clearly?
Or science in general for that matter.
Oh and yes, all of that does lead into the question of, How do we control our emotions?
A good start would be by better understanding what your body is made out of, where it came from, and how your body communicates with itself and the outside world, how it’s the product of evolution, etc. etc.