I’m trying to find some of my own posts, as well as origins of this long discussion, like this one Kuhn and geniuses getting lost within their own mindscape - Humanism - CFI Forums (centerforinquiry.org)
I don’t think what he says is missing is actually missing, and I’m not getting much detail on what he’s pointing to. Just the word “evolution”, implies the theory, and implies the forces of 4 billion years of environment interacting with biological life. I wouldn’t expect Chalmers or anyone else to stop and restate that. And CC is not the first person to say Chalmers doesn’t have a case, that there is no “hard problem”.