You are still ignoring the fact that it’s what’s happening at the top of the atmosphere that determines how much heat is held within the global heat and moisture distribution engine.
You point out fluctuations on graphs, with out understanding the graphs themselves.
Worst you don’t want to learn. Those are natural fluctuations that are to be expected in surface temperatures. What you want to call “hiatus”, is most easily explained as reflecting the myriad of complex heat exchanges paths ways.
What would you do with that? You don’t have any actual climate science knowledge!
You can’t even admit that it’s what happening in our atmosphere that is the driving factor in Anthropogenic Global Warming.
The Right Wings fixation on short term weather, though only when it shows them something they like, is delusional, (as in seeing what’s not there). That’s objective observation and not a subjective insult, I’ll try keep those to myself.
Rather than short term hiatus bull kacke, do a little fixating on this graph:
Why not worry about real issues, instead of spilling all that ink on 400 words that don’t actually say anything?
You think you can fake it with Science By Rhetoric.
I say this because your words up there are for the most part meaningless non sequiturs.
What’s that mean? What are you suggesting or claiming?
Lausten the double standard is amazing, yet we seem to always fall for it.
Biased opinionated under-education expects be given the same weight, as dedicated hard working intelligent skeptical scientists.
Unfortunately, that contrarian crowd, can’t conceive of hard working and dedicated, let alone an interest in honestly learning and understand what’s happen with the climate our Earth and we depend on. Which becomes transparent after a very little back and forths.
Even 50-year-old climate models correctly predicted global warming
Study debunks idea that older models were inaccurate
- 4 DEC 2019
- BYWARREN CORNWALL
January 9, 2020
Study Confirms Climate Models are Getting Future Warming Projections Right
By Alan Buis,
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory
What’s wrong with these climate models?
By Chad Small | December 16, 2022
What’s wrong with these climate models? - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
There are two major questions in climate modeling - can they accurately reproduce the past (hindcasting) and can they successfully predict the future? To answer the first question, here is a summary of the IPCC model results of surface temperature from the 1800s - both with and without man-made forcings. All the models are unable to predict recent warming without taking rising CO2 levels into account . Nobody has created a general circulation model that can explain climate’s behavior over the past century without CO2warming.
What give Tim the right to make such disparaging remarks about real scientists, and expend such effort at implying they are not to be trusted.
No instead it suggests we need “independent” journalism with no specific education, no commitment of focus and honesty to fellow colleagues, the way scientists do; and lots and of of bias to sew doubt and sell articles and convince people of opinions.
WHY NOT ratchet up the crazy until no one, but experts and the few who actually care to do real homework, know what’s up or down.
Tim, you start behaving honorably and I’ll happy show you some respect, trash talk scientists, and misrepresent their data, expect push back !